Cited by 46Blood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesClinical practice guidelines implementationPrimary Care and Health Outcomes

Hypertension management in rural primary care facilities in Zambia: a mixed methods study

Open access
Yan, Lily D., Chirwa, Cindy, Chi, Benjamin H., Bosomprah, Samuel, Sindano, Ntazana, Mwanza, Moses, Musatwe, Dennis, Mulenga, Mary +1 more·2017·BMC Health Services Research

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Improved primary health care is needed in developing countries to effectively manage the growing burden of hypertension. Our objective was to evaluate hypertension management in Zambian rural primary care clinics using process and outcome indicators to assess the screening, monitoring, treatment and control of high blood pressure. METHODS: Better Health Outcomes through Mentoring and Assessment (BHOMA) is a 5-year, randomized stepped-wedge trial of improved clinical service delivery underway in 46 rural Zambian clinics. Clinical data were collected as part of routine patient care from an electronic medical record system, and reviewed for site performance over time according to hypertension related indicators: screening (blood pressure measurement), management (recorded diagnosis, physical exam or urinalysis), treatment (on medication), and control. Quantitative data was used to develop guides for qualitative in-depth interviews, conducted with health care providers at a proportional sample of half (20) of clinics. Qualitative data was iteratively analyzed for thematic content. RESULTS: From January 2011 to December 2014, 318,380 visits to 46 primary care clinics by adults aged ≥ 25 years with blood pressure measurements were included. Blood pressure measurement at vital sign screening was initially high at 89.1% overall (range: 70.1-100%), but decreased to 62.1% (range: 0-100%) by 48 months after intervention start. The majority of hypertensive patients made only one visit to the clinics (57.8%). Out of 9022 patients with at least two visits with an elevated blood pressure, only 49.3% had a chart recorded hypertension diagnosis. Process indicators for monitoring hypertension were <10% and did not improve with time. In in-depth interviews, antihypertensive medication shortages were common, with 15/20 clinics reporting hydrochlorothiazide-amiloride stockouts. Principal challenges in hypertension management included 1) equipment and personnel shortages, 2) provider belief that multiple visits were needed before official management, 3) medication stock-outs, leading to improper prescriptions and 4) poor patient visit attendance. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that numerous barriers stand in the way of hypertension diagnosis and management in Zambian primary health facilities. Future work should focus on performance indicator development and validation in low resource contexts, to facilitate regular and systematic data review to improve patient outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, Identifier NCT01942278 . Date of Registration: September 2013.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12913-017-2063-0

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Yan et al. 2017 was designed as a randomized stepped-wedge trial.

    “The study was designed as a randomized stepped-wedge trial.”

    From Applications and implementation considerations for stepped-wedge designs in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review (2026) · cites this paper as [79]

    The Methods (Study setting and design) identify BHOMA, the programme whose clinic data this paper analyzes, as a randomized stepped-wedge trial. They describe the hypertension management study itself as using an explanatory sequential design with quantitative analysis followed by a qualitative component. The claim conflates the parent trial’s design with this study’s design. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The stepped-wedge design in Yan et al. 2017 helps in evaluating the impact of the intervention while ensuring all clinics eventually receive it.

    “This design helps in evaluating the impact of the intervention while ensuring all clinics eventually receive it.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 29 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yan, L. D., Chirwa, C., Chi, B. H., Bosomprah, S., Sindano, N., Mwanza, M., Musatwe, D., Mulenga, M., & Chilengi, R.
Affiliations
  • Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia (ZM)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Corresponding author
Yan, Lily D.
Venue
BMC Health Services Research
Published
2017-02-03
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
111-111
ISSN
1472-6963 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2583624004
Cited by
46
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
2.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • BMC Health Services Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Doris Duke Charitable Foundation (2009060)
  • Comic Relief (146781)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
Keywords
antihypertensive therapy, rural primary care, blood pressure screening, hypertension diagnosis, vital signs monitoring, performance indicators, stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial, Zambia, resource-limited settings, electronic health records
MeSH terms
Adult, Antihypertensive Agents, Developing Countries, Female, Humans, Hypertension, Interviews as Topic, Male, Primary Health Care, Quality of Health Care, Zambia, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Rural Health Services, Qualitative Research, Quality Improvement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review