Mechanism of Prominent Trimethylamine Oxide (TMAO) Accumulation in Hemodialysis Patients
Open accessAbstract
Large size, protein binding and intracellular sequestration are well known to limit dialytic removal of compounds. In studying the normal renal and dialytic handling of trimethylamine oxide (TMAO), a molecule associated with cardiovascular disease in the general population, we discovered two largely unrecognized additional limitations to sustained reduction of a solute by chronic hemodialysis. We measured solute levels and handling in subjects on chronic hemodialysis (ESRD, n = 7) and compared these with levels and clearance in normal controls (NLS, n = 6). The ESRD patients had much higher peak predialysis plasma levels of TMAO than NLS (77 ± 26 vs 2±1 μM, mean ± SD, p<0.05). For comparison, predialysis BUN levels in ESRD subjects were 45±11 mg/dl and 15±3 mg/dl in NLS. Thus TMAO levels in ESRD average about 40 fold those in NLS while BUN is 3 fold NLS. However, the fractional reduction of TMAO concentration during dialysis, was in fact greater than that of urea (86±3 vs 74±6%, TMAO vs urea, p < 0.05) and its dialytic clearance while somewhat lower than that of urea was comparable to creatinine's. Also production rates were similar (533±272 vs 606 ± 220 μ moles/day, ESRD vs NLS, p>0.05). However, TMAO has a volume of distribution about one half that of urea. Also in NLS the urinary clearance of TMAO was high (219±78 ml/min) compared to the urinary urea and creatinine clearances (55±14 and 119±21 ml/min, respectively). Thus, TMAO levels achieve multiples of normal much greater than those of urea due mainly to 1) TMAO's high clearance by the normal kidney relative to urea and 2) its smaller volume of distribution. Modelling suggests that only much more frequent dialysis would be required to lower levels Thus, additional strategies such as reducing production should be explored. Furthermore, using urea as the sole marker of dialysis adequacy may be misleading since a molecule, TMAO, that is dialyzed readily accumulates to much higher multiples of normal with urea based dialysis prescriptions.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
TMAO is cleared more efficiently than urea by normal kidney function but not by dialysis.
“TMAO is cleared more efficiently than urea by the normal kidney function but not by dialysis (45).”
From Trimethylamine <i>N</i> -Oxide, the Microbiome, and Heart and Kidney Disease (2017) · cites this paper as [45]
Accumulation of TMAO in ESRD patients on chronic hemodialysis is mainly due to a previously unrecognized limitation of chronic dialysis.
“It was suggested that the accumulation of TMAO in end-stage renal disease patients who receive chronic hemodialysis is mainly due to the previously unrecognized limitation of chronic dialysis (45).”
From Trimethylamine <i>N</i> -Oxide, the Microbiome, and Heart and Kidney Disease (2017) · cites this paper as [45]
The high renal clearance rate of TMAO indicates that in addition to glomerular filtration, at least 50% of its renal excretion possibly occurs through tubular secretion.
“The high renal clearance rate of TMAO indicates that in addition to glomerular filtration, at least 50% of its renal excretion possibly occurs through tubular secretion.”
From Trimethylamine N-oxide: the good, the bad and the unknown. (2016) · cites this paper as [26]
TMAO has a small volume of distribution-about one half that of urea-but a higher renal clearance compared to urea and creatinine.
“Studies on pharmacokinetics [25] and renal clearance of TMAO [26] in healthy human subjects suggest that TMAO has a small volume of distribution—about one half that of urea—but a higher renal clearance compared to urea and creatinine.”
From Trimethylamine N-oxide: the good, the bad and the unknown. (2016) · cites this paper as [26]
In normal subjects, urinary clearance of TMAO was 219 ± 78 mL/min compared to urinary urea and creatinine clearances 55 ± 14 and 119 ± 21 mL/min, respectively.
“In normal subjects, the urinary clearance of TMAO was 219 ± 78 mL/min compared to the urinary urea and creatinine clearances 55 ± 14 and 119 ± 21 mL/min, respectively.”
From Trimethylamine N-oxide: the good, the bad and the unknown. (2016) · cites this paper as [26]
TMAO concentrations in ESRD patients on dialysis are 40-fold higher compared with control subjects.
“TMAO concentrations in ESRD patients on dialysis are 40-fold higher compared with control subjects [26].”
From Trimethylamine N-oxide: the good, the bad and the unknown. (2016) · cites this paper as [26]
The production rate of TMAO is not higher in end-stage renal disease patients compared to control subjects.
“Hai et al. showed that the production rate of TMAO is not higher in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients compared to control subjects [26].”
From Trimethylamine N-oxide: the good, the bad and the unknown. (2016) · cites this paper as [26]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 17 · Cited by 122
- Authors
- Hai, X., Landeras, V., Dobre, M. A., DeOreo, P., Meyer, T. W., & Hostetter, T. H.
- Affiliations
- Case Western Reserve University (US)
- Stanford Medicine (US)
- Corresponding author
- Hostetter, Thomas H.
- Venue
- PLOS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2015-12-09
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- e0143731
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4674074
- OpenAlex
- W2190510948
- Cited by
- 122
- References
- 17
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7
- FWCI
- 8.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- public-domain
- creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (vor)
- Locations
- PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, public-domain)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, public-domain)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, public-domain)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- American Heart Association
- Rosenberg Foundation
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01DK080123)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Parathyroid Disorders and Treatments
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Clinical Biochemistry › Metabolism and Genetic Disorders
- Keywords
- trimethylamine N-oxide, maintenance hemodialysis, end-stage renal disease, dialytic clearance, urea clearance, volume of distribution, urinary clearance, dialysis adequacy, cardiovascular biomarkers, urea reduction ratio
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Creatinine, Female, Renal Dialysis, Humans, Kidney Failure, Chronic, Male, Methylamines, Urea, Biomarkers, Case-Control Studies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review