Cited by 60Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchMental Health Treatment and AccessAging and Gerontology Research

Factors associated with public knowledge of and attitudes to dementia: A cross-sectional study

Open access
Rosato, Michael, Leavey, Gerard, Cooper, Janine, De Cock, Paul, Devine, Paula·2019·PLOS ONE

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Dementia is a major public health concern but one that continues to be stigmatised. We examine lay knowledge of dementia and attitudes to people with dementia as potential precursors of public anxiety, focusing on the social characteristics associated with (a) the formation of these attitudes, and (b) the perception of the need for restriction and control for people with dementia. METHODS: Analysis of the 2014 Northern Ireland Life and Times survey, which included questions on knowledge of, attitudes to and personal experience with dementia. We used (a) latent class analysis and (b) logistic regression to examine factors associated with respondent attitudes towards dementia. RESULTS: Respondents (n = 1211) had relatively good general knowledge of dementia, but limited knowledge of specific risk factors. Negative perceptions of dementia were mitigated somewhat by personal contact. A high proportion of respondents felt that high levels of control were appropriate for people diagnosed with dementia, even at early stages of the disease. CONCLUSION: Personal antipathy to dementia was highly prevalent despite ongoing public campaigns to increase public awareness of developments in its prevention, treatment and consequent care pathways and hampering efforts to widen social inclusion. Fresh thinking and more resources may be needed to challenge persisting common misapprehension of the condition and the formation of entrenched stigma.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0210543

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Rosato et al. found that only 44% of participants could answer questions about dementia risk factors correctly.

    “Rosato et al., put forth that only 44% of the participants could answer the questions about risk factors correctly.”

    From Dementia Knowledge in Older and Young Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study (2024) · cites this paper as [35]

    The Results (Contact and care-giving; Table 2, page unavailable) do not report that 44% answered the risk-factor questions correctly. They report that 56.4% answered four or more of the five incorrectly, while only 11.2% answered four or more correctly; 44% is approximately the complement of the former figure, not a measure of correct answers. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Being informed about dementia and personal contact with affected individuals does not always result in positive reactions.

    “However, being informed about dementia and personal contact with affected individuals does not always result in positive reactions.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 31 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [13]Rasmussen J (2014). Chapter 3: The impact of stigma for decision making, diagnosis, treatment and care of the individual, in Bamford et al “New perspectives and approaches to understanding dementia and stigma: a compendium of essays” ILC-UK
  2. [16]Goffman E (1963). Stigma and social identity. Stigma: notes on the management of spoiled identity Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice Hall: 1– 40
  3. [17]Scambler G (1998). Stigma and disease. The Lancet 352(9133): 1054– 1055 9759769

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rosato, M., Leavey, G., Cooper, J., De Cock, P., & Devine, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Ulster (GB)
  • Queen's University Belfast (GB)
Corresponding author
Rosato, Michael
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2019-02-28
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
e0210543
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2918767663
Cited by
60
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1
FWCI
7.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Ulster University Research Portal (Ulster University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Public Health Agency (COM/4662/12, COM/5017/14)
  • Economic and Social Research Council (ES/S00744X/1, ES/L007509/1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
Keywords
dementia, dementia stigma, dementia risk factors, social inclusion, public awareness campaigns
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Cross-Sectional Studies, Dementia, Female, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Middle Aged, Northern Ireland, Risk Factors, Stereotyping, Young Adult, Social Stigma

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review