Cited by 238Gestational Diabetes Research and ManagementDiabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

An Early Pregnancy HbA1c ≥5.9% (41 mmol/mol) Is Optimal for Detecting Diabetes and Identifies Women at Increased Risk of Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes

Hughes, Ruth C.E., Moore, M. Peter, Gullam, Joanna E., Mohamed, Khadeeja, Rowan, Janet·2014·Diabetes Care

Abstract

Objective Pregnant women with undiagnosed diabetes are a high-risk group that may benefit from early intervention. Extrapolating from nonpregnancy data, HbA1c ≥6.5% (48 mmol/mol) is recommended to define diabetes in pregnancy. Our aims were to determine the optimal HbA1c threshold for detecting diabetes in early pregnancy as defined by an early oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) at Research design and methods During 2008-2010 in Christchurch, New Zealand, women were offered an HbA1c measurement with their first antenatal bloods. Pregnancy outcome data were collected. A subset completed an early OGTT, and HbA1c performance was assessed using World Health Organization criteria. Results HbA1c was measured at a median 47 days' gestation in 16,122 women. Of those invited, 974/4,201 (23%) undertook an early OGTT. In this subset, HbA1c ≥5.9% (41 mmol/mol) captured all 15 cases of diabetes, 7 with HbA1c Conclusions HbA1c measurements were readily performed in contrast to the low uptake of early OGTTs. HbA1c ≥5.9% (≥41 mmol/mol) identified all women with diabetes and a group at significantly increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/dc14-1312

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hughes, R. C. E., Moore, M. P., Gullam, J. E., Mohamed, K., & Rowan, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Otago (NZ)
  • Christchurch Hospital (NZ)
  • Auckland City Hospital (NZ)
Corresponding author
Hughes, Ruth C.E.
Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
2014-10-10
Volume
37
Issue
11
Pages
2953-2959
ISSN
  • 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-5548
OpenAlex
W2155177707
Cited by
238
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 13
FWCI
14.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Diabetes Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
gestational diabetes mellitus, HbA1c thresholds, early pregnancy, oral glucose tolerance test, gestational diabetes screening, adverse pregnancy outcomes, major congenital malformations, preeclampsia, shoulder dystocia, perinatal death, diagnostic accuracy, prenatal care, early intervention
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Glucose Tolerance Test, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, New Zealand, Pre-Eclampsia, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Outcome, Prospective Studies, Risk, Cohort Studies, Diabetes, Gestational, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review