The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A deep learning model for the detection of both advanced and early glaucoma using fundus photography
Open accessAbstract
PURPOSE: To build a deep learning model to diagnose glaucoma using fundus photography. DESIGN: Cross sectional case study Subjects, Participants and Controls: A total of 1,542 photos (786 normal controls, 467 advanced glaucoma and 289 early glaucoma patients) were obtained by fundus photography. METHOD: The whole dataset of 1,542 images were split into 754 training, 324 validation and 464 test datasets. These datasets were used to construct simple logistic classification and convolutional neural network using Tensorflow. The same datasets were used to fine tune pre-trained GoogleNet Inception v3 model. RESULTS: The simple logistic classification model showed a training accuracy of 82.9%, validation accuracy of 79.9% and test accuracy of 77.2%. Convolutional neural network achieved accuracy and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 92.2% and 0.98 on the training data, 88.6% and 0.95 on the validation data, and 87.9% and 0.94 on the test data. Transfer-learned GoogleNet Inception v3 model achieved accuracy and AUROC of 99.7% and 0.99 on training data, 87.7% and 0.95 on validation data, and 84.5% and 0.93 on test data. CONCLUSION: Both advanced and early glaucoma could be correctly detected via machine learning, using only fundus photographs. Our new model that is trained using convolutional neural network is more efficient for the diagnosis of early glaucoma than previously published models.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155
Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Vision
Szegedy, C., Vanhoucke, V., Ioffe, S., Shlens, J., & Wojna, Z. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.308 · Cited by 32,138
Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks
Esteva, A., Kuprel, B., Novoa, R. A., Ko, J., Swetter, S. M., Blau, H. M., & Thrun, S. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature21056 · Cited by 14,362
TensorFlow: Large-Scale Machine Learning on Heterogeneous Distributed Systems
Abadi, M., Agarwal, A., Barham, P., Brevdo, E., Chen, Z., Citro, C., Corrado, G. S., Davis, A., Dean, J., Devin, M., et al. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1603.04467 · Cited by 9,408
Deep residual learning for image steganalysis
Wu, S., Zhong, S., & Liu, Y. (2018) · Multimedia Tools and Applications · doi:10.1007/s11042-017-4440-4 · Cited by 442
Uddin, M., Tammimies, K., Pellecchia, G., Alipanahi, B., Hu, P., Wang, Z., Pinto, D., Lau, L., Nalpathamkalam, T., Marshall, C. R., et al. (2014) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.2980 · Cited by 163
Gaussian processes for personalized e-health monitoring with wearable sensors
Clifton, L., Clifton, D. A., Pimentel, M. A. F., Watkinson, P. J., & Tarassenko, L. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2012.2208459 · Cited by 117
Cited by
Narin, A., Kaya, C., & Pamuk, Z. (2021) · Pattern Analysis and Applications · doi:10.1007/s10044-021-00984-y · Cited by 2,054
A foundation model for generalizable disease detection from retinal images
Zhou, Y., Chia, M. A., Wagner, S. K., Ayhan, M. S., Williamson, D. J., Struyven, R. R., Liu, T., Xu, M., Lozano, M. G., Woodward-Court, P., et al. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06555-x · Cited by 1,014
Transfer learning for medical image classification: a literature review
Kim, H. E., Cosa-Linan, A., Santhanam, N., Jannesari, M., Maros, M. E., & Ganslandt, T. (2022) · BMC Medical Imaging · doi:10.1186/s12880-022-00793-7 · Cited by 965
The ImageJ ecosystem: Open‐source software for image visualization, processing, and analysis
Schroeder, A. B., Dobson, E. T. A., Rueden, C. T., Tomancak, P., Jug, F., & Eliceiri, K. W. (2021) · Protein Science · doi:10.1002/pro.3993 · Cited by 391
Deep learning in medical image analysis: A third eye for doctors
Fourcade, A., & Khonsari, R. H. (2019) · Journal of Stomatology, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.jormas.2019.06.002 · Cited by 284
Metadata
- Authors
- Ahn, J. M., Kim, S., Ahn, K.-S., Cho, S.-H., Lee, K. B., & Kim, U. S.
- Venue
- PLOS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2018-11-27
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- e0207982
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2903117925
- Cited by
- 246
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 13.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A deep learning model for the detection of both advanced and early glaucoma using fundus photography. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pone.0207982
- The paper
- Ahn, J. M., Kim, S., Ahn, K.-S., Cho, S.-H., Lee, K. B., & Kim, U. S. (2018). A deep learning model for the detection of both advanced and early glaucoma using fundus photography. PLOS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207982
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
