Cited by 11Mechanical Circulatory Support DevicesTransplantation: Methods and OutcomesCardiac Fibrosis and Remodeling

A New Animal Model for Investigation of Mechanical Unloading in Hypertrophic and Failing Hearts: Combination of Transverse Aortic Constriction and Heterotopic Heart Transplantation

Open access
Schaefer, Andreas, Schneeberger, Yvonne, Stenzig, Justus, Biermann, Daniel, Jelinek, Marisa, Reichenspurner, Hermann, Eschenhagen, Thomas, Ehmke, Heimo +1 more·2016·PLoS ONE

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Previous small animal models for simulation of mechanical unloading are solely performed in healthy or infarcted hearts, not representing the pathophysiology of hypertrophic and dilated hearts emerging in heart failure patients. In this article, we present a new and economic small animal model to investigate mechanical unloading in hypertrophic and failing hearts: the combination of transverse aortic constriction (TAC) and heterotopic heart transplantation (hHTx) in rats. METHODS: To induce cardiac hypertrophy and failure in rat hearts, three-week old rats underwent TAC procedure. Three and six weeks after TAC, hHTx with hypertrophic and failing hearts in Lewis rats was performed to induce mechanical unloading. After 14 days of mechanical unloading animals were euthanatized and grafts were explanted for further investigations. RESULTS: 50 TAC procedures were performed with a survival of 92% (46/50). When compared to healthy rats left ventricular surface decreased to 5.8±1.0 mm² (vs. 9.6± 2.4 mm²) (p = 0.001) after three weeks with a fractional shortening (FS) of 23.7± 4.3% vs. 28.2± 1.5% (p = 0.01). Six weeks later, systolic function decreased to 17.1± 3.2% vs. 28.2± 1.5% (p = 0.0001) and left ventricular inner surface increased to 19.9±1.1 mm² (p = 0.0001). Intraoperative graft survival during hHTx was 80% with 46 performed procedures (37/46). All transplanted organs survived two weeks of mechanical unloading. DISCUSSION: Combination of TAC and hHTx in rats offers an economic and reproducible small animal model enabling serial examination of mechanical unloading in a truly hypertrophic and failing heart, representing the typical pressure overloaded and dilated LV, occurring in patients with moderate to severe heart failure.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0148259

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The ICR suckling mice model has allowed investigation of some aspects of ZIKV-caused symptoms, including viral-related mortality, clinical score increase, and viral propagation rise.

    “Similarly, the ICR suckling mice model allowed the investigation of some aspect of ZIKV-caused symptom including viral-relative mortality, clinical score increasing, and viral propagation rising [22, 32].”

    From ICR suckling mouse model of Zika virus infection for disease modeling and drug validation (2018) · cites this paper as [22]

    The Background describes a rat model for mechanical unloading in hypertrophic and failing hearts, not a ZIKV infection model. Searches for ICR suckling mice, ZIKV, mortality, clinical scores, and viral propagation found no passage in our copy addressing the attributed claim. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schaefer, A., Schneeberger, Y., Stenzig, J., Biermann, D., Jelinek, M., Reichenspurner, H., Eschenhagen, T., Ehmke, H., & Schwoerer, A. P.
Affiliations
  • Universität Hamburg (DE)
  • University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (DE)
Corresponding author
Schaefer, Andreas
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2016-02-03
Volume
11
Issue
2
Pages
e0148259
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2266156709
Cited by
11
References
23
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4
FWCI
1.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Fibrosis and Remodeling
Keywords
mechanical unloading, heart failure, cardiac hypertrophy, transverse aortic constriction, heterotopic heart transplantation, animal models, left ventricular remodeling, pressure overload, left ventricular dilatation, graft survival, systolic function
MeSH terms
Animals, Aorta, Disease Models, Animal, Heart, Cardiomegaly, Heart Failure, Heart-Assist Devices, Male, Rats, Inbred Lew, Heart Transplantation, Transplantation, Heterotopic, Ventricular Remodeling, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review