Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 30

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Radiocarbon dating and cultural dynamics across Mongolia’s early pastoral transition

Taylor, William, Wilkin, Shevan, Wright, Joshua, Dee, Michael, Erdene, Myagmar, Clark, Julia, Tuvshinjargal, Tumurbaatar, Bayarsaikhan, Jamsranjav, Fitzhugh, William, Boivin, Nicole·2019·PLOS ONE

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0224241

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Fig 1 Study area and general regions referred to in the analysis.
Fig 1 Study area and general regions referred to in the analysis.CC0 · PubMed Central
Fig 2 Chemurchek burial mound in western Mongolia, along with accompanying standing stone Fig. Photo: T. Tuvshinjargal.
Fig 2 Chemurchek burial mound in western Mongolia, along with accompanying standing stone Fig. Photo: T. Tuvshinjargal.CC0 · PubMed Central
Fig 3 Slab burial built of uprooted deer stones at the site of Shatar Chuluu in Bayankhongor, central Mongolia.
Fig 3 Slab burial built of uprooted deer stones at the site of Shatar Chuluu in Bayankhongor, central Mongolia.CC0 · PubMed Central
Fig 4 Modeled start boundaries for Bronze and Early Iron Age traditions in Mongolia, showing relative ordering according to posterior results. For each tradition with available data, the quality control-restricted model estimates are provided as an uncolored distribution outlined in black.
Fig 4 Modeled start boundaries for Bronze and Early Iron Age traditions in Mongolia, showing relative ordering according to posterior results. For each tradition with available data, the quality control-restricted model estimates are provided as an uncolored distribution outlined in black.CC0 · PubMed Central
Fig 5 Posterior probability estimates for modeled dates according to cultural group. For each timeslice, the width of each circle corresponds to the portion of modeled posterior distribution that falls within the timeslice. Mounds with a published radiocarbon date, but not conforming to available cultural categories are marked in yellow as “Indet".
Fig 5 Posterior probability estimates for modeled dates according to cultural group. For each timeslice, the width of each circle corresponds to the portion of modeled posterior distribution that falls within the timeslice. Mounds with a published radiocarbon date, but not conforming to available cultural categories are marked in yellow as “Indet".CC0 · PubMed Central
Fig 6 Posterior probability estimates for modeled dates according to burial position. For each box, the width of each circle corresponds to the portion of modeled posterior distribution that falls within the timeslice.
Fig 6 Posterior probability estimates for modeled dates according to burial position. For each box, the width of each circle corresponds to the portion of modeled posterior distribution that falls within the timeslice.CC0 · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

3 more claims about this paper

Create a free account to see every claim other papers make about this one.

See all claims — free account

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 45

  1. PB de Damgaard, 2018, 137 ancient human genomes from across the Eurasian steppes, Nature, 557, 369, 10.1038/s41586-018-0094-2 · DOI · Paper page
  2. C Gaunitz, 2018, Ancient genomes revisit the ancestry of domestic and Przewalski’s horses, Science
  3. C Jeong, 2018, Bronze Age population dynamics and the rise of dairy pastoralism on the eastern Eurasian steppe, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 115, E11248, 10.1073/pnas.1813608115 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Wilkin, S, Ventresca MillerA. Taylor WTT, Hagan RH, Bleasdale M, Horton M, et al. Dairy pastoralism drove ancient Eastern Eurasian Steppe expansions. In Review at Nature Ecology and Evolution.
  5. CA Makarewicz, Isotopic evidence for ceremonial provisioning of Late Bronze age khirigsuurs with horses from diverse geographic locales, Quat Int. Elsevier Ltd
  6. J-L Houle, 2010, Emergent complexity on the Mongolian steppe: Mobility, territoriality, and the development of early nomadic polities
  7. WTT Taylor, 2015, Equine cranial morphology and the identification of riding and chariotry in late Bronze Age Mongolia, Antiquity. Cambridge University Press, 89, 854
  8. WTT Taylor, 2017, A Bayesian chronology for early domestic horse use in the Eastern Steppe, J Archaeol Sci, 81, 49, 10.1016/j.jas.2017.03.006 · DOI · Paper page
  9. SH Lees, 1974, The Origins of Specialized Nomadic Pastoralism: A Systemic Model, American Antiquity, 187, 10.2307/279581 · DOI
  10. AM Khazanov, 1994, Nomads and the outside world
  11. O Lattimore, 1962, Inner Asian Frontiers of China
  12. J Wright, 2006, The Adoption of Pastoralism in Northeast Asia: Monumental Transformation in the Egiin Gol Valley, Mongolia
  13. JK Clark, 2014, Modeling late prehistoric and early historic pastoral adaptations in northern Mongolia’s Darkhad Depression
  14. L Janz, 2016, Curr Anthropol
  15. S.V. Svyatko, 2009, New Radiocarbon Dates and a Review of the Chronology of Prehistoric Populations from the Minusinsk Basin, Southern Siberia, Russia, Radiocarbon, 51, 243, 10.1017/S0033822200033798 · DOI
  16. W. Honeychurch, 2016, The Archaeology of pastoral nomadism, Annual Review of Anthropology, 45, 341, 10.1146/annurev-anthro-102215-095827 · DOI
  17. AA Kovalev, 2009, Discovery of new cultures of the Bronze Age in Mongolia according to the data obtained by the International Central Asian Archaeological Expedition, Current archaeological research in Mongolia, 149
  18. A Kovalev, 2014, Earliest European in the heart of Asia: the Chemurchek cultural phenomen
  19. LL Rogers, 2016, Understanding ancient human population genetics of the eastern Eurasian steppe through mitochondrial DNA analysis: Central Mongolian samples from the Neolithic, Bronze Age, Iron Age and Mongol Empire periods
  20. L Janz, 2017, Transitions in Palaeoecology and Technology: Hunter-Gatherers and Early Herders in the Gobi Desert, Journal of World Prehistory, 30, 1, 10.1007/s10963-016-9100-5 · DOI · Paper page
  21. PWM Jia, 2010, A re-analysis of the Qiemu’erqieke (Shamirshak) cemeteries, Xinjiang, China, Journal of Indo-European Studies. Institute for the Study of Man, 38, 275
  22. WTT Taylor, 2016, Reconstructing Equine Bridles in the Mongolian Bronze Age, J Ethnobiol. Society of Ethnobiology, 36, 554, 10.2993/0278-0771-36.3.554 · DOI
  23. WTT Taylor, 2017, Horse demography and use in Bronze Age Mongolia, Quat Int, 436, 270, 10.1016/j.quaint.2015.09.085 · DOI
  24. WTT Taylor, 2018, Origins of equine dentistry, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
  25. Taylo WTT, Clark J, Tuvshinargal T, Thompson Jobe J, Spengler III R, Shnaider S et al. et al. In review. Early Pastoral Economies and Herding Transitions in the Bronze Age Eurasian Steppes. Paper submitted to Nature:Scientific Reports, January 2019. · DOI
  26. Bemmann, J., Brosseder, U., Gantulga, J.-O., Grupe, G., McGlynn, G., Reichert, S., Yeruul-Erdene, Ch., 2015. Bioarchaeological Research on the Bronze and Iron Age Cemetery of Maikhan Tolgoi, Upper Orkhon Valley, Central Mongolia, in: Basarov, B.V. (Ed.), Актуальные Вопросы Археологии и Этнологии Центральной Азии: Изд-во «Оттиск», Иркутск, pp. 188–199.
  27. J Bourgeois, 2017, Geometric stone settings in the Yustyd Valley and its surroundings (Altai Mountains, Russia): Bronze Age “virtual dwellings” and associated structures, Archaeological Research in Asia. Elsevier, 10, 17, 10.1016/j.ara.2017.02.003 · DOI
  28. WW Fitzhugh, 2009, Stone Shamans and Flying Deer of Northern Mongolia: Deer Goddess of Siberia or Chimera of the Steppe?, Arctic Anthropol, 46, 72, 10.1353/arc.0.0025 · DOI · Paper page
  29. T Turbat, 2011, Deer stones of the Jargalantyn Am, Mongolian Tangible Heritage Association NGO, Ulaanbaatar, 192
  30. N Zwyns, 2014, The open-air site of Tolbor 16 (Northern Mongolia): Preliminary results and perspectives, Quat Int, 347, 53, 10.1016/j.quaint.2014.05.043 · DOI
  31. J Wright, 2016, Households without Houses: Mobility and Moorings on the Eurasian Steppe, J Anthropol Res, 72, 133, 10.1086/686297 · DOI
  32. G Eregzen, 2016, Ancient Funeral Monuments of Mongolia
  33. B Philippsen, 2013, The freshwater reservoir effect in radiocarbon dating, Heritage Science. Nature Publishing Group, 1, 24, 10.1186/2050-7445-1-24 · DOI
  34. MB Schiffer, 1986, Radiocarbon dating and the “old wood” problem: The case of the Hohokam chronology, J Archaeol Sci, 13, 13, 10.1016/0305-4403(86)90024-5 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Bronk Ramsey C, Schulting R, Goriunova OI, Bazaliiskii VI, Weber AW. Analyzing Radiocarbon Reservoir Offsets Through Stable Nitrogen Isotopes and Bayesian Modeling: A Case Study Using Paired Human and Faunal Remains from the Cis-Baikal Region, Siberia [Internet]. Radiocarbon. 2014. pp. 789–799. · DOI
  36. A Zazzo, 2019, High-precision dating of ceremonial activity around a large ritual complex in Late Bronze Age Mongolia, Antiquity. Cambridge University Press, 93, 80
  37. F. Brock, 2010, Current Pretreatment Methods for AMS Radiocarbon Dating at the Oxford Radiocarbon Accelerator Unit (ORAU), Radiocarbon, 52, 103, 10.1017/S0033822200045069 · DOI
  38. C Bronk Ramsey, 2009, Bayesian Analysis of Radiocarbon Dates, Radiocarbon. Cambridge University Press, 51, 337
  39. JW Eerkens, 2013, The Evolution of a Cemetery: Rapid Change in Burial Practices in a Middle Holocene Site in Central Alta California, California Archaeology. Routledge, 5, 3, 10.1179/1947461X13Z.0000000005 · DOI
  40. C. Renfrew, 1976, Acculturation and Continuity in Atlantic Europe, 198
  41. I. Hughes, 1988, Megaliths: Space, time and the landscape—a view from Cylde, Scottish Archaeological Review, 5, 41
  42. J. Wright, 2017, The honest labour of stone mounds: monuments of Bronze and Iron Age Mongolia as costly signals, World Archaeology, 49, 547, 10.1080/00438243.2017.1360791 · DOI
  43. IV Chechushkov, 2018, Eurasian Steppe Chariots and Social Complexity During the Bronze Age, Journal of World Prehistory, 31, 435, 10.1007/s10963-018-9124-0 · DOI
  44. M Klinge, 2019, Spatial pattern of Late Glacial and Holocene climatic and environmental development in Western Mongolia—A critical review and synthesis, Quat Sci Rev, 210, 26, 10.1016/j.quascirev.2019.02.020 · DOI
  45. H Parzinger, 2010, Der skythenzeitliche Fürstenkurgan Arzan 2 in Tuva—Ergebnisse und weiterführende Betrachtungen, Der skythenzeitliche Fürstenkurgan Arzan, 2, 303

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Taylor, W., Wilkin, S., Wright, J., Dee, M., Erdene, M., Clark, J., Tuvshinjargal, T., Bayarsaikhan, J., Fitzhugh, W., & Boivin, N.
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2019-11-06
Volume
14
Issue
11
Pages
e0224241
ISSN
1932-6203
Cited by
30
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review