Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 334

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Unmanned Aerial Vehicles for High-Throughput Phenotyping and Agronomic Research

Open access
Shi, Yeyin, Thomasson, J. Alex, Murray, Seth C., Pugh, N. Ace, Rooney, William L., Shafian, Sanaz, Rajan, Nithya, Rouze, Gregory, Morgan, Cristine L. S., Neely, Haly L., Rana, Aman, Bagavathiannan, Muthu V., Henrickson, James, Bowden, Ezekiel, Valasek, John, Olsenholler, Jeff, Bishop, Michael P., Sheridan, Ryan, Putman, Eric B., Popescu, Sorin, Burks, Travis, Cope, Dale, Ibrahim, Amir, McCutchen, Billy F., Baltensperger, David D., Avant, Robert V., Vidrine, Misty, Yang, Chenghai·2016·PLOS ONE

Abstract

Advances in automation and data science have led agriculturists to seek real-time, high-quality, high-volume crop data to accelerate crop improvement through breeding and to optimize agronomic practices. Breeders have recently gained massive data-collection capability in genome sequencing of plants. Faster phenotypic trait data collection and analysis relative to genetic data leads to faster and better selections in crop improvement. Furthermore, faster and higher-resolution crop data collection leads to greater capability for scientists and growers to improve precision-agriculture practices on increasingly larger farms; e.g., site-specific application of water and nutrients. Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) have recently gained traction as agricultural data collection systems. Using UAVs for agricultural remote sensing is an innovative technology that differs from traditional remote sensing in more ways than strictly higher-resolution images; it provides many new and unique possibilities, as well as new and unique challenges. Herein we report on processes and lessons learned from year 1-the summer 2015 and winter 2016 growing seasons-of a large multidisciplinary project evaluating UAV images across a range of breeding and agronomic research trials on a large research farm. Included are team and project planning, UAV and sensor selection and integration, and data collection and analysis workflow. The study involved many crops and both breeding plots and agronomic fields. The project's goal was to develop methods for UAVs to collect high-quality, high-volume crop data with fast turnaround time to field scientists. The project included five teams: Administration, Flight Operations, Sensors, Data Management, and Field Research. Four case studies involving multiple crops in breeding and agronomic applications add practical descriptive detail. Lessons learned include critical information on sensors, air vehicles, and configuration parameters for both. As the first and most comprehensive project of its kind to date, these lessons are particularly salient to researchers embarking on agricultural research with UAVs.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0159781

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 37 references

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. M Mirik, 2011, Satellite remote sensing of wheat infected by wheat streak mosaic virus, Plant Disease, 95, 4, 10.1094/PDIS-04-10-0256 · doi:10.1094/pdis-04-10-0256
  2. X Li, 2012, Spectral difference analysis and airborne imaging classification for citrus greening infected trees, Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 83, 32, 10.1016/j.compag.2012.01.010 · doi:10.1016/j.compag.2012.01.010
  3. Y Huang, 2010, Multispectral imaging systems for airborne remote sensing to support agricultural production management, International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, 3, 50
  4. SR Herwitz, 2004, Imaging from an unmanned aerial vehicle: agricultural surveillance and decision support, Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 44, 49, 10.1016/j.compag.2004.02.006 · doi:10.1016/j.compag.2004.02.006
  5. C Yang, 2014, An airborne multispectral imaging system based on two consumer-grade cameras for agricultural remote sensing, Remote Sensing, 6, 5257, 10.3390/rs6065257 · doi:10.3390/rs6065257
  6. W Rooney, 2004, Sorghum improvement—integrating traditional and new technology to produce improved genotypes, Advances in agronomy, 83, 37, 10.1016/S0065-2113(04)83002-5 · doi:10.1016/s0065-2113(04)83002-5
  7. G Grenzdörffer, 2014, Crop height determination with UAS point clouds, ISPRS-International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 1, 135, 10.5194/isprsarchives-XL-1-135-2014 · doi:10.5194/isprsarchives-xl-1-135-2014
  8. N Rajan, 2014, Aerial remote sensing of peanut ground cover, Agronomy Journal, 106, 1358, 10.2134/agronj13.0532 · doi:10.2134/agronj13.0532
  9. GL Ritchie, 2010, Sensitivities of normalized difference vegetation index and a green/red ratio index to cotton ground cover fraction, Crop science, 50, 1000, 10.2135/cropsci2009.04.0203 · doi:10.2135/cropsci2009.04.0203
  10. C Wiegand, 1990, Multisite analyses of spectral-biophysical data for corn, Remote Sensing of Environment, 33, 1, 10.1016/0034-4257(90)90051-M · doi:10.1016/0034-4257(90)90051-m

Cited by

See all 334

Metadata

Authors
Shi, Y., Thomasson, J. A., Murray, S. C., Pugh, N. A., Rooney, W. L., Shafian, S., Rajan, N., Rouze, G., Morgan, C. L. S., Neely, H. L., Rana, A., Bagavathiannan, M. V., Henrickson, J., Bowden, E., Valasek, J., Olsenholler, J., Bishop, M. P., Sheridan, R., Putman, E. B., Popescu, S., Burks, T., Cope, D., Ibrahim, A., McCutchen, B. F., Baltensperger, D. D., Avant, R. V., Vidrine, M., & Yang, C.
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2016-07-29
Volume
11
Issue
7
Pages
e0159781
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2479938810
Cited by
334
References
37
FWCI
32.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Unmanned Aerial Vehicles for High-Throughput Phenotyping and Agronomic Research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pone.0159781
The paper
Shi, Y., Thomasson, J. A., Murray, S. C., Pugh, N. A., Rooney, W. L., Shafian, S., Rajan, N., Rouze, G., Morgan, C. L. S., Neely, H. L., Rana, A., Bagavathiannan, M. V., Henrickson, J., Bowden, E., Valasek, J., Olsenholler, J., Bishop, M. P., Sheridan, R., Putman, E. B., . . . Yang, C. (2016). Unmanned Aerial Vehicles for High-Throughput Phenotyping and Agronomic Research. PLOS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159781

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.