The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Relationship between Physical Disability and Depression by Gender: A Panel Regression Model
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Depression in persons with physical disabilities may be more common than in the general population. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between physical disability and depression by gender among adults, using a large, nationally representative sample. METHODS: This study used data from the Korean Longitudinal Study of Aging, Wave one through four, and ran a series of random effect panel regression models to test the relationship between physical disability status and depression by gender. We tested the moderating effect of gender on the relationship between disability status and depression level by examining the significance of the cross-product term between disability status and gender. RESULTS: After controlling for self-rated health, marital status, employment status, education, and age, subjects who were female or diagnosed as having any disability presented higher levels of depression scores. Further, the difference in terms of their depression level measured by Center for Epidemiologic Studies Short Depression Scale (CES-D 10) scores between those who were diagnosed as having any disability and those who were not was greater for females than for their male counterparts. CONCLUSION: This study reaffirmed that disability is the risk factor of depression, using longitudinal data. In addition, female gender is the effect modifier rather than the risk factor. The effect of gender in the non-disability group, mostly composed of older persons, is limited. On the contrary, the female disability group showed more depressive symptoms than the male disability group. The gender difference in the disability group and the role of culture on these differences need further research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gender differences in depression
Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (2001) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/1467-8721.00142 · Cited by 1,474
Risk Factors for Depression Among Elderly Community Subjects: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Cole, M. G., & Dendukuri, N. (2003) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.160.6.1147 · Cited by 1,368
Segal, D. L., Coolidge, F. L., Cahill, B. S., & O'Riley, A. A. (2008) · Behavior Modification · doi:10.1177/0145445507303833 · Cited by 335
Girgus, J. S., & Yang, K. (2015) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.01.019 · Cited by 217
Cited by
Triple jeopardy: disabled people and the COVID-19 pandemic
Shakespeare, T., Ndagire, F., & Seketi, Q. E. (2021) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(21)00625-5 · Cited by 312
Simning, A., & Seplaki, C. L. (2020) · International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/gps.5221 · Cited by 26
Metadata
- Authors
- Noh, J.-W., Kwon, Y. D., Park, J., Oh, I.-H., & Kim, J.
- Venue
- PLOS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2016-11-30
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- e0166238
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2559148690
- Cited by
- 164
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 2.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Relationship between Physical Disability and Depression by Gender: A Panel Regression Model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pone.0166238
- The paper
- Noh, J.-W., Kwon, Y. D., Park, J., Oh, I.-H., & Kim, J. (2016). Relationship between Physical Disability and Depression by Gender: A Panel Regression Model. PLOS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166238
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.