An examination of the Kuleshov effect using still photographs
Open accessAbstract
The goal of the present study was to examine whether the effect of visual context on the interpretation of facial expression from an actor's face could be produced using isolated photographic stills, instead of the typical dynamic film sequences used to demonstrate the effect. Two-photograph sequences consisting of a context photograph varying in pleasantness and a photograph of an actor's neutral face were presented. Participants performed a liking rating task for the context photograph (to ensure attention to the stimulus) and they performed three tasks for the face stimulus: labeling the emotion portrayed by the actor, rating valence, and rating arousal. The results of the labeling data confirmed the existence of a visual context effect, with more faces labeled as "happy" after viewing pleasant context and more faces labeled "sad" or "fearful" after viewing unpleasant context. This effect was demonstrated when no explicit connection between the context stimulus and face stimulus was invoked, with the contextual information exerting its effect on labeling after being held in memory for at least 10 seconds. The results for ratings of valence and arousal were mixed. Overall, the results suggest that isolated photograph sequences produce a Kuleshov-type context effect on attributions of emotion to actors' faces, replicating previous research conducted with dynamic film sequences.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
The Kuleshov Effect: the influence of contextual framing on emotional attributions
Mobbs, D., Weiskopf, N., Lau, H. C., Featherstone, E., Dolan, R. J., & Frith, C. D. (2006) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsl014 · Cited by 178 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Mullennix, J., Barber, J., & Cory, T.
- Affiliations
- University of Pittsburgh at Johnstown (US)
- Corresponding author
- Mullennix, John
- ORCID
- Mullennix, John
- Venue
- PLOS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2019-10-31
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- e0224623
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC6822748
- OpenAlex
- W2982638734
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 0.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
- Keywords
- Kuleshov effect, visual context, facial expression interpretation, emotion labeling, emotional valence, emotional arousal, context effects, liking ratings
- MeSH terms
- Facial Recognition, Adult, Attention, Emotions, Facial Expression, Fear, Female, Happiness, Humans, Male, Motion Pictures, Photic Stimulation, Photography, Social Perception, Visual Perception, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review