Cited by 29Sleep and Wakefulness ResearchMemory and Neural MechanismsMemory Processes and Influences

Test Expectation Enhances Memory Consolidation across Both Sleep and Wake.

Open access
Wamsley, Erin J., Hamilton, Kelly, Graveline, Yvette, Manceor, Stephanie, Parr, Elaine·2016·PLoS ONE

Abstract

Memory consolidation benefits from post-training sleep. However, recent studies suggest that sleep does not uniformly benefit all memory, but instead prioritizes information that is important to the individual. Here, we examined the effect of test expectation on memory consolidation across sleep and wakefulness. Following reports that information with strong "future relevance" is preferentially consolidated during sleep, we hypothesized that test expectation would enhance memory consolidation across a period of sleep, but not across wakefulness. To the contrary, we found that expectation of a future test enhanced memory for both spatial and motor learning, but that this effect was equivalent across both wake and sleep retention intervals. These observations differ from those of least two prior studies, and fail to support the hypothesis that the "future relevance" of learned material moderates its consolidation selectively during sleep.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0165141

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 48 · Cited by 29

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [30]Fiss H, Kremer E, Litchman J. The mnemonic function of dreaming. Sleep Res. 1977; 6: 122.
  2. [50]Goschke T, Kuhl J. Representation of intentions: Persisting activation in memory. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1993; 19: 1211– 1226. 10.1037/0278-7393.19.5.1211 · DOI · Paper page

Authors
Wamsley, E. J., Hamilton, K., Graveline, Y., Manceor, S., & Parr, E.
Affiliations
  • Furman University (US)
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
Corresponding author
Wamsley, Erin J.
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2016-10-19
Volume
11
Issue
10
Pages
e0165141
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2537263927
Cited by
29
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
FWCI
1.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Fundação Bial (83/12)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01-MH48832)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
memory consolidation, sleep-dependent memory consolidation, wakefulness, spatial learning, motor learning, retention interval
MeSH terms
Memory Consolidation, Adolescent, Female, Humans, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Mental Recall, Sleep, Wakefulness, Young Adult, Spatial Learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review