CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 184Marine Ecology and Invasive SpeciesEcology and Vegetation Dynamics StudiesCoastal and Marine Management

Historical baselines in marine bioinvasions: Implications for policy and management

Open access
Ojaveer, Henn, Galil, Bella S., Carlton, James T., Alleway, Heidi, Goulletquer, Philippe, Lehtiniemi, Maiju, Marchini, Agnese, Miller, Whitman +5 more·2018·PLOS ONE
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0202383PMC PMC6095587
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

The human-mediated introduction of marine non-indigenous species is a centuries- if not millennia-old phenomenon, but was only recently acknowledged as a potent driver of change in the sea. We provide a synopsis of key historical milestones for marine bioinvasions, including timelines of (a) discovery and understanding of the invasion process, focusing on transfer mechanisms and outcomes, (b) methodologies used for detection and monitoring, (c) approaches to ecological impacts research, and (d) management and policy responses. Early (until the mid-1900s) marine bioinvasions were given little attention, and in a number of cases actively and routinely facilitated. Beginning in the second half of the 20th century, several conspicuous non-indigenous species outbreaks with strong environmental, economic, and public health impacts raised widespread concerns and initiated shifts in public and scientific perceptions. These high-profile invasions led to policy documents and strategies to reduce the introduction and spread of non-indigenous species, although with significant time lags and limited success and focused on only a subset of transfer mechanisms. Integrated, multi-vector management within an ecosystem-based marine management context is urgently needed to address the complex interactions of natural and human pressures that drive invasions in marine ecosystems.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0202383

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The literature of marine invasions sorely lacks scientific articles showing the evolution of invaded sites over several decades.

    “Unfortunately, the literature of marine invasions sorely lacks scientific articles showing the evolution of invaded sites over several decades (Strayer et al. 2017; Ojaveer et al. 2018).”

    From Bioinvasion impacts on biodiversity, ecosystem services, and human health in the Mediterranean Sea (2022) · cites this paper as Ojaveer et al. 2018

    The Introduction (page unavailable) describes a lack of quantitative, high-resolution analyses of marine bioinvasion histories. The Field surveys section (page unavailable) says repeated community-level surveys are rare and historical records generally do not allow comparisons across time. These passages support a shortage of evidence on how invasions change, but do not specifically establish a shortage of scientific articles tracking invaded sites over several decades. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 338 · Cited by 184

Research works printed but not linked: 338

  1. [1]Lotze HK, Reise K, Worm B, van Beusekom J, Busch M, Ehlers A, et al Human transformations of the Wadden Sea ecosystem through time: a synthesis. Helgol Mar Res. 2005; 59(1): 84– 95. 10.1007/s10152-004-0209-z · DOI
  2. [2]Halpern BS, Walbridge S, Selkoe KA, Kappel CV, Micheli F, D'Agrosa C, et al A global map of human impact on marine ecosystems. Science. 2008; 319(5865): 948– 952. 10.1126/science.1149345 18276889 · DOI · Paper page
  3. [3]Costello MJ, Coll M, Danovaro R, Halpin P, Ojaveer H, Miloslavich P. A census of marine biodiversity knowledge, resources and future challenges. PLoS ONE. 2010; 5(8): e12110 10.1371/journal.pone.0012110 20689850 PMC2914025 · DOI
  4. [4]Occhipinti Ambrogi A. Global change and marine communities: alien species and climate change. Mar Poll Bull. 2007; 55(7–9): 342– 352. 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2006.11.014 17239404 · DOI
  5. [5]Directive 2008/56/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 17 June 2008 establishing a framework for community action in the field of marine environmental policy (Marine Strategy Framework Directive). European Commission. Official Journal of the European Union. 2008;L164/19 (Jun 25, 2008).
  6. [6]Stelzenmüller V, Coll M, Mazaris AAD, Giakoumi S, Katsanevakis S, Portman ME, et al A risk-based approach to cumulative effect assessments for marine management. Sci Total Environ. 2018; 612: 1132– 1140. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.289 28892857 · DOI
  7. [8]Ruiz GM, Fofonoff PW, Carlton JT, Wonham MJ, Hines AH. Invasion of coastal marine communities in North America: apparent patterns, processes, and biases. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 2000; 31: 481– 531. 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.31.1.481 · DOI
  8. [9]Galil BS, Marchini A, Occhipinti-Ambrogi A, Minchin D, Narščius A, Ojaveer H, et al International arrivals: widespread bioinvasions in European Seas. Ethol Ecol Evol. 2014; 26(2–3): 152– 171. 10.1080/03949370.2014.897651 24899770 PMC4034525 · DOI
  9. [10]Pauly D. Anecdotes and the shifting baseline syndrome of fisheries. Trends Ecol Evol. 1995; 10: 430 10.1016/S0169-5347(00)89171-5 21237093 · DOI
  10. [11]Klein ES, Thurstan RH. Acknowledging long-term ecological change: The problem of shifting baselines In: Schwerdtner Máñez K, Poulsen B, editors. Perspectives on oceans past. Dordrecht: Springer; 2016 pp. 11– 29.
  11. [12]Carlton JT. Deep invasion ecology and the assembly of communities in historical time In: Rilov G, Crooks JA, editors. Biological invasions in marine ecosystems. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2009 pp. 13– 56.
  12. [13]Carlton JT. Patterns of transoceanic marine biological invasions in the Pacific Ocean. Bull Mar Sci. 1987; 41: 452– 465.
  13. [14]Carlton JT. Molluscan invasions in marine and estuarine communities. Malacologia. 1999; 41(2): 439– 454.
  14. [15]Carlton JT. Community assembly and historical biogeography in the North Atlantic Ocean: the potential role of human-mediated dispersal vectors. Hydrobiologia. 2003; 503(1–3): 1– 8. 10.1023/B:HYDR.0000008479.90581.e1 · DOI
  15. [16]Carlton JT. The inviolate sea? Charles Elton and biological invasions in the world's oceans In: Richardson DM, editor. Fifty years of invasion ecology. The legacy of Charles Elton. Oxford (England): Wiley-Blackwell; 2011 pp. 25– 33.
  16. [17]Roman J. Diluting the founder effect: cryptic invasions expand a marine invader’s range. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2006; 273: 2453– 2459. 10.1098/rspb.2006.3597 16959635 PMC1634897 · DOI
  17. [18]Blakeslee AMH, Kamakukra Y, Onufrey J, Makino W, Urabe J, Park S, et al Reconstructing the invasion history of the Asian shorecrab, Hemigrapsus sanguineus (De Haan 1835) in the western Atlantic. Mar Biol. 2017; 164: 47 10.1007/s00227-017-3069-1 · DOI
  18. [19]Carlton JT, Chapman JW, Geller JB, Miller JA, Carlton DA, McCuller MI, et al Tsunami-driven rafting: Transoceanic species dispersal and implications for marine biogeography. Science. 2017; 357(6358): 1402– 1406. 10.1126/science.aao1498 28963256 · DOI · Paper page
  19. [20]Casson L. Ships and seamanship in the ancient world 1st ed. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1971.
  20. [21]Woodman R. The history of the ship: The comprehensive story of seafaring from the earliest times to the present day 1st ed. London: Conway Maritime Press; 1997.
  21. [22]Barnett R, Yamaguchi N, Shapiro B, Sabin R. Ancient DNA analysis indicates the first English lions originated from North Africa. Contrib Zool. 2008; 77: 7– 16.
  22. [23]Sadler J. Beetles, boats and biogeography: insect invaders of the North Atlantic. Acta Archaeol. 1990; 61: 199– 211.
  23. [24]Buckland PC, Panagiotakopulu E, Sveinbjarnardottir G. A failed invader in the North Atlantic, the case of Aglenus brunneus Gyll. (Col., Colydiidae), a blind flightless beetle from Iceland. Biol Invasions. 2009; 11(6): 1239– 1245. 10.1007/s10530-008-9339-6 · DOI
  24. [25]Petersen KS, Rasmussen KL, Heinemeler J, Rud N. Clams before Columbus? Nature. 1992; 359(6397): 679 10.1038/359679a0 · DOI
  25. [27]Cross ME, Bradley CR, Cross TF, Culloty S, Lynch S, McGinnity P, et al Genetic evidence supports recolonisation by Mya arenaria of Western Europe from North America. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2016; 549: 99– 112. 10.3354/meps11672 · DOI
  26. [28]Panova M, Blakeslee AMH, Miller AW, Makinen T, Ruiz GM, Johannesson K, et al Glacial history of the North Atlantic marine snail, Littorina saxatilis, inferred from distribution of mitochondrial DNA lineages. PLoS ONE. 2011; 6(3): e17511 10.1371/journal.pone.0017511 21412417 PMC3055875 · DOI
  27. [29]Chapman JW, Blakeslee AMH, Carlton JT, Bellinger MR. Parsimony dictates a human introduction: on the use of genetic and other data to distinguish between the natural and human-mediated invasion of the European snail Littorina littorea in North America. Biol Invasions. 2008; 10(2): 131– 133. 10.1007/s10530-007-9115-z · DOI
  28. [30]Audet D, Miron G, Moriyasu M. Biological characteristics of a newly established green crab (Carcinus maenas) population in the southern Gulf of St. Lawrence, Canada. J Shellfish Res. 2008; 27: 427– 441. 10.2983/0730-8000(2008)27[427:BCOANE]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  29. [31]Edgell T, Hollander J 2011. The evolutionary ecology of European green crab, Carcinus maenas, in North America In: Galil BS, Clark PF, Carlton JT, editors. In the wrong place: alien marine crustaceans—distribution, biology and impacts. Dordrecht: Springer; 2011 pp. 641– 659.
  30. [32]Carlton JT, Ruiz GM. The magnitude and consequences of bioinvasions in marine ecosystems: implications for conservation biology In: Norse EA, Crowder LB, editors. Marine conservation biology: The science of maintaining the sea's biodiversity. Washington DC: Island Press; 2005 pp. 123– 148.
  31. [33]Kooistra WHCF, Verbruggen H. Genetic patterns in the calcified tropical seaweeds Halimeda opuntia, H. distorta, H. hederacea, and H. minima (Bryopsidales, Chlorophyta) provide insights in species boundaries and interoceanic dispersal. J Phycol. 2005; 41: 177– 187. 10.1111/j.1529-8817.2005.04095.x · DOI
  32. [34]Bortolus A, Carlton JT, Schwindt E. Reimagining South American coasts: unveiling the hidden invasion history of an iconic ecological engineer. Divers Distrib. 2015; 21(11): 1267– 1283. 10.1111/ddi.12377 · DOI
  33. [35]Lindroth CH. The faunal connections between Europe and North America 1st ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons Inc.; 1957.
  34. [36]Carlton JT, Hodder J. Biogeography and dispersal of coastal marine organisms: experimental studies on a replica of a 16th-century sailing vessel. Mar Biol. 1995; 121: 721– 730. 10.1007/BF00349308 · DOI
  35. [37]Carlton JT. The scale and ecological consequences of biological invasions in the world’s oceans In: Sandlund OT, Schei PJ, Viken Å, editors. Invasive species and biodiversity management. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1999 pp. 195– 212.
  36. [38]Mack RN. Global plant dispersal, naturalization, and invasion: pathways, modes, and circumstances In: Ruiz GM, Carlton JT, editors. Invasive species. Vectors and management strategies. Washington: Island Press; 2003 pp. 3– 30.
  37. [39]Blakeslee AMH, Byers JE, Lesser MP. Solving cryptogenic histories using host and parasite molecular genetics: the resolution of Littorina littorea's North American origin. Mol Ecol. 2008; 17: 3684– 3696. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008.03865.x 18643882 · DOI
  38. [40]Brawley SH, Coyer JA, Blakeslee AMH, Hoarau G, Johnson LE, Byers JE, et al Historical invasions of the intertidal zone of Atlantic North America associated with distinctive patterns of trade and emigration. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009; 106: 8239– 8244. 10.1073/pnas.0812300106 19416814 PMC2677092 · DOI
  39. [41]Carlton JT. Invertebrates, Marine In: Simberloff D, Rejmanek M, editors. Encyclopedia of biological invasions. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2011 pp. 385– 390.
  40. [42]Carlton JT, Cohen AN. Episodic global dispersal in shallow water marine organisms: the case history of the European shore crabs Carcinus maenas and Carcinus aestuarii. J Biogeogr. 2003; 30: 1809– 1820. 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2003.00962.x · DOI
  41. [44]Talley WK. Ocean container shipping: impacts of a technological improvement. J Econ Issues. 2000; 34, 933– 948. 10.1080/00213624.2000.11506322 · DOI
  42. [45]Barki D, Deleze-Black L. Review of maritime transport New York and Geneva: United Nations Publication; 2016. UNCTAD/RMT/2016, ISBN 978-92-1-112904-5.
  43. [46]Fremont A. Global maritime networks: The case of Maersk. J Transp Geogr. 2007; 15(6): 431– 442. 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2007.01.005 · DOI
  44. [47]Seebens H, Schwartz N, Schupp PJ, Blasius B. Predicting the spread of marine species introduced by global shipping. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016; 113(20): 5646– 5651. 10.1073/pnas.1524427113 27091983 PMC4878520 · DOI
  45. [50]Hewitt CL, Gollasch S, Minchin D. The vessel as a vector—biofouling, ballast water and sediments In: Rilov G, Crooks JA, editors. Biological invasions in marine ecosystems: ecological, management, and geographic perspectives. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 2009 pp. 117– 131.
  46. [51]Coutts ADM. Slow-moving barge introduces biosecurity risk to the Marlborough Sounds, New Zealand. In: Godwin LS, editor. Hull fouling as a mechanism for marine invasive species introductions. Proceedings of a workshop on current issues and potential management strategies; 2003 Feb 12–13; Honolulu, Hawaii. Honolulu: Hawaii Department of Agriculture; 2005. pp. 29–36.
  47. [52]Coutts ADM, Piola RF, Taylor MD, Hewitt CL, Gardner JPA. The effect of vessel speed on the survivorship of biofouling organisms at different hull locations. Biofouling 2010; 26(5): 539– 553. 10.1080/08927014.2010.492469 20526914 · DOI
  48. [54]Koplovitz G, Shmue Y, Shenkar N. Floating docks in tropical environments—a reservoir for the opportunistic ascidian Herdmania momus. Manag Biol Invasion. 2016; 7(1): 43– 50. 10.3391/mbi.2016.7.1.06 · DOI
  49. [55]Oguz T, Fach B, Salihoglu B. Invasion dynamics of the alien ctenophore Mnemiopsis leidyi and its impact on anchovy collapse in the Black Sea. J Plankton Res. 2008; 30(12): 1385– 1397. 10.1093/plankt/fbn094 · DOI
  50. [56]Nalepa TF, Schloesser DW. Quagga and zebra mussels: biology, impacts, and control 2nd ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2013.
  51. [57]Hallegraeff GM. Harmful algal blooms in the Australian region. Mar Pollut Bull. 1992; 25(5–8): 186– 190. 10.1016/0025-326X(92)90223-S · DOI
  52. [58]Floerl O, Inglis GJ. Starting the invasion pathway: the interaction between source populations and human transport vectors. Biol Invasions. 2015; 7(4): 589– 606. 10.1007/s10530-004-0952-8 · DOI
  53. [59]Davidson IC, Zabin CJ, Chang AL, Brown CW, Sytsma MD, Ruiz GM. Recreational boats as potential vectors of marine organisms at an invasion hotspot. Aquat Biol. 2010; 11: 179– 191. 10.3354/ab00302 · DOI
  54. [60]Clarke Murray C, Pakhomov EA, Therriault TW. Recreational boating: a large unregulated vector transporting marine invasive species. Divers Distrib. 12011; 7(6): 1161– 1172. 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2011.00798.x · DOI
  55. [61]Ashton G, Davidson I, Ruiz G. Transient small boats as a long-distance coastal vector for dispersal of biofouling organisms. Estuaries Coast. 2014; 37(6): 1572– 1581. 10.1007/s12237-014-9782-9 · DOI
  56. [62]Zabin C, Ashton GV, Brown CW, Davidson IC, Sytsma MD, Ruiz GM. Small boats provide connectivity for nonindigenous marine species between a highly invaded international port and nearby coastal harbors. Manag Biol Invasion. 2014; 5: 97– 112. 10.3391/mbi.2014.5.2.03 · DOI
  57. [64]National Marine Manufacturers Association [internet]. NMMA releases 2010 U.S. recreational boat registration statistics report [about 2 screens]. [cited 2017 Jul 15]. Available from: http://www.nmma.org/press/article/18028
  58. [65]Minchin D, Floerl O, Savini D, Occhipinti-Ambrogi A. Small craft and the spread of exotic species In: Davenport L L., Davenport J, editors. The ecology of transportation: managing mobility for the environment. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2006 pp. 99– 118.
  59. [67]Fletcher LM, Zaiko A, Atalah J, Richter I, Dufour CM, Pochon X, et al Bilge water as a vector for the spread of marine pests: a morphological, metabarcoding and experimental assessment. Biol Invasions. 2017; 19(10): 2851– 2867. 10.1007/s10530-017-1489-y · DOI
  60. [68]Ferrario J, Caronni S, Occhipinti-Ambrogi A, Marchini A. Role of commercial harbours and recreational marinas in the spread of non-indigenous fouling species. Biofouling. 2017; 33(8): 651– 660. 10.1080/08927014.2017.1351958 28786306 · DOI
  61. [69]Clarke Murray C, Gartner H, Gregr EJ, Chan K, Pakhomov E, Therriault TW. Spatial distribution of marine invasive species: environmental, demographic and vector drivers. Divers Distrib. 2014; 20(7): 824– 836. 10.1111/ddi.12215 · DOI
  62. [70]Bax N, Hewitt C, Campbell M, Thresher R. Man-made marinas as sheltered islands for alien marine organisms: Establishment and eradication of an alien invasive marine species In: Veitch CR, Clout MN, editors. Turning the tide: the eradication of invasive species. IUCN SSC Invasive Species Specialist Group. Gland Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN; 2002 pp. 26– 39.
  63. [72]Bell JD, Bartley DM, Lorenzen K, Loneragan NR. Restocking and stock enhancement of coastal fisheries: Potential, problems and progress. Fish Res. 2006; 80(1): 1– 8. 10.1016/j.fishres.2006.03.008 · DOI
  64. [73]Lorenzen K. Understanding and managing enhancement fisheries systems. Rev Fish Sci. 2008; 16: 10– 23. 10.1080/10641260701790291 · DOI
  65. [74]Günther R. The oyster culture of the ancient Romans. J Mar Biol Assoc UK. 1897; 4(4): 360– 365. 10.1017/S0025315400005488 · DOI
  66. [76]Kristensen PS. Oyster and mussel fisheries in Denmark. In: MacKenzie CLJr, Burrell VGJr, Rosenfield A, Hobart WL, editors. The history, present conditions, and future of the molluscan fisheries of north and central America and Europe: Volume 3, Europe. Seattle: NOAA Technical Report NMFS 129; 1997. pp. 25–47.
  67. [77]Hinard G, Lambert L. Tableau de l'ostréiculture française (deuxième partie). Rev Trav Off Pêches Marit. 1928; 1(4): 61– 127. French.
  68. [78]Lambert L. Note complémentaire sur le clam Venus mercenaria. Rev Trav Off Pêches Marit. 1947–1949; 15(1–4): 118– 122. French.
  69. [82]Goulletquer P, Heral M. Marine molluscan production trends in France: from fisheries to aquaculture. In: MacKenzie CLJr, Burrell VGJr, Rosenfield A, Hobart WL, editors. The history, present conditions, and future of the molluscan fisheries of north and central America and Europe: Volume 3, Europe. Seattle: NOAA Technical Report NMFS 129; 1997. pp. 137–164.
  70. [83]Chew KK. Global bivalve shellfish introductions. World Aquacult. 1990; 21: 9– 21.
  71. [84]Lindsay C, Simons D. The Fisheries for Olympia oysters, Ostreola canchaphila; Pacific oysters, Crassostrea gigas; and Pacific razor clams, Siliqua patula, in the State of Washington. In: MacKenzie CL Jr, Burrell VG Jr, Rosenfield A, Hobart WL, editors. The history, present condition and future of the molluscan fisheries of North, and Central America and Europe. Volume 2, Pacific coast and supplemental topics. Seattle: NOAA Technical Report NMMFS, 128; 1997. pp. 89–113.
  72. [85]Quayle DB. Distribution of introduced marine mollusca in British Columbia Waters. J Fish Res Board Can. 1964; 21: 1155– 1181. 10.1139/f64-102 · DOI
  73. [86]Ayres P. Introduction of Pacific oysters in Australia In: Leffler M, Greer J, editors. The ecology of Crassostrea gigas in Australia, New Zealand, France and Washington State. College Park: Maryland Sea Grant College; 1991 pp. 3– 8.
  74. [88]Haupt TM, Griffiths CL, Robinson TB, Tonin AFG, De Bruin PA. The history and status of oyster exploitation and culture in South Africa. J Shellfish Res. 2010; 29(1): 151– 159. 10.2983/035.029.0109 · DOI
  75. [90]Orensanz JM, Schwindt E, Pastorino G, Bortolus A, Casas G, Darrigran G, et al No longer the pristine confines of the world ocean: a survey of exotic marine species in the southwestern Atlantic. Biol Invasions. 2002; 4: 115– 143. 10.1023/A:1020596916153 · DOI
  76. [93]Carlton JT. Marine bioinvasions: the alteration of marine ecosystems by nonindigenous species. Oceanography. 1996; 9(1): 36– 43.
  77. [95]Weimin M. Status of aquaculture of Penaeus vannamei in China In: Sulit VT, Aldon MET, Tendencia IT, Ortiz AMJ, Alayon SB, Ledesma AS, editors. Regional technical consultation on the aquaculture of P. vannamei and other exotic shrimps in southeast Asia, Manila, Philippines. Manila: SEAFDEC Aquaculture Department; 2005 pp. 84– 91.
  78. [96]Funge-Smith S, Briggs M. 2005 The introduction of Penaeus vannamei and P stylirostris into the Asia-Pacific region. In: Bartley DM, Bhujel RC, Funge-Smith S, Olin PG, Phillips MJ, editors. International mechanisms for the control and responsible use of alien species in aquatic ecosystems. Report of an Ad Hoc Expert Consultation; 2003 Aug 27–30; Xishuangbanna, People's Republic of China. Rome: FAO; 2005. pp. 149–168. Available from: http://www.fao.org/docrep/009/a0113e/a0113e00.htm
  79. [98]Breber P. Introduction and acclimatisation of the Pacific carpet clam, Tapes philippinarum, to Italian waters In: Leppäkoski E, Gollasch S, Olenin S, editors. Invasive aquatic species of Europe. Distribution, impacts and management. Dordrecht: Kluwer; 2002 pp. 120– 126.
  80. [99]Humphreys J, Caldow RWG, McGrorty S, West AD, Jensen AC. Population dynamics of naturalised Manila clams Ruditapes philippinarum in British coastal waters. Mar Biol. 2007; 151: 2255– 2270. 10.1007/s00227-007-0660-x · DOI
  81. [100]De Montaudouin X, Arzul I, Caill-Milly N, Khayati A, Labrousse JM, Lafitte C, et al Asari clam (Ruditapes philippinarum) in France: history of an exotic species 1972–2015. Bulletin of Japan Fisheries Research and Education Agency. 2016; 42: 35– 42. Available from: http://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00366/47767/.
  82. [101]Ruano F, Sobral DV. Marine non-indigenous species–current situation in Portugal. In: Rodrigues L, Reino L, Godinho LO, Freitas H, editors. Proceedings of the 1st Symposium on Nonindigenous Species: Introduction, Causes and Consequences. Lisboa: Liga para a Protecção da Natureza; 2000. pp. 58–63.
  83. [102]Blaxter JHS. The enhancement of marine fish stocks. Adv Mar Biol. 2000; 38: 1– 54. 10.1016/S0065-2881(00)38002-6 · DOI
  84. [104]Orlov YuI Ivanov BG. On the introduction of the Kamchatka king crab Paralithodes camtschatica (Decapoda: Anomura: Lithodidae) into the Barents Sea. Mar Biol. 1978; 48(4): 373– 375. 10.1007/BF00391642. · DOI
  85. [105]Baltz DM. Introduced fishes in marine systems and inland seas. Biol Conserv. 1991; 56: 151– 177. 10.1016/0006-3207(91)90015-2 · DOI
  86. [106]Arbaciauskas K. Ponto-Caspian amphipods and mysids in the inland waters of Lithuania: history of introduction, current distribution and relations with native malacostracans In: Leppäkoski E, Gollasch S, Olenin S, editors. Invasive aquatic species of Europe: Distribution, impacts and management. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2002 pp. 104– 115.
  87. [107]Berezina NA, Petryashev VV, Razinkovas A, Lesutienė J. Alien Malacostracan crustaceans in the eastern Baltic Sea: Pathways and consequences. In: Galil BS, Clark PF, Carlton JT, editors. In the wrong place—alien marine crustaceans: Distribution, biology and impacts. Invading Nature—Springer Series in Invasion Ecology; 2011. pp. 301–322.
  88. [108]Born AF, Immink AJ, Bartley DM. Marine and coastal stocking: global status and information needs In: Bartley DM, Leber KM, editors. Marine ranching. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper 429. Rome: FAO; 2004 pp. 1– 18.
  89. [109]Wang Q, Zhuang Z, Deng J, Ye Y. Stock enhancement and translocation of the shrimp Penaeus chinensis in China. Fish Res. 2006; 80(1): 67– 79. 10.1016/j.fishres.2006.03.015 · DOI
  90. [110]Cao L, Chen Y, Dong S, Hanson A, Huang B, Leadbitter D, et al Opportunity for marine fisheries reform in China. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017; 114(3): 435– 442. 10.1073/pnas.1616583114 28096504 PMC5255632 · DOI
  91. [112]Activité de l'Institut des Pêches en 1979. Principales actions en matière de cultures marines. Science et Pêche. Bull Inst Pêche Marit. 1980; 306: 1– 39. French.
  92. [113]Boudouresque CF, Gerbal M, Knoepffler-Peguy M. L'algue japonnaise Undaria pinnatifida (Phaeophyceae, Laminariales) en Méditerranée. Phycologia. 1985; 24(3): 364– 266. French. 10.2216/i0031-8884-24-3-364.1 · DOI
  93. [114]Floc'h JY, Pajot R, Wallentinus I. The Japanese brown alga Undaria pinnatifida on the coast of France and its possible establishment in European waters. ICES J Mar Sci. 1991; 47(3): 379– 390. 10.1093/icesjms/47.3.379 · DOI
  94. [115]Floc’h JY, Pajot R, Mouret V. Undaria pinnatifida (Laminariales, Phaeophyta) 12 years after its introduction into the Atlantic Ocean. In: Lindstrom SC, Chapman DJ, editors. Fifteenth International Seaweed Symposium; 1995 Jan; Valdivia, Chile. Developments in Hydrobiology. Dordrecht: Springer. 1996;116(326/327): 217–222. 10.1007/978-94-009-1659-3_30 · DOI
  95. [117]Mineur F, Belsher T, Johnson MP, Maggs CA, Verlaque M. Experimental assessment of oyster transfers as a vector for macroalgal introductions. Biol Conserv. 2007; 137(2): 237– 247. 10.1016/j.biocon.2007.02.001 · DOI
  96. [118]Barille L, Le Bris A, Meleder V, Launeau P, Roobin M, Louvrou I, et al Photosynthetic epibionts and endobionts of Pacific oyster shells from oyster reefs in rocky versus mudflat shores. PLoS ONE. 2017; 12(9): e0185187 10.1371/journal.pone.0185187 28934317 PMC5608347 · DOI
  97. [119]Engelen AH, Serebryakova A, Ang P, Britton-Simmons K, Mineur F, Pedersen MF, et al Circumglobal invasion by the brown seaweed Sargassum muticum. Oceanogr Mar Biol. 2015; 53: 81– 126.
  98. [121]Salini J, Shaklee JB. Genetic structure of barramundi (Lates calcarifer) stocks from northern Australia. Mar Freshw Res. 1988; 39(3): 317– 329. 10.1071/MF9880317 · DOI
  99. [122]Araki H, Schmid C. Is hatchery stocking a help or harm?: Evidence, limitations and future directions in ecological and genetic surveys. Aquaculture. 2010; 308: S2– S11. 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2010.05.036 · DOI
  100. [123]Blanco Gonzalez E, Nagasawa K, Umino T. Stock enhancement program for black sea bream (Acanthopagrus schlegelii) in Hiroshima Bay: monitoring the genetic effects. Aquaculture. 2008; 276: 36– 43. 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2008.02.004 · DOI
  101. [124]Hansen MM, Fraser DJ, Meier K, Mensberg K-LD. Sixty years of anthropogenic pressure: a spatio-temporal genetic analysis of brown trout populations subject to stocking and population declines. Mol Ecol. 2009; 18(12): 2549– 2562. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2009.04198.x 19457206 · DOI
  102. [125]Laikre L, Schwartz MK, Waples RS, Ryman N. Compromising genetic diversity in the wild: unmonitored large-scale release of plants and animals. Trends Ecol Evol. 2010; 25: 520– 529. 10.1016/j.tree.2010.06.013 20688414 · DOI
  103. [127]Pichot Y, Comps M, Tigé F, Grizel H, Rabouin MA. Recherches sur Bonamia ostreae gen. n., sp. n., parasite nouveau d l'huître plate Ostrea edulis L. Rev Trav Inst Pêches Marit. 1980; 43: 131– 140. French.
  104. [128]Naylor R, Hindar K, Fleming IA, Goldburg R, Williams S, Volpe J, et al Fugitive salmon: assessing risks of escaped fish from aquaculture. BioScience. 2005; 55: 427– 437. 10.1641/0006-3568(2005)055[0427:FSATRO]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  105. [130]Jackson D, Drumm A, McEvoy S, Jensen O, Mendiola D, Gabina G, et al A pan-European valuation of the extent, causes and cost of escape events from sea cage fish farming. Aquaculture. 2015; 436: 21– 26. 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2014.10.040 · DOI
  106. [132]Weigle SM, Smith LD, Carlton JT, Pederson J. Assessing the risk of introducing exotic species via the live marine species trade. Conserv Biol. 2005; 19: 213– 223. 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00412.x · DOI
  107. [133]Carlton JR, Mann R. 1996. Transfers and world-wide introductions In: Kennedy VS, Newell RIE, Eble AF, editors. The eastern oyster: Crassostrea virginica. College Park: University of Maryland Sea Grant Press; 1996 pp. 691– 706.
  108. [137]Carlton JT. 1979. Introduced invertebrates of San Francisco Bay. In: Conomos TJ, Leviton AE, Berson M, editors. San Francisco Bay: The urbanized estuary. Investigations into the natural history of San Francisco Bay and Delta with reference to the influence of man. Proceedings of the 58th annual meeting of the Pacific division of American association for the advancement of science; 1977 Jun 12–16; San Francisco, USA. Lawrence: Allen Press; 1979. pp. 427–444.
  109. [139]Miller AW, Ruiz GM, Minton MS, Ambrose RF. Differentiating successful from failed molluscan invaders in estuarine ecosystems. Mar Ecol Progr Ser. 2007; 332: 41– 51. doi: 3354/meps332041
  110. [140]Fowler AE, Blakeslee AMH, Canning-Clode J, Repetto MF, Phillip AM, Carlton JT, et al Opening Pandora’s bait box: a potent vector for biological invasions of live marine species. Divers Distrib. 2015; 22: 30– 42. 10.1111/ddi.12376 · DOI
  111. [141]Font T, Gil J, Lloret J. The commercialization and use of exotic baits in recreational fisheries in the north‐western Mediterranean: Environmental and management implications. Aquatic Conserv. 2018; 28(3): 651– 661. 10.1002/aqc.2873 · DOI
  112. [143]Stebbing P, Johnson P, Delahunty A, Clark PF, McCollin T, Hale C, et al Reports of American lobsters, Homarus americanus (H. Milne Edwards, 1837), in British waters. BioInvasions Rec. 2012; 1(1): 17– 23. 10.3391/bir.2012.1.1.04 · DOI
  113. [146]Cecere E, Petrocelli A, Belmonte M, Portacci G, Rubino F. Activities and vectors responsible for the biological pollution in the Taranto Seas (Mediterranean Sea, southern Italy): a review. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2016; 23(13): 12797– 810. 10.1007/s11356-015-5056-8 26178840 · DOI
  114. [147]Blakeslee A, Fowler A, Couture J, Grosholz E, Ruiz G, Miller A. Effective approaches for reducing diversity of marine organisms transferred with live bait. Manag Biol Invasion. 2016; 7: 389– 398. 10.3391/mbi.2016.7.4.08 · DOI
  115. [149]Wolff T. The horseshoe crab (Limulus polyphemus) in north European waters. Vidensk Meddr Dansk Naturh Foren. 1977; 140: 39– 52.
  116. [150]Meinesz A. Killer algae 1st ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1999.
  117. [151]Jousson O, Pawlowski J, Zaninetti I, Zechman FW, Dini F, Di Giuseppe G, et al Invasive alga reaches California. Nature. 2000; 408: 157– 158. 10.1038/35041623 11089959 · DOI
  118. [152]Piazzi L, Ceccherelli G, Cinelli F. Expansion de Caulerpa taxifolia et de Caulerpa racemosa le long des côtes Toscanes (Italie), situation en 1998. In: Gravez V, Ruitton S, Boudouresque CF, Le Direach L, Meinesz A, Scabbia G, Verlaque M, editors. Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on Caulerpa taxifolia, 1999 Feb 1–2; Lerici, Italy. Marseille: GIS Posidonie Publisher; 2001. pp. 71–77. French.
  119. [153]Anderson LWJ. California’s reaction to Caulerpa taxifolia: a model for invasive species rapid response. Biol Invasions. 2005; 7: 1003– 1016. 10.1007/s10530-004-3123-z · DOI
  120. [154]Komatsu T, Ishikawa T, Yamaguchi N, Hori Y, Ohba H. But next time?: Unsuccessful establishment of the Mediterranean strain of the green seaweed Caulerpa taxifolia in the Sea of Japan. Biol Invasions. 2003; 5: 275– 278. 10.1023/A:1026164902868 · DOI
  121. [155]Fujikura K, Lindsay D, Kitazato H, Nishida S, Shirayama. 2010. Marine biodiversity in Japanese waters. PLoS ONE. 2010; 5(8): e11836 10.1371/journal.pone.0011836 20689840 PMC2914005 · DOI
  122. [157]Semmens BX, Buhle ER, Salomon AK, Pattengill-Semmens CV. A hotspot of non-native marine fishes: evidence for the aquarium trade as an invasion pathway. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2004; 266: 239– 244. 10.3354/meps266239 · DOI · Paper page
  123. [159]Carballo-Cárdenas E. Controversies and consensus on the lionfish invasion in the western Atlantic Ocean. Ecol Society. 2015; 20: 24 10.5751/ES-07726-200324 · DOI
  124. [160]Lloyd WA. On the occurrence of Limulus polyphemus off the coast of Holland, and on the transmission of aquarium animals. Zoologist. 1874; 9(2): 3845– 3855.
  125. [162]Johnston MW, Purkis SJ. Correction: modeling the potential spread of the recently identified non-native Panther grouper (Chromileptes altivelis) in the Atlantic using a cellular automaton approach. PLoS ONE. 2013; 8(9): 10.1371/annotation/54b58291-1a3f-4a38-b48a-fe4466b7f61b PMC3756970 24009726 · DOI
  126. [163]Ng TH, Tan HH. The introduction, origin and life-history attributes of the non-native cichlid Etroplus suratensis in the coastal waters of Singapore. J Fish Biol. 2010; 76(9): 2238– 2260. 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2010.02642.x 20557661 · DOI
  127. [164]Zammit E, Schembri P. An overlooked and unexpected introduction? Occurrence of the spotted scat Scatophagus argus (Linnaeus, 1766) (Osteichthyes: Scatophagidae) in the Maltese Islands. Aquat Invasions. 2011; 6(Suppl 1): S79– S83. 10.3391/ai2011.6.S1.018 · DOI
  128. [165]Langeneck J, MarcellI M, Simak HC. Unexpected alien species in Cyprus waters: Acanthurus coeruleus (Actinopterygii: Acanthuridae). Mar Biodivers Rec. 2012; 5: e116 10.1017/S1755267212001042 · DOI
  129. [166]Guidetti P, Magnali L, Navone A. First record of the acanthurid fish Zebrasoma xanthurum (Blyth, 1852) in the Mediterranean Sea, with some considerations on the risk associated with aquarium trade. Mediterr Mar Sci. 2016; 17(1): 147– 151. 10.12681/mms.1470 · DOI
  130. [169]Randall JE. New records of fishes from the Hawaiian Islands. Pac Sci. 1980; 34(3): 211– 232.
  131. [170]Lelong P. Capture d’un macabit, Epinephelus merra Bloch, 1793 (Poisson, Serranidae), en Méditerranée nord-occidentale. Mar Life. 2005; 15(1–2): 63– 66. French. Available from: http://www.marinelife-revue.fr/IMG/pdf/Lelong-2005-MarLife.pdf.
  132. [171]Rhyne AL, Tlusty MF, Schofield PJ, Kaufman L, Morris JA Jr. Revealing the appetite of the marine aquarium fish trade: the volume and biodiversity of fish imported into the United States. PLoS ONE. 2012; 7(5): e35808 10.1371/journal.pone.0035808 22629303 PMC3357433 · DOI
  133. [172]Biondo MV. Quantifying the trade in marine ornamental fishes into Switzerland and an estimation of imports from the European Union. Glob Ecol Conserv. 2017; 11: 95– 105. 10.1016/j.gecco.2017.05.006 · DOI
  134. [174]Herodotus. The Histories Translated by Waterfield R. Oxford world’s classics. Unknown edition Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008.
  135. [176]Olenin S. Black Sea–Baltic Sea invasion corridors. In: Briand F, editor. Alien marine organisms introduced by ships in the Mediterranean and Black Seas. CIESM Workshops Monograph 20. Comission Internationale pour l’Exploration Scientifique de la mer Mediterranee; 2002. pp. 29–33.
  136. [177]Gollasch S, Galil BS, Cohen AN. Bridging divides: Maritime canals as invasion corridors Monographiae Biologicae 83 Dordrecht: Springer; 2006.
  137. [178]Vaillant L. Recherches sur la faune malacologique de la baie de Suez. J Conchyliol. 1865; 13: 97– 127. French.
  138. [179]Monterosato TA. Enumerazione e sinonimia delle conchiglie mediterranee. G Sci Nat Econ Palermo. 1878; 13: 61– 115. Italian.
  139. [180]Fox HM. General part. Zoological results of the Cambridge expedition to the Suez Canal, 1924. 1. Trans Zool Soc London. 1926; 22: 1– 64.
  140. [181]Galil BS. The marine caravan–The Suez Canal and the Erythrean invasion In: Gollasch S, Galil BS, Cohen AN, editors. Bridging Divides. Dordrecht: Springer; 2006 pp. 207– 300.
  141. [183]Galil BS, Marchini A, Occhipinti-Ambrogi A. East is east and west is west? Management of marine bioinvasions in the Mediterranean Sea. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci. 2018; 201: 7– 16. 10.1016/j.ecss.2015.12.021 · DOI · Paper page
  142. [184]Hildebrand SF. The tarpon in the Panama Canal. Sci Mon. 1937; 44: 239– 248.
  143. [185]Hildebrand SF. The Panama Canal as a passageway for fishes, with lists and remarks on the fishes and invertebrates observed. Zoologica (N.Y.). 1939; 24(3): 15– 45. Available from: http://www.bio-nica.info/biblioteca/Hildebrand1939PanamaCanal.pdf.
  144. [187]Cohen AN. Species introduction in the Panama Canal In: Gollasch S, Galil BS, Cohen AN, editors. Bridging Divides. Dordrecht: Springer; 2006 pp. 127– 206.
  145. [188]Rubinoff RW, Rubinoff I. Interoceanic colonization of a marine goby through the Panama Canal. Nature. 1968; 217: 476– 478. 10.1038/217476a0 · DOI
  146. [189]Por FD. One hundred years of Suez canal–a century of Lessepsian migration: retrospect and viewpoints. Syst Zool. 1971; 20(2): 138– 159. 10.2307/2412054 · DOI
  147. [190]Hewitt CL. distribution and diversity of tropical Australian marine bio-invasions. Pac Sci. 2002; 56: 213– 222. 10.1353/psc.2002.0016 · DOI
  148. [191]Ruiz GM, Torchin ME, Grant K. Using the Panama Canal to test predictions about tropical marine invasions In: Lang MA, Macintyre IG, Rutzler K, editors. Proceedings of the Smithsonian Marine Science Symposium. Smith Contributions to the Marine Sciences, vol 38 Washington D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Scholarly Press; 2009 pp. 291– 299.
  149. [193]Ruiz GM, Carlton JT. Invasion vectors: a conceptual framework for management In: Ruiz GM, Carlton JT, editors. Invasive species: Vectors and management strategies. Washington: Island Press; 2003 pp. 459– 504.
  150. [194]Lehtiniemi M, Ojaveer H, David M, Galil BS, Gollasch S, McKenzie S, et al Dose of truth—Monitoring marine non-indigenous species to serve legislative requirements. Mar Policy. 2015; 54: 26– 35. 10.1016/j.marpol.2014.12.015 · DOI
  151. [195]Ruiz GM, Hewitt CL. Toward understanding patters of coastal marine invasions: A prospectus In: Leppäkoski E, Olenin S, Gollasch S, editors. Invasive aquatic species of Europe. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002 pp. 529– 547.
  152. [196]Campbell ML, Gould B, Hewitt CL. Survey evaluations to assess marine bioinvasions. Mar Pollut Bull. 2007; 55: 360– 378. 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2007.01.015 17391713 · DOI
  153. [197]Ruiz GM, Freestone AL, Fofonoff PW, Simkanin C. Habitat distribution and heterogeneity in marine invasion dynamics: The importance of hard substrate and artificial structure In: Wahl M, editor. Marine hard bottom communities. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2009 pp. 321– 332.
  154. [198]Page HM, Dugan JE, Culver CS, Hoesterey JC. Exotic invertebrate species on offshore oil platforms. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2006; 325: 101– 107. 10.3354/meps325101 · DOI
  155. [199]Bulleri F, Chapman MG. The introduction of coastal infrastructure as a driver of change in marine environments. J Appl Ecol. 2010; 47: 26– 35. 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01751.x · DOI
  156. [200]Carman MR, Bullard SG, Rocha RM, Lambert G, Dijkstra JA, Roper JJ, et al Ascidians at the Pacific and Atlantic entrances to the Panama Canal. Aquat Invasions. 2011; 6: 371– 380. 10.3391/ai.2011.6.4.02 · DOI
  157. [201]Adams TP, Miller RG, Alleyne D, Burrows MT. Offshore marine renewable energy devices as stepping stones across biogeographical boundaries. J Appl Ecol. 2014; 51: 330– 338. 10.1111/1365-2664.12207 · DOI
  158. [203]Pederson J, Bullock R, Carlton J, Dijkstra J, Dobroski N, Dyrynda P, et al 2005 Rapid assessment survey of non-native and native marine species of floating dock communities, August 2003 Cambridge: MIT Sea Grant College Program; 2005.
  159. [204]Arenas F, Bishop JDD, Carlton JT, Dyrynda PJ, Farnham WF, Gonzalez DJ, et al Alien species and other notable records from a rapid assessment survey of marinas on the south coast of England. J Mar Biol Assoc UK. 2006; 86(6): 1329– 1337. 10.1017/S0025315406014354 · DOI
  160. [205]Ashton GV, Boos K, Shucksmith R, Cook EJ. Risk assessment of hull fouling as a vector for marine non-natives in Scotland. Aquat Invasions. 2006; 1(4): 214– 218.
  161. [206]Minchin D. Rapid coastal survey for targeted alien species associated with floating pontoons in Ireland. Aquat Invasions. 2007; 2(1): 63– 70. 10.3391/ai2007.2.1.8 · DOI
  162. [210]Gartner HN, Murray CC, Frey MA, Nelson J, Larson K, Ruiz GM, Therriault TW. Nonindigenous invertebrate species in the marine fouling communities of British Columbia, Canada. BioInvasion Records 2016; 5(4): 205– 212. 10.3391/bir.2016.5.4.03 · DOI
  163. [211]Canning-Clode J, Fofonoff P, McCann L, Carlton JT, Ruiz GM. Marine invasions on a subtropical island: fouling studies and new records in a recent marina on Madeira Island (Eastern Atlantic Ocean). Aquatic Invasions 2013; 8(3): 261– 270. 10.3391/ai.2013.8.3.02 · DOI
  164. [212]Wittenberg R, Cock MJW. Best practices for the prevention and management of invasive alien species In: Mooney HA, Mack RN, McNeely JA, Neville LE, Schei PJ, Waage JK, editors. Invasive alien species: A new synthesis. Washington, D.C.: Island Press; 2005 pp. 209– 232.
  165. [214]Hopkins GW, Freckleton RP. Declines in the numbers of amateur and professional taxonomists: implications for conservation. Anim Conserv. 2002; 5: 245– 249. 10.1017/S1367943002002299 · DOI
  166. [215]Kelly RP, Port JA, Yamahara KM, Martone RG, Lowell N, Thomsen PF, et al Harnessing DNA to improve environmental management. Science. 2014; 344(6191): 1455– 1456. 10.1126/science.1251156 24970068 · DOI
  167. [216]Darling JA, Galil BS, Carvalho GR, Rius M, Viard F, Piraino S. Recommendations for developing and applying molecular genetic tools to assess and manage biological invasions in marine ecosystems. Mar Policy. 2017; 85: 54– 64. 10.1016/j.marpol.2017.08.014 29681680 PMC5909192 · DOI
  168. [217]McDonald JH, Koehn RK. The mussels Mytilus galloprovincialis and Mytilus trossulus on the Pacific coast of North America. Mar Biol. 1988; 99: 111– 18. 10.1007/BF00644984 · DOI
  169. [218]McDonald JH, Seed R, Koehn RK. Allozymes and morphometric characters of three species of Mytilus in the northern and southern hemispheres. Mar Biol. 1991; 111: 323– 33. 10.1007/BF01319403 · DOI
  170. [219]Spidle AP, Marsden JE, May B. Identification of the Great Lakes quagga mussel as Dreissena bugensis from the Dnieper River, Ukraine, on the basis of allozyme variation. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 1994; 51: 1485– 1489. 10.1139/f94-148 · DOI
  171. [220]Geller JB, Carlton JT, Powers DA. PCR-based detection of mtDNA haplotypes of native and invading mussels on the northeastern Pacific coast: latitudinal pattern of invasion. Mar Biol. 1994; 119: 243– 49. 10.1007/BF00349563 · DOI
  172. [221]Geller JB, Walton ED, Grosholz ED, Ruiz GM. Cryptic invasions of the crab Carcinus detected by molecular phylogeography. Mol Ecol. 1997; 6: 901– 906. 10.1046/j.1365-294X.1997.00256.x. 9348700 · DOI
  173. [222]Heath DD, Rawson PD, Hilbish TJ. PCR-based nuclear markers identify alien blue mussel (Mytilus spp.) genotypes on the west coast of Canada. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 1995; 52(12): 2621– 2627. 10.1139/f95-851 · DOI
  174. [223]Bastrop R, Jurss K, Sturmbauer C. Cryptic species in a marine polychaete and their independent introduction from North America to Europe. Mol Biol Evol. 1998; 15: 97– 103. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025919 9491608 · DOI
  175. [224]Davies N, Villablanca FX, Roderick GK. Determining the source of individuals: multilocus genotyping in nonequilibrium population genetics. Trends Ecol Evol. 1999; 14: 17– 21. 10.1016/S0169-5347(98)01530-4 10234242 · DOI
  176. [225]Aridgides LJ, Doblin MA, Berke T, Dobbs FC, Matson DO, Drake LA. Multiplex PCR allows simultaneous detection of pathogens in ships' ballast water. Mar Pollut Bull. 2004; 48, 1096– 1101. 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2003.12.017 15172815 · DOI
  177. [226]Patil JG, Gunasekera RM, Deagle BE, Bax NJ, Blackburn SI. Development and evaluation of a PCR based assay for detection of the toxic dinoflagellate, Gymnodinium catenatum (Graham) in ballast water and environmental samples. Biol Invasions. 2005; 7: 983– 994. 10.1007/s10530-004-3119-8 · DOI
  178. [227]Doblin MA, Coyne KJ, Rinta-Kanto JM, Wilhelm SW, Dobbs FC. Dynamics and short-term survival of toxic cyanobacteria species in ballast water from NOBOB vessels transiting the Great Lakes—implications for HAB invasions. Harmful Algae. 2007; 6: 519– 530. 10.1016/j.hal.2006.05.007 · DOI
  179. [228]Smith KF, Wood SA, Mountfort D, Cary SC. Development of a real-time PCR assay for the detection of the invasive clam, Corbula amurensis, in environmental samples. J Exp Mar Bio Ecol. 2012; 412: 52– 57. 10.1016/j.jembe.2011.10.021 · DOI
  180. [229]Gillum JE, Jimenez L, White DJ, Goldstien SJ, Gemmell NJ. Development and application of a quantitative real-time PCR assay for the globally invasive tunicate Styela clava. Manag Biol Invasion. 2014; 5: 133– 142. 10.3391/mbi.2014.5.2.06 · DOI
  181. [230]Ardura A, Zaiko A, Martinez JL, Samuiloviene A, Semenova A, Garcia-Vazquez E. eDNA and specific primers for early detection of invasive species- a case study on the bivalve Rangia cuneata, currently spreading in Europe. Mar Environ Res. 2015; 112(B): 48– 55. 10.1016/j.marenvres.2015.09.013 26453004 · DOI
  182. [231]Wood SA, Zaiko A, Richter I, Inglis G, Pochon X. Development of a real-time polymerase chain reaction assay for the detection of the invasive Mediterranean fanworm, Sabella spallanzanii, in environmental samples. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2017; 24(21): 17373– 17382. 10.1007/s11356-017-9357-y 28589279 · DOI
  183. [232]Hebert P.D.N., Cywinska A., Ball S.L., de Waard J.R. Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2003; 270: 313– 321. 10.1098/rspb.2002.2218 12614582 PMC1691236 · DOI · Paper page
  184. [233]Taberlet P, Coissac E, Pompanon F, Brochmann C, Willerslev E. next-generation biodiversity assessment using DNA metabarcoding. Mol Ecol. 2012; 21(8): 2045– 50. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05470.x 22486824 · DOI · Paper page
  185. [234]Ansorge WJ. Next-generation DNA sequencing techniques. N Biotechnol. 2009; 25(4): 195– 203. 10.1016/j.nbt.2008.12.009 19429539 · DOI · Paper page
  186. [235]Hajibabaei M, Shokralla S, Zhou X, Singer GA, Baird DJ. Environmental barcoding: a next-generation sequencing approach for biomonitoring applications using river benthos. PloS ONE. 2011; 6(4): e17497 10.1371/journal.pone.0017497 21533287 PMC3076369 · DOI · Paper page
  187. [236]Pochon X, Bott NJ, Smith KF, Wood SA. Evaluating detection limits of next-generation sequencing for the surveillance and monitoring of international marine pests. PloS ONE. 2013; 8(9): e73935 10.1371/journal.pone.0073935 24023913 PMC3762713 · DOI
  188. [237]Ji Y, Ashton L, Pedley SM, Edwards DP, Tang Y, Nakamura A, et al Reliable, verifiable and efficient monitoring of biodiversity via metabarcoding. Ecol Lett. 2013; 16(10): 1245– 1257. 10.1111/ele.12162 23910579 · DOI · Paper page
  189. [238]Wood SA, Smith KF, Banks JC, Tremblay LA, Rhodes L, Mountfort D, et al Molecular genetic tools for environmental monitoring of New Zealand's aquatic habitats, past, present and the future. N Z J Mar Freshwater Res. 2013; 47: 90– 119. 10.1080/00288330.2012.745885 · DOI
  190. [239]Collins RA, Armstrong KF, Holyoake AJ, Keeling S. Something in the water: biosecurity monitoring of ornamental fish imports using environmental DNA. Biol Invasions. 2013; 15: 1209– 1215. 10.1007/s10530-012-0376-9 · DOI
  191. [240]Comtet T, Sandionigi A, Viard F, Casiraghi M. DNA (meta)barcoding of biological invasions: a powerful tool to elucidate invasion processes and help managing aliens. Biol Invasions. 2015; 17: 905– 922. 10.1007/s10530-015-0854-y · DOI
  192. [241]Pochon X, Zaiko A, Hopkins GA, Banks JC, Wood SA. Early detection of eukaryotic communities from marine biofilm using high-throughput sequencing: an assessment of different sampling devices. Biofouling. 2015; 31(3): 241– 251. 10.1080/08927014.2015.1028923 25877857 · DOI
  193. [242]Zaiko A, Martinez JL, Schmidt-Petersen J, Ribicic D, Samuloviene A, Garcia-Vazquez E. Metabarcoding approach for the ballast water surveillance—an advantageous solution or an awkward challenge? Mar Pollut Bull. 2015; 92: 25– 34. 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2015.01.008 25627196 · DOI
  194. [243]Zaiko A, Samulioviene A, Ardura A, Garcia-Vazquez E. Metabarcoding approach for non-indigenous species surveillance in marine coastal waters. Mar Pollut Bull. 2015; 100: 53– 59. 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2015.09.030 26422121 · DOI
  195. [244]Zaiko A, Schimanski K, Pochon X, Hopkins GA, Goldstien S, Floerl O, et al Metabarcoding improves detection of eukaryotes from early biofouling communities: implications for pest monitoring and pathway management. Biofouling 2016; 32(6): 671– 684. 10.1080/08927014.2016.1186165 27212415 · DOI
  196. [245]Bott NJ, Ophel-Keller KM, Sierp MT, Rowling KP, McKay AC, Loo MG, et al Toward routine, DNA-based detection methods for marine pests. Biotechnol Adv. 2010; 28(6): 706– 714. 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2010.05.018 20488239 · DOI
  197. [246]Mountfort D, Smith KF, Kirs M, Kuhajek JM, Adamson JE, Wood SA. Development of single and multispecies detection methods for the surveillance and monitoring of marine pests in New Zealand. Aquat Invasions. 2012; 7(1): 125– 128. 10.3391/ai.2012.7.1.013 · DOI
  198. [247]Viard F, David P, Darling J. Marine invasions enter the genomic era: Three lessons from the past, and the way forward. Curr Zool. 2016; 62: 629– 642. 10.1093/cz/zow053 29491950 PMC5804250 · DOI
  199. [248]Zhou X, Li Y, Liu S, Yang Q, Su X, Zhou L, et al Ultra-deep sequencing enables high-fidelity recovery of biodiversity for bulk arthropod samples without PCR amplification. GigaScience. 2013; 2: 4 10.1186/2047-217X-2-4 23587339 PMC3637469 · DOI
  200. [249]Bohmann K, Evans A, Gilbert MTP, Carvalho GR, Creer S, Knapp M, et al Environmental DNA for wildlife biology and biodiversity monitoring. Trends Ecol Evol. 2014; 29(6): 358– 367. 10.1016/j.tree.2014.04.003 24821515 · DOI

200 of 338 shown

Authors
Ojaveer, H., Galil, B. S., Carlton, J. T., Alleway, H., Goulletquer, P., Lehtiniemi, M., Marchini, A., Miller, W., Occhipinti-Ambrogi, A., Peharda, M., Ruiz, G. M., Williams, S. L., & Zaiko, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Tartu (EE)
  • Tel Aviv University (IL)
  • Williams College (US)
  • The University of Adelaide (AU)
  • Ifremer (FR)
  • Finnish Environment Institute (FI)
  • University of Pavia (IT)
  • Smithsonian Environmental Research Center (US)
  • Institute of Oceanography and Fisheries (HR)
  • University of California, Davis (US)
  • Klaipėda University (LT)
Corresponding author
Ojaveer, Henn
ORCID
Venue
PLOS ONE
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Published
2018-08-16
Volume
13
Issue
8
Pages
e0202383
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0202383
PMC
PMC6095587
OpenAlex
W2885644717
Cited by
184
References
338
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 2
FWCI
10.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • Institutional Archive of Ifremer (French Research Institute for Exploitation of the Sea) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
International Council for the Exploration of the Sea
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine Ecology and Invasive Species
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Coastal and Marine Management
Keywords
marine invasions, introduced species, historical baselines, human-mediated introduction, transfer mechanisms, invasive species impacts, ecosystem-based management
MeSH terms
Animals, Conservation of Natural Resources, Environmental Monitoring, Fisheries, Humans, Marine Biology, Oceans and Seas, Public Health, Ships, History, 16th Century, History, 17th Century, History, 18th Century, History, 19th Century, History, 20th Century, History, 21st Century, Introduced Species

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review