Cited by 8Video Surveillance and Tracking MethodsAutonomous Vehicle Technology and SafetyVehicle License Plate Recognition

Improving vehicle tracking rate and speed estimation in dusty and snowy weather conditions with a vibrating camera

Open access
Yaghoobi Ershadi, Nastaran·2017·PLOS ONE

Abstract

Traffic surveillance systems are interesting to many researchers to improve the traffic control and reduce the risk caused by accidents. In this area, many published works are only concerned about vehicle detection in normal conditions. The camera may vibrate due to wind or bridge movement. Detection and tracking of vehicles is a very difficult task when we have bad weather conditions in winter (snowy, rainy, windy, etc.), dusty weather in arid and semi-arid regions, at night, etc. Also, it is very important to consider speed of vehicles in the complicated weather condition. In this paper, we improved our method to track and count vehicles in dusty weather with vibrating camera. For this purpose, we used a background subtraction based strategy mixed with an extra processing to segment vehicles. In this paper, the extra processing included the analysis of the headlight size, location, and area. In our work, tracking was done between consecutive frames via a generalized particle filter to detect the vehicle and pair the headlights using the connected component analysis. So, vehicle counting was performed based on the pairing result, with Centroid of each blob we calculated distance between two frames by simple formula and hence dividing it by the time between two frames obtained from the video. Our proposed method was tested on several video surveillance records in different conditions such as dusty or foggy weather, vibrating camera, and in roads with medium-level traffic volumes. The results showed that the new proposed method performed better than our previously published method and other methods, including the Kalman filter or Gaussian model, in different traffic conditions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0189145

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The vehicle tracking and counting system in [113] for sandy weather with camera shaking had trouble identifying white automobiles in snowy settings.

    “While the method worked well in difficult situations, such as evenings and sandy weather, with a vibrating camera, it had trouble identifying white automobiles in snowy settings.”

    From Object Detection in Autonomous Vehicles under Adverse Weather: A Review of Traditional and Deep Learning Approaches (2024) · cites this paper as [113]

    The Introduction and previous works section reports that an earlier method was robust in bright nights, snowy and dusty weather with a vibrating camera, but that white cars far from the camera were hard to detect in snow. It presents this as a limitation motivating improvements, not as a demonstrated limitation of the improved method in the cited paper. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [5]Meshram S. A. and Raskar V. B. “ Vehicle detection and tracking techniques used in moving vehicles,” International Journal of Innovative Science, Engineering and Technology, vol. 2, no. 7, 2015.
  2. [6]Tripathi J., Chaudharya K., Joshia A., and Jawaleb J. B. “ Automatic vehicle counting and classification,” International Journal of Innovative and Emerging. Research in Engineering, vol. 2, no. 4, 2015.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yaghoobi Ershadi, N.
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2017-12-20
Volume
12
Issue
12
Pages
e0189145
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2780920736
Cited by
8
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Video Surveillance and Tracking Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Media Technology › Vehicle License Plate Recognition
Keywords
vehicle tracking, vehicle speed estimation, vehicle counting, traffic monitoring, background subtraction, connected component analysis, centroid tracking
MeSH terms
Dust, Models, Theoretical, Photography, Snow, Vibration, Motor Vehicles

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review