Cited by 33Intimate Partner and Family ViolenceStalking, Cyberstalking, and HarassmentElder Abuse and Neglect

‘When you talk to someone in a bad way or always put her under pressure, it is actually worse than beating her’: Conceptions and experiences of emotional intimate partner violence in Rwanda and South Africa

Open access
Stern, Erin, Gibbs, Andrew, Willan, Samantha, Dunkle, Kristin, Jewkes, Rachel·2019·PLOS ONE

Abstract

Emotional intimate partner violence (IPV) is extremely common and has significant health and social consequences, yet typically receives much less attention in research and programming than physical and sexual IPV. This limits our understanding of how women experience and understand emotional IPV in different settings, which is required to inform effective prevention and response. This paper draws on qualitative data collected in mixed-methods impact evaluations of two IPV prevention programmes conducted as part of the What Works to Prevent Violence Against Women and Girls Global Programme. In doing so, we seek to develop a more nuanced understanding of the forms, causes and consequences of emotional IPV in heterosexual relationships in two distinct African settings. We draw on two rounds of in-depth interviews conducted with 15 women in South Africa and three rounds of interviews conducted with 57 women and men in Rwanda, all of whom were participants in the programmes, around their experiences of and conceptualizations of emotional IPV. Thematic analysis around emotional IPV was conducted and compared across both data sets, informed by a cross comparative analysis approach. The analysis found that the categories or types of acts perceived as emotional IPV by women experienced were similar across settings. Women in both contexts described public humiliation, control of mobility, access to housing and silencing as important categories of actions experienced emotional IPV. These types of emotional IPV were underpinned by similar patterns of gender inequalities, with the intention for men to assert control and power over women. The specific acts through which these categories of emotional IPV manifested in the two settings arose from contextual differences related to the social structure of relationships and dominant social norms. This analysis highlights commonalities in the underlying categorial understanding of IPV in two distinct African settings, and well as the differences in specific manifestations which stem from the social context of relationships. In doing so, we highlight both broad categorical areas of IPV that may be important to address in future research and prevention programming, as well as affirming the need for information on context-specific manifestations of emotional IPV to inform local intervention programmes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0225121

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 29 · Cited by 33

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. [1]Follingstad DR. The Impact of Psychological Aggression on Women's Mental Health and Behavior: The Status of the Field. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse. 2009; 10(3): 271– 89. 19460760
  2. [2]Durevall D, Lindskog A. Intimate partner violence and HIV in ten sub-Saharan African countries: what do the Demographic and Health Surveys tell us? The Lancet Global Health. 2015; 3(1): e34– e43. 10.1016/S2214-109X(14)70343-2 25539967 · DOI
  3. [5]Jewkes R. Intimate partner violence as a risk factor for mental ill-health in South Africa Garcia-Moreno C, Riecher-Rossler A. Violence against Women and Mental Health, 65– 74. Karger, 2013.
  4. [7]Jewkes R. Emotional abuse: a neglected dimension of partner violence. Lancet (London, England). 2010; 376(9744): 851– 2. 20822808
  5. [9]Gibbs A, Mushinga M, Crone E.T, Willan S, Mannell J. How do National Strategic Plans for HIV and AIDS in southern and eastern Africa integrate gender-based violence? Health and Human Rights. 2012, 14(2): 1– 11. 23568943
  6. [10]Gibbs A, Jewkes R, Willan S, Washington L. Associations between poverty and intimate partner violence amongst young women and men in urban informal settlements in South Africa: a cross-sectional study and structural equation model. PLoS One. 2018; 13(10): e0204956. 30281677 PMC6169941
  7. [12]Hunter M. The changing political economy of sex in South Africa: the significance of unemployment and inequalities to the scale of the AIDS pandemic. Social Science & Medicine. 2007; 64(3): 689– 700. 17097204
  8. [14]Gibbs A, Washington L, Willan S, Ntini N, Khumalo T, Mbatha N, et al The Stepping Stones and Creating Futures intervention to prevent intimate partner violence and HIV-risk behaviours in Durban, South Africa: study protocol for a cluster randomized control trial, and baseline characteristics. BMC Public Health. 2017; 17(1): 336 10.1186/s12889-017-4223-x 28427380 PMC5397780 · DOI
  9. [15]Willan S, Ntini N, Gibbs A, Jewkes, R. “If he loves you he can hit you, but not injure you.” Exploring young women’s constructions of love and strategies to navigate violent relationships in South African informal settlements. Culture, Health & Sexuality. 2019. 30632915
  10. [16]Umubyeyi A, Mogren I, Ntaganira J, Krantz G. Women are considerably more exposed to intimate partner violence than men in Rwanda: results from a population-based, cross-sectional study. BMC Women's Health. 2014; 14: 99 10.1186/1472-6874-14-99 25155576 PMC4148406 · DOI
  11. [18]Umubyeyi A, Persson M, Mogren I, Krantz G. Gender Inequality Prevents Abused Women from Seeking Care Despite Protection Given in Gender-Based Violence Legislation: A Qualitative Study from Rwanda. PLOS ONE. 2016; 11(5): e0154540 10.1371/journal.pone.0154540 27152680 PMC4859471 · DOI
  12. [20]Sommers M. Stuck: Rwandan Youth and the Struggle for Adulthood. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press, 2012.
  13. [22]Polavarapu A. Procuring Meaningful Land Rights for the Women of Rwanda. Yale Human Rights and Development Law Journal. 2011; 14(1): 3.
  14. [24]Uwineza P, Pearson E. Sustaining Women’s Gains in Rwanda: The Influence of indigenous Culture and Post-Genocide Politics. Washington, DC: Institute for Inclusive Security, 2009.
  15. [25]Stern E, Niyaratunga, R. A process review of the Indashyikirwa couples curriculum to prevent intimate partner violence and support healthy, equitable relationships in Rwanda. Journal of Social Sciences: Special Edition on Select Papers from Conference on Global Status of Women and Girls. 2017; 6(63).
  16. [26]Stern E, Martins S, Stefanik L, Uwimphuwe S, Yaker R. Lessons learned from implementing Indashyikirwa in Rwanda- an adaptation of the SASA! approach to prevent and respond to intimate partner violence. Evaluation & Program Planning. 2018, 71: 58– 67. 30125773
  17. [29]Carlson K, Randell S. Gender and development: Working with men for gender equality in Rwanda. Agenda. 2013; 27(1): 114– 25.
  18. [30]Conroy AA, McGrath N, van Rooyen H, Hosegood V, Johnson MO, Fritz K, et al Power and the association with relationship quality in South African couples: Implications for HIV/AIDS interventions. Social Science & Medicine. 2016; 153: 1– 11. 26859436 PMC4788545
  19. [31]Jewkes R, Penn-Kekana L, Levin J, Ratsaka M, Schrieber M. Prevalence of emotional, physical and sexual abuse of women in three South African provinces. SAMJ. 2001, 91(5): 421– 428. 11455808
  20. [32]Fletcher GJO, Simpson JA, Thomas G. The Measurement of Perceived Relationship Quality Components: A Confirmatory Factor Analytic Approach. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2000; 26(3): 340– 54.
  21. [33]Lewis MA, McBride CM, Pollak KI, Puleo E, Butterfield RM, Emmons KM. Understanding health behavior change among couples: an interdependence and communal coping approach. Social Science & Medicine. 2006; 62(6): 1369– 80. 16146666

Authors
Stern, E., Gibbs, A., Willan, S., Dunkle, K., & Jewkes, R.
Affiliations
  • London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
  • South African Medical Research Council (ZA)
Corresponding author
Stern, Erin
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2019-11-14
Volume
14
Issue
11
Pages
e0225121
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2987431393
Cited by
33
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4
FWCI
2.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Department for International Development (What Works to Prevent Violence against Women and Girls Programme)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Elder Abuse and Neglect
Keywords
violence against women, public humiliation, housing control, silencing, gender inequality, social norms, heterosexual couples, women's experiences of violence, Rwanda, South Africa
MeSH terms
Intimate Partner Violence, Communication, Emotions, Female, Humans, Male, Rwanda, Sex Factors, Social Behavior, South Africa

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review