The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The composition of bacterial communities associated with plastic biofilms differs between different polymers and stages of biofilm succession
Open accessAbstract
Once in the ocean, plastics are rapidly colonized by complex microbial communities. Factors affecting the development and composition of these communities are still poorly understood. Additionally, whether there are plastic-type specific communities developing on different plastics remains enigmatic. We determined the development and succession of bacterial communities on different plastics under ambient and dim light conditions in the coastal Northern Adriatic over the course of two months using scanning electron microscopy and 16S rRNA gene analyses. Plastics used were low- and high-density polyethylene (LDPE and HDPE, respectively), polypropylene (PP) and polyvinyl chloride with two typical additives (PVC DEHP and PVC DINP). The bacterial communities developing on the plastics clustered in two groups; one group was found on PVC and the other group on all the other plastics and on glass, which was used as an inert control. Specific bacterial taxa were found on specific surfaces in essentially all stages of biofilm development and in both ambient and dim light conditions. Differences in bacterial community composition between the different plastics and light exposures were stronger after an incubation period of one week than at the later stages of the incubation. Under both ambient and dim light conditions, one part of the bacterial community was common on all plastic types, especially in later stages of the biofilm development, with families such as Flavobacteriaceae, Rhodobacteraceae, Planctomycetaceae and Phyllobacteriaceae presenting relatively high relative abundances on all surfaces. Another part of the bacterial community was plastic-type specific. The plastic-type specific fraction was variable among the different plastic types and was more abundant after one week of incubation than at later stages of the succession.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Life in the “plastisphere”: microbial communities on plastic marine debris
Zettler, E. R., Mincer, T. J., & Amaral-Zettler, L. A. (2013) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es401288x · Cited by 3,368
Microplastic pollution in deep-sea sediments
Van Cauwenberghe, L., Vanreusel, A., Mees, J., & Janssen, C. R. (2013) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2013.08.013 · Cited by 1,575
Mechanistic implications of plastic degradation
Singh, B., & Sharma, N. (2008) · Polymer Degradation and Stability · doi:10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2007.11.008 · Cited by 1,569
Rummel, C. D., Jahnke, A., Gorokhova, E., Kühnel, D., & Schmitt-Jansen, M. (2017) · Environmental Science & Technology Letters · doi:10.1021/acs.estlett.7b00164 · Cited by 1,444
Early microbial biofilm formation on marine plastic debris
Lobelle, D., & Cunliffe, M. (2011) · Marine Pollution Bulletin · doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2010.10.013 · Cited by 962
Dissolved organic carbon leaching from plastics stimulates microbial activity in the ocean
Romera-Castillo, C., Pinto, M., Langer, T. M., Álvarez-Salgado, X. A., & Herndl, G. J. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-03798-5 · Cited by 753
Self-citationFazey, F. M. C., & Ryan, P. G. (2016) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2016.01.026 · Cited by 588
Production of methane and ethylene from plastic in the environment
Royer, S.-J., Ferrón, S., Wilson, S. T., & Karl, D. M. (2018) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0200574 · Cited by 572
Oberbeckmann, S., Osborn, A. M., & Duhaime, M. B. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0159289 · Cited by 572
Oberbeckmann, S., Loeder, M. G. J., Gerdts, G., & Osborn, A. M. (2014) · FEMS Microbiology Ecology · doi:10.1111/1574-6941.12409 · Cited by 540
Cited by
Marine Plastic Debris: A New Surface for Microbial Colonization
Wright, R. J., Erni-Cassola, G., Zadjelovic, V., Latva, M., & Christie-Oleza, J. A. (2020) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.0c02305 · Cited by 513
Microbial colonization and degradation of marine microplastics in the plastisphere: A review
Zhai, X., Zhang, X.-H., & Yu, M. (2023) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2023.1127308 · Cited by 281
Bioavailability of microplastics to marine zooplankton: effect of shape and infochemicals
Botterell, Z. L. R., Beaumont, N., Cole, M., Hopkins, F. E., Steinke, M., Thompson, R. C., & Lindeque, P. K. (2020) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.0c02715 · Cited by 193
Microbial colonization of microplastics in the Caribbean Sea
Dudek, K. L., Cruz, B. N., Polidoro, B., & Neuer, S. (2020) · Limnology and Oceanography Letters · doi:10.1002/lol2.10141 · Cited by 162
Microbial Degradation of Marine Plastics: Current State and Future Prospects
Vaksmaa, A., Hernando-Morales, V., Zeghal, E., & Niemann, H. (2021) · Biotechnology for Sustainable Environment · doi:10.1007/978-981-16-1955-7_5 · Cited by 50
Metadata
- Authors
- Pinto, M., Langer, T. M., Hüffer, T., Hofmann, T., & Herndl, G. J.
- Venue
- PLOS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2019-06-05
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- e0217165
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2948175614
- Cited by
- 323
- References
- 11
- FWCI
- 9.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The composition of bacterial communities associated with plastic biofilms differs between different polymers and stages of biofilm succession. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pone.0217165
- The paper
- Pinto, M., Langer, T. M., Hüffer, T., Hofmann, T., & Herndl, G. J. (2019). The composition of bacterial communities associated with plastic biofilms differs between different polymers and stages of biofilm succession. PLOS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217165
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.