Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 223

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Fisher’s exact approach for post hoc analysis of a chi-squared test

Open access
Shan, Guogen, Gerstenberger, Shawn·2017·PLOS ONE

Abstract

This research is motivated by one of our survey studies to assess the potential influence of introducing zebra mussels to the Lake Mead National Recreation Area, Nevada.One research question in this study is to investigate the association between the boating activity type and the awareness of zebra mussels.A chi-squared test is often used for testing independence between two factors with nominal levels.When the null hypothesis of independence between two factors is rejected, we are often left wondering where does the significance come from.Cell residuals, including standardized residuals and adjusted residuals, are traditionally used in testing for cell significance, which is often known as a post hoc test after a statistically significant chi-squared test.In practice, the limiting distributions of these residuals are utilized for statistical inference.However, they may lead to different conclusions based on the calculated p-values, and their p-values could be over-o6r under-estimated due to the unsatisfactory performance of asymptotic approaches with regards to type I error control.In this article, we propose new exact p-values by using Fisher's approach based on three commonly used test statistics to order the sample space.We theoretically prove that the proposed new exact p-values based on these test statistics are the same.Based on our extensive simulation studies, we show that the existing asymptotic approach based on adjusted residual is often more likely to reject the null hypothesis as compared to the exact approach due to the inflated family-wise error rates as observed.We would recommend the proposed exact p-value for use in practice as a valuable post hoc analysis technique for chi-squared analysis. BackgroundThis research is motivated by one survey study conducted by Gerstenberger et al. [1] to assess potential influence of introducing zebra mussels to the Lake Mead National Recreation Area (LMNRA), Nevada, USA.Zebra mussels are relative small (finger-nail-sized for adult zebra mussels).Their extremely high reproductive rates raise the concern that they could clog water intakes in the LMNRA as it is the main water resource for the city [2].They can be easily moved from an affected lake to an unaffected one by attaching to boats, nets, docks, and so on.In this study, surveys approved by United States Fish and Wildlife Service were used

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0188709

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 223

Metadata

Authors
Shan, G., & Gerstenberger, S.
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2017-12-20
Volume
12
Issue
12
Pages
e0188709
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2777024363
Cited by
223
References
3
FWCI
6.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fisher’s exact approach for post hoc analysis of a chi-squared test. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pone.0188709
The paper
Shan, G., & Gerstenberger, S. (2017). Fisher’s exact approach for post hoc analysis of a chi-squared test. PLOS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0188709

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.