Test Expectation Enhances Memory Consolidation across Both Sleep and Wake.
Open accessAbstract
Memory consolidation benefits from post-training sleep. However, recent studies suggest that sleep does not uniformly benefit all memory, but instead prioritizes information that is important to the individual. Here, we examined the effect of test expectation on memory consolidation across sleep and wakefulness. Following reports that information with strong "future relevance" is preferentially consolidated during sleep, we hypothesized that test expectation would enhance memory consolidation across a period of sleep, but not across wakefulness. To the contrary, we found that expectation of a future test enhanced memory for both spatial and motor learning, but that this effect was equivalent across both wake and sleep retention intervals. These observations differ from those of least two prior studies, and fail to support the hypothesis that the "future relevance" of learned material moderates its consolidation selectively during sleep.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 48 · Cited by 29
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- [30]Fiss H, Kremer E, Litchman J. The mnemonic function of dreaming. Sleep Res. 1977; 6: 122.
- [50]Goschke T, Kuhl J. Representation of intentions: Persisting activation in memory. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1993; 19: 1211– 1226. 10.1037/0278-7393.19.5.1211 · DOI · Paper page
- Authors
- Wamsley, E. J., Hamilton, K., Graveline, Y., Manceor, S., & Parr, E.
- Affiliations
- Furman University (US)
- University of British Columbia (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Wamsley, Erin J.
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2016-10-19
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- e0165141
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC5070851
- OpenAlex
- W2537263927
- Cited by
- 29
- References
- 48
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 1.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Fundação Bial (83/12)
- National Institute of Mental Health (R01-MH48832)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Keywords
- memory consolidation, sleep-dependent memory consolidation, wakefulness, spatial learning, motor learning, retention interval
- MeSH terms
- Memory Consolidation, Adolescent, Female, Humans, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Mental Recall, Sleep, Wakefulness, Young Adult, Spatial Learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review