Cited by 22Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationAutomotive and Human Injury BiomechanicsPregnancy-related medical research

A cluster randomised, double-blind pilot and feasibility trial of an active behavioural physiotherapy intervention for acute whiplash-associated disorder (WAD)II

Open access
Wiangkham, Taweewat, Duda, Joan, Haque, M. Sayeed, Price, Jonathan, Rushton, Alison·2019·PLOS ONE

Abstract

Whiplash-associated disorder (WAD) causes substantial social and economic burden, with ≥70% patients classified as WADII (neck complaint and musculoskeletal sign(s)). Effective management in the acute stage is required to prevent development of chronicity; an issue for 60% of patients. An Active Behavioural Physiotherapy Intervention (ABPI) was developed to address both physical and psychological components of WAD. The ABPI is a novel complex intervention designed through a rigorous sequential multiphase project to prevent transition of acute WAD to chronicity. An external pilot and feasibility cluster randomised double-blind (assessor, participants) parallel two-arm clinical trial was conducted in the UK private sector. The trial compared ABPI versus standard physiotherapy to evaluate trial procedures and feasibility of the ABPI for managing acute WADII in preparation for a future definitive trial. Six private physiotherapy clinics were recruited and cluster randomised using a computer-generated randomisation sequence. Twenty-eight (20 ABPI, 8 standard physiotherapy) participants [median age 38.00 (IQR = 21.50) years] were recruited. Data were analysed descriptively with a priori establishment of success criteria. Ninety-five percent of participants in the ABPI arm fully recovered (Neck Disability Index ≤4, compared to 17% in the standard physiotherapy arm); required fewer treatment sessions; and demonstrated greater improvement in all outcome measures (pain intensity, Cervical Range of Motion, Pressure Pain Threshold, EuroQol-5 Dimensions) except for the Impact of Events Scale and Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire. The findings support the potential value of the ABPI, and that an adequately powered definitive trial to evaluate effectiveness (clinical, cost) is feasible with minor modifications to procedures.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0215803

Cites

89 of 89 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. [5]Jennum P, Kjellberg J, Ibsen R, Bendix T. Health, social, and economic consequences of neck injuries: a controlled national study evaluating societal effects on patients and their partners. Spine. 2013; 38(5): 449– 57. Epub 2012/12/15. 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182819203. 23238487 · DOI
  2. [6]Buitenhuis J, de Jong PJ, Jaspers JP, Groothoff JW. Work disability after whiplash: a prospective cohort study. Spine. 2009; 34(3): 262– 7. Epub 2009/01/17. 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181913d07. 19148041 · DOI
  3. [9]Holm LW, Carroll LJ, Cassidy JD, Hogg-Johnson S, Cote P, Guzman J, et al The burden and determinants of neck pain in whiplash-associated disorders after traffic collisions: results of the Bone and Joint Decade 2000–2010 Task Force on Neck Pain and Its Associated Disorders. Spine. 2008; 33(4 Suppl): S52– 9. Epub 2008/02/07. 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181643ece. 18204401 · DOI
  4. [12]Financial Services Commission of Ontario. Financial services submission to the superintendent: submitted for the review of part VI of the insurance act. Canada: Financial Services Commission of Ontario; 2014.
  5. [20]Sterling M, Vicenzino B, Souvlis T, Connelly LB. Dry-needling and exercise for chronic whiplash-associated disorders: a randomized single-blind placebo-controlled trial. Pain. 2015; 156(4): 635– 43. 25790454
  6. [22]Wiangkham T, Duda J, Haque MS, Madi M, Rushton A. Effectiveness of conservative treatment in acute Whiplash Associated Disorder (WAD) II: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Physiotherapy. 2015; 101, Supplement 1(0): e1623– e4. 10.1016/j.physio.2015.03.1642. PMC4511004 26196127 · DOI
  7. [50]Rosenfeld M, Gunnarsson R, Borenstein P. Early intervention in whiplash-associated disorders: A comparison of two treatment protocols. Spine. 2000; 25(14): 1782– 7. 10888946
  8. [51]Rosenfeld M, Seferiadis A, Carlsson J, Gunnarsson R. Active intervention in patients with whiplash-associated disorders improves long-term prognosis: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Spine. 2003; 28(22): 2491– 8. Epub 2003/11/19. 10.1097/01.BRS.0000090822.96814.13. 14624083 · DOI
  9. [69]Kasch H, Bach FW, Jensen TS. Handicap after acute whiplash injury: a 1-year prospective study of risk factors. Neurology. 2001; 56(12): 1637– 43. Epub 2001/06/27.. 11425927
  10. [71]Malmstrom EM, Karlberg M, Melander A, Magnusson M. Zebris versus Myrin: a comparative study between a three-dimensional ultrasound movement analysis and an inclinometer/compass method: intradevice reliability, concurrent validity, intertester comparison, intratester reliability, and intraindividual variability. Spine. 2003; 28(21): E433– 40. Epub 2003/11/05. 10.1097/01.BRS.0000090840.45802.D4. 14595170 · DOI
  11. [79]Carroll LJ, Hurwitz EL, Cote P, Hogg-Johnson S, Carragee EJ, Nordin M, et al Research priorities and methodological implications: the Bone and Joint Decade 2000–2010 Task Force on Neck Pain and Its Associated Disorders. Spine. 2008; 33(4 Suppl): S214– 20. Epub 2008/02/07. 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318164462c. 18204394 · DOI
  12. [103]Donner A, Birkett N, Buck C. Randomization by cluster. Sample size requirements and analysis. Am J Epidemiol. 1981; 114(6): 906– 14. Epub 1981/12/01.. 7315838

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wiangkham, T., Duda, J., Haque, M. S., Price, J., & Rushton, A.
Affiliations
  • Naresuan University (TH)
  • University of Birmingham (GB)
  • Birmingham Community Healthcare NHS Trust (GB)
Corresponding author
Rushton, Alison
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2019-05-09
Volume
14
Issue
5
Pages
e0215803
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2944217298
Cited by
22
References
89
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1
FWCI
2.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
National Institute for Health and Care Research (ICA-PCAF-2018-01-117)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Pregnancy-related medical research
Keywords
whiplash-associated disorders, acute whiplash, complex interventions, chronicity prevention, neck pain, physiotherapy, feasibility, Neck Disability Index, cervical range of motion, pressure pain threshold, fear-avoidance beliefs, psychological factors
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Behavior Therapy, Double-Blind Method, Feasibility Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Whiplash Injuries, Treatment Outcome, Physical Therapy Modalities, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review