Cited by 11Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestockGenetic diversity and population structureEvolution and Genetic Dynamics

Contribution of both positive selection and relaxation of selective constraints to degeneration of flyability during geese domestication

Open access
Wang, Ye, Hu, Yaodong, He, Daqian, Chen, Shiyi, Li, Siming, Lan, Dan, Ren, Peng, Lin, Zhenping +1 more·2017·PLoS ONE

Abstract

Flyability is the most discrepant trait between modern-day geese and their wild ancestors, and the degeneration of flyability is a key marker of the successful domestication of wild geese. In light of the relatively short history of domestic geese, intense artificial selection is thought to play an important role in the degeneration of flyability. However, the underlying mechanism behind this phenomenon has seldom been investigated. In this study, we applied a molecular evolutionary approach to the evaluation of partial breeds of domestic geese in order to look for genes involved in the selection pressure toward degeneration of flyability. The haplotype networks, pairwise fixation index (FST) values, and analysis of molecular variance results all clearly illustrated a population variance between Landes geese and partial Chinese domestic geese. We also detected signatures of positive artificial selection in the COX2 and COX3 genes, and related selection in the HBB gene. Our results support the independent origins of partial European domestic geese and Chinese domestic geese. In addition, both positive artificial selection and the relaxation of functional constraints appeared to play important roles in the degeneration of flyability in domestic geese.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0185328

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This may explain the reduced locomotion ability, including flying, in domesticated poultry.

    “This may explain the reduced locomotion ability (including flying) in domesticated poultry (Wang et al. 2017; Stover et al. 2018).”

    From Genomic Analyses Unveil Helmeted Guinea Fowl (<i>Numida meleagris</i>) Domestication in West Africa (2021) · cites this paper as Wang et al. 2017

    The Introduction (page unavailable) reports poor flying performance in domestic geese, and the Discussion (page unavailable) suggests that domestication-related selection contributed to their loss of flyability. The paper does not establish reduced locomotion more broadly or extend the finding to domesticated poultry generally. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [2]Mannermaa K. Goose: Domestication: Springer New York; 2014 3096– 8 p.
  2. [3]Ericson PG, Tyrberg T. The early history of the Swedish avifauna: a review of the subfossil record and early written sources: Kungl. vitterhets historie och antikvitets akademien; 2004.
  3. [23]McCracken KG, Barger CP, Sorenson MD. Phylogenetic and structural analysis of the HbA (α A/β A) and HbD (α D/β A) hemoglobin genes in two high-altitude waterfowl from the Himalayas and the Andes: Bar-headed goose (Anser indicus) and Andean goose (Chloephaga melanoptera). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 2010; 56(2): 649– 58. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2010.04.034 20434566 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, Y., Hu, Y., He, D., Chen, S., Li, S., Lan, D., Ren, P., Lin, Z., & Liu, Y.
Affiliations
  • Sichuan Agricultural University (CN)
  • Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CN)
  • Jiangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CN)
  • Shantou University (CN)
Corresponding author
Liu, Yiping
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2017-09-25
Volume
12
Issue
9
Pages
e0185328
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2756993043
Cited by
11
References
32
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2
FWCI
0.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (31660663)
  • National Waterfowl Industrial Technology System (CARS-43-4)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
Keywords
domestication, geese, selective breeding, positive selection, relaxed selection, cyclooxygenase-2, cox3, HBB, haplotype network, genetic differentiation
MeSH terms
Domestication, Animals, Animals, Domestic, Animals, Wild, Breeding, China, Europe, Flight, Animal, Geese, Haplotypes, Hemoglobins, Prostaglandin-Endoperoxide Synthases, Selection, Genetic, Genetic Variation, Evolution, Molecular, Avian Proteins, Cyclooxygenase 2

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review