The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The impacts of medication shortages on patient outcomes: A scoping review
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: In recent years, medication shortages have become a growing worldwide issue. This scoping review aimed to systematically synthesise the literature to report on the economic, clinical, and humanistic impacts of medication shortages on patient outcomes. METHODS: Medline, Embase, Global Health, PsycINFO and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts were searched using the two key concepts of medicine shortage and patient outcomes. Articles were limited to the English language, human studies and there were no limits to the year of publication. Manuscripts included contained information regarding the shortage of a scheduled medication and had gathered data regarding the economic, clinical, and/or humanistic outcomes of drug shortages on human patients. FINDINGS: We found that drug shortages were predominantly reported to have adverse economic, clinical and humanistic outcomes to patients. Patients were more commonly reported to have increased out of pocket costs, rates of drug errors, adverse events, mortality, and complaints during times of shortage. There were also reports of equivalent and improved patient outcomes in some cases. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this review provide valuable insights into the impact drug shortages have on patient outcomes. The majority of studies reported medication shortages resulted in negative patient clinical, economic and humanistic outcomes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Medicine shortages in Fiji: A qualitative exploration of stakeholders’ views
Walker, J., Chaar, B. B., Vera, N., Pillai, A. S., Lim, J. S., Bero, L., & Moles, R. J. (2017) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0178429 · Cited by 57
Self-citationHypertension management in rural primary care facilities in Zambia: a mixed methods study
Yan, L. D., Chirwa, C., Chi, B. H., Bosomprah, S., Sindano, N., Mwanza, M., Musatwe, D., Mulenga, M., & Chilengi, R. (2017) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-017-2063-0 · Cited by 46
Cited by
Challenges of e-Learning during the COVID-19 Pandemic Experienced by EFL Learners
Mahyoob, M. (2020) · Arab World English Journal · doi:10.24093/awej/vol11no4.23 · Cited by 438
Drug Shortage: Causes, Impact, and Mitigation Strategies
Shukar, S., Zahoor, F., Hayat, K., Saeed, A., Gillani, A. H., Omer, S., Hu, S., Babar, Z.-U.-D., Fang, Y., & Yang, C. (2021) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2021.693426 · Cited by 322
Cherfane, M., Boueri, M., Issa, E., Abdallah, R., Hamam, A., Sbeity, K., Saad, A., & Abi-Gerges, A. (2024) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-024-18116-6 · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Authors
- Phuong, J. M., Penm, J., Chaar, B., Oldfield, L. D., & Moles, R.
- Venue
- PLOS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2019-05-03
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- e0215837
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2943597722
- Cited by
- 251
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 28.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The impacts of medication shortages on patient outcomes: A scoping review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pone.0215837
- The paper
- Phuong, J. M., Penm, J., Chaar, B., Oldfield, L. D., & Moles, R. (2019). The impacts of medication shortages on patient outcomes: A scoping review. PLOS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215837
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.