Cited by 43Pharmaceutical industry and healthcareInnovations in Medical EducationGlobal Public Health Policies and Epidemiology

Conflict of Interest Policies at French Medical Schools: Starting from the Bottom

Open access
Scheffer, Paul, Guy-Coichard, Christian, Outh-Gauer, David, Calet-Froissart, Zoéline, Boursier, Mathilde, Mintzes, Barbara, Borde, Jean-Sébastien·2017·PLOS ONE

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Medical faculties have a role in ensuring that their students are protected from undue commercial influence during their training, and are educated about professional-industry interactions. In North America, many medical faculties have introduced more stringent conflict of interest (COI) policies during the last decade. We asked whether similar steps had been taken in France. We hypothesized that such policies may have been introduced following a 2009-2010 drug safety scandal (benfluorex, Mediator) in which COIs in medicine received prominent press attention. METHODS: We searched the websites of all 37 French Faculties of Medicine in May 2015 for COI policies and curriculum, using standardized keyword searches. We also surveyed all deans of medicine on institutional COI policies and curriculum, based on criteria developed in similar US and Canadian surveys. Personal contacts were also consulted. We calculated a summary score per faculty based on 13 criteria. [range 0-26; higher scores denoting stronger policies]. RESULTS: In total, we found that 9/37 (24%) of French medical schools had either introduced related curriculum or implemented a COI-related policy. Of these, only 1 (2.5%) had restrictive policies for any category. No official COI policies were found at any of the schools. However, at 2 (5%), informal policies were reported. The maximum score per faculty was 5/26, with 28 (76%) scoring 0. CONCLUSION: This is the first survey in France to examine COI policies at medical faculties. We found little evidence that protection of medical students from undue commercial influence is a priority, either through institutional policies or education. This is despite national transparency legislation on industry financing of health professionals and limits on gifts. The French National Medical Students Association (ANEMF) has called for more attention to COI in medical education; our results strongly support such a call.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0168258

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 22 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [32]Korn D, Carlat D (2013) Recommendations From the Pew Task Force on Medical Conflicts of Interest, JAMA, Vol. 310, n° 22, 12 11. 24327035

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Scheffer, P., Guy-Coichard, C., Outh-Gauer, D., Calet-Froissart, Z., Boursier, M., Mintzes, B., & Borde, J.-S.
Affiliations
  • Université Paris 8 (FR)
  • Hôpital Saint-Antoine (FR)
  • Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier (FR)
  • Aix-Marseille Université (FR)
  • Université de Rennes (FR)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Scheffer, Paul
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2017-01-09
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
e0168258
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2568226056
Cited by
42
References
22
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
3.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
Keywords
conflict of interest policies, medical education, course program, transparency law
MeSH terms
Faculty, Medical, France, Humans, Surveys and Questionnaires, Schools, Medical, Conflict of Interest, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review