Cited by 29Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive PhysiologyAnimal Nutrition and PhysiologyAnaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production

Fibrolytic Bacteria Isolated from the Rumen of North American Moose (Alces alces) and Their Use as a Probiotic in Neonatal Lambs

Open access
Ishaq, Suzanne L., Kim, Christina J., Reis, Doug, Wright, André-Denis G.·2015·PLoS ONE

Abstract

Fibrolytic bacteria were isolated from the rumen of North American moose (Alces alces), which eat a high-fiber diet of woody browse. It was hypothesized that fibrolytic bacteria isolated from the moose rumen could be used as probiotics to improve fiber degradation and animal production. Thirty-one isolates (Bacillus, n = 26; Paenibacillus, n = 1; and Staphylococcus, n = 4) were cultured from moose rumen digesta samples collected in Vermont. Using Sanger sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene, culturing techniques, and optical densities, isolates were identified and screened for biochemical properties important to plant carbohydrate degradation. Five isolates were selected as candidates for use as a probiotic, which was administered daily to neonate lambs for 9 weeks. It was hypothesized that regular administration of a probiotic to improve fibrolysis to neonate animals through weaning would increase the developing rumen bacterial diversity, increase animal production, and allow for long-term colonization of the probiotic species. Neither weight gain nor wool quality was improved in lambs given a probiotic, however, dietary efficiency was increased as evidenced by the reduced feed intake (and rearing costs) without a loss to weight gain. Experimental lambs had a lower acetate to propionate ratio than control lambs, which was previously shown to indicate increased dietary efficiency. Fibrolytic bacteria made up the majority of sequences, mainly Prevotella, Butyrivibrio, and Ruminococcus. While protozoal densities increased over time and were stable, methanogen densities varied greatly in the first six months of life for lambs. This is likely due to the changing diet and bacterial populations in the developing rumen.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0144804

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Exposure of neonate lambs to the dam for 1 week followed by subsequent separation is enough to ensure the establishment of a stable rumen protozoal population for their lifetime.

    “A relatively recent study by Ishaq et al. (2015) showed that exposure of neonate lambs to the dam for 1 week followed by subsequent separation was enough to ensure the establishment of a stable rumen protozoal population for their lifetime.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 81 · Cited by 29

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [9]Dehority BA. Microbes in the foregut of arctic ruminants In: Milligan LP, Grovum WL, Dobson A, editors. control of digestion and metabolism in ruminants: Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Ruminant Physiology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall; 1986 p. 307– 325.
  2. [34]Gasaway WC, Coady JW. Review of energy requirements and rumen fermentation in moose and other ruminants. Nat Can. 1974; 101: 227– 262.
  3. [35]Committee on the Nutrient Requirements of Small Ruminants, N. R. C. Nutrient requirements of small ruminants: sheep, goats, cervids and New World camelids. 1st ed Washington: National Academies Press; 2007 pp. 384.
  4. [41]Paul J, Sarkar A, Varma AK. In vitro studies of cellulose digesting properties of Staphylococcus saprophyticus isolated from termite gut. Curr Sci. 1986; 55: 710– 714.

Authors
Ishaq, S. L., Kim, C. J., Reis, D., & Wright, A.-D. G.
Affiliations
University of Vermont (US)
Corresponding author
Ishaq, Suzanne L.
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2015-12-30
Volume
10
Issue
12
Pages
e0144804
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2204638065
Cited by
29
References
81
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2
FWCI
5.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Agriculture
  • National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
Keywords
fibrolytic bacteria, probiotics, moose, newborn lambs, rumen fermentation, fiber degradation, Bacillus, Paenibacillus, Staphylococcus, rumen bacterial diversity, dietary efficiency, acetate to propionate ratio, methanogenic archaea, rumen protozoa, wool quality, feed intake
MeSH terms
Acetates, Animals, Animals, Newborn, Bacteria, Deer, Dietary Fiber, Feeding Behavior, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Phylogeny, Propionates, Rumen, Sheep, Temperature, Time Factors, Discriminant Analysis, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Probiotics, Principal Component Analysis, Biodiversity, Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review