The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Opposite Effects of mGluR1a and mGluR5 Activation on Nucleus Accumbens Medium Spiny Neuron Dendritic Spine Density
Open accessAbstract
The group I metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluR1a and mGluR5) are important modulators of neuronal structure and function. Although these receptors share common signaling pathways, they are capable of having distinct effects on cellular plasticity. We investigated the individual effects of mGluR1a or mGluR5 activation on dendritic spine density in medium spiny neurons in the nucleus accumbens (NAc), which has become relevant with the potential use of group I mGluR based therapeutics in the treatment of drug addiction. We found that systemic administration of mGluR subtype-specific positive allosteric modulators had opposite effects on dendritic spine densities. Specifically, mGluR5 positive modulation decreased dendritic spine densities in the NAc shell and core, but was without effect in the dorsal striatum, whereas increased spine densities in the NAc were observed with mGluR1a positive modulation. Additionally, direct activation of mGluR5 via CHPG administration into the NAc also decreased the density of dendritic spines. These data provide insight on the ability of group I mGluRs to induce structural plasticity in the NAc and demonstrate that the group I mGluRs are capable of producing not just distinct, but opposing, effects on dendritic spine density.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Um, J. W., Kaufman, A. C., Kostylev, M., Heiss, J. K., Stagi, M., Takahashi, H., Kerrisk, M. E., Vortmeyer, A., Wisniewski, T., Koleske, A. J., et al. (2013) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2013.06.036 · Cited by 572
Synaptic depression via mGluR1 positive allosteric modulation suppresses cue-induced cocaine craving
Loweth, J. A., Scheyer, A. F., Milovanovic, M., LaCrosse, A. L., Flores-Barrera, E., Werner, C. T., Li, X., Ford, K. A., Le, T., Olive, M. F., et al. (2014) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.3590 · Cited by 157
Self-citation
Cited by
Stiglic, N., & Viner, R. M. (2019) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023191 · Cited by 1,259
Petrelli, F., Cortellini, A., Indini, A., Tomasello, G., Ghidini, M., Nigro, O., Salati, M., Dottorini, L., Iaculli, A., Varricchio, A., et al. (2021) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.3520 · Cited by 530
Colich, N. L., Rosen, M. L., Williams, E. S., & McLaughlin, K. A. (2020) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000270 · Cited by 433
Wang, H., Marcišauskas, S., Sánchez, B. J., Domenzain, I., Hermansson, D., Agren, R., Nielsen, J., & Kerkhoven, E. J. (2018) · PLOS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006541 · Cited by 381
Measuring MEG Closer to the Brain: Performance of on-Scalp Sensor Arrays
Iivanainen, J., Stenroos, M., & Parkkonen, L. (2017) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.12.048 · Cited by 296
Metadata
- Authors
- Gross, K. S., Brandner, D. D., Martinez, L. A., Olive, M. F., Meisel, R. L., & Mermelstein, P. G.
- Venue
- PLOS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2016-09-12
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- e0162755
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2520345180
- Cited by
- 1,609
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 58.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.