Cited by 19Gestational Diabetes Research and ManagementDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsDiabetes Management and Research

Universal HbA1c Measurement in Early Pregnancy to Detect Type 2 Diabetes Reduces Ethnic Disparities in Antenatal Diabetes Screening: A Population-Based Observational Study

Open access
Hughes, R. C. E., Williman, J., Gullam, J. E.·2016·PLOS ONE

Abstract

In response to the type 2 diabetes epidemic, measuring HbA1c with the first-antenatal blood screen was recently recommended in NZ. This would enable prompt treatment of women with unrecognised type 2 diabetes, who may otherwise go undetected until the gestational diabetes (GDM) screen. We compare inter-ethnic antenatal screening practices to examine whether the HbA1c test would be accessed by ethnicities most at risk of diabetes, and we determined the prevalence of unrecognised type 2 diabetes and prediabetes in our pregnant population. This is an observational study of pregnancies in Christchurch NZ during 2008-2010. Utilising electronic databases, we matched maternal characteristics to first-antenatal bloods, HbA1c, and GDM screens (glucose challenge tests and oral glucose tolerance tests). Overall uptake of the first-antenatal bloods versus GDM screening was 83.1% and 53.8% respectively in 11,580 pregnancies. GDM screening was lowest in Māori 39.3%, incidence proportion ratio (IPR) 0.77 (0.71, 0.84) compared with Europeans. By including HbA1c with the first-antenatal bloods, the number screened for diabetes increases by 28.5% in Europeans, 40.0% in Māori, 28.1% in Pacific People, and 26.7% in 'Others' (majority of Asian descent). The combined prevalence of unrecognised type 2 diabetes and prediabetes by NZ criteria, HbA1c ≥5.9% (41mmol/mol), was 2.1% in Europeans, Māori 4.7% IPR 2.59 (1.71, 3.93), Pacific People 9.5% IPR 4.76 (3.10, 7.30), and 'Others' 6.2% IPR 2.99 (2.19, 4.07). Applying these prevalence data to 2013 NZ national births data, routine antenatal HbA1c testing could have identified type 2 diabetes in 0.44% and prediabetes in 3.96% of women. Routine HbA1c measurement in early pregnancy is an ideal screening opportunity, particularly benefitting vulnerable groups, reducing ethnic disparities in antenatal diabetes screening. This approach is likely to have world-wide relevance and applicability. Further research is underway to establish whether, as for type 2 diabetes, prompt treatment of prediabetes improves pregnancy and neonatal outcomes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0156926

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [1]International Diabetes Federation Diabetes Atlas. Seventh Edition, 2015 UK: International Diabetes Federation, 2015. Available: http://www.diabetesatlas.org ISBN: 978-2-930229-81-2
  2. [10]Perinatal and Maternal Mortality Review Committee. Executive Summary of the Ninth Annual Report of the Perinatal and Maternal Mortality Review Committee Reporting mortality. Health Quality and Safety Commission New Zealand. 2013. Available: www.hqsc.govt.nz/assets/PMMRC/Publications/Ninth-PMMRC-report
  3. [13]Lumley T. Analysis of complex survey samples. Journal of Statistical Software 2004; 9: 1– 19.
  4. [15]Ninth Annual Report of the Perinatal and Maternal Mortality Review Committee. Reporting Mortality 2013. Health Quality and Safety Commission NZ. 2015. Available: http://www.hqsc.govt.nz/our-programmes/mrc/pmmrc/publications-and-resources/publication/2123/

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hughes, R. C. E., Williman, J., & Gullam, J. E.
Affiliations
University of Otago (NZ)
Corresponding author
Hughes, R. C. E.
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2016-06-07
Volume
11
Issue
6
Pages
e0156926
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2410220824
Cited by
19
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
FWCI
2.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
HbA1c, type 2 diabetes in pregnancy, gestational diabetes mellitus, prediabetes, ethnic disparities, Māori, Pacific Islanders, screening uptake, oral glucose tolerance test, glucose challenge test
MeSH terms
Adult, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Glucose Tolerance Test, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Mass Screening, New Zealand, Pregnancy, Prenatal Diagnosis, Retrospective Studies, Sensitivity and Specificity, Prevalence, Diabetes, Gestational, Early Diagnosis, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review