Cited by 1,444Microplastics and Plastic PollutionPharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental ImpactsEnvironmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology

Impacts of biofilm formation on the fate and potential effects of microplastic in the aquatic environment

Open access
Rummel, Christoph D., Jahnke, Annika, Gorokhova, Elena, Kühnel, Dana, Schmitt-Jansen, Mechthild·2017·Environmental Science & Technology Letters

Abstract

Abstract In the aquatic environment, microplastic (MP; <5 mm) is a cause of concern because of its persistence and potential adverse effects on biota. Studies of microlitter impacts are mostly based on virgin and spherical polymer particles as model MP. However, in pelagic and benthic environments, surfaces are always colonized by microorganisms forming so-called biofilms. The influence of such biofilms on the fate and potential effects of MP is not understood well. Here, we review the physical interactions of early microbial colonization on plastic surfaces and their reciprocal influence on the weathering processes and vertical transport as well as sorption and release of contaminants by MP. Possible ecological consequences of biofilm formation on MP, such as trophic transfer of MP particles and potential adverse effects of MP, are virtually unknown. However, evidence is accumulating that the biofilm−plastic interactions have the capacity to influence the fate and impacts of MP by modifying the physical properties of the particles. There is an urgent research need to better understand these interactions and increase the ecological relevance of current laboratory testing by simulating field conditions in which microbial life is a key driver of biogeochemical processes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.estlett.7b00164

Cites

151 of 151 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rummel, C. D., Jahnke, A., Gorokhova, E., Kühnel, D., & Schmitt-Jansen, M.
Affiliations
  • Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (DE)
  • Stockholm University (SE)
  • Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research-UFZ , , Permoserstrasse 15 , ,
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology Letters
Published
2017-06-13
Volume
4
Issue
7
Pages
258-267
ISSN
2328-8930 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2625112519
Cited by
1,444
References
151
Citations by year
2026: 162 · 2025: 192 · 2024: 212 · 2023: 196 · 2022: 226 · 2021: 210 · 2020: 134 · 2019: 69 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 5
FWCI
30.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Environmental Science & Technology Letters (publishedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas (942-2015-1866)
  • Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (03Ff0733A, 03Ff0733B)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
Keywords
microplastics, biofilm formation, microbial colonization of plastic, microplastic weathering, vertical transport, trophic transfer, microplastic fate, aquatic environment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review