Cited by 27Populism, Right-Wing MovementsSocial Media and PoliticsMisinformation and Its Impacts

The effects of local socio-political events on group cohesion in online far-right communities

Open access
Bliuc, Ana-Maria, Betts, John M., Faulkner, Nicholas, Vergani, Matteo, Chow, Rui Jie, Iqbal, Muhammad, Best, David·2020·PLOS ONE

Abstract

In recent years, the reach and influence of far-right ideologies have been extended through online communities with devastating effects in the real world. In this research, we examine how far-right online communities can be empowered by socio-political events that are significant to them. Using over 14 years of data extracted from an Australian national sub-forum of a global online white supremacist community, we investigate whether the group cohesion of the community is affected by local race riots. Our analysis shows that the online community, not only became more cohesive after the riots, but was also reinvigorated by highly active new members who joined during the week of the riots or soon after. These changes were maintained over the longer-term, highlighting pervasive ramifications of the local socio-political context for this white supremacist community. Pre-registered analyses of data extracted from other white supremacist online communities (in South Africa and the United Kingdom) show similar effects on some of the indicators of group cohesion, but of reduced magnitude, and not as enduring as the effects found in the context of the Australian far-right online community.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0230302

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is evidence for an association between increased social media use and online right-wing radicalization in Austria, Sweden and Australia.

    “There is also evidence for an association between increased social media use and online right-wing radicalization in Austria, Sweden and Australia135–137.”

    From A systematic review of worldwide causal and correlational evidence on digital media and democracy (2022) · cites this paper as [136]

    The Introduction describes online far-right communities as sources of support for extremists, and the Discussion and conclusion says an Australian attacker was at least partly radicalised online. The study also finds increased activity in an Australian far-right forum after the Cronulla Riots. It does not establish an association between increased social media use and individual radicalization; its other study locations are South Africa and the UK, not Austria or Sweden. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 44 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. M Wines, 2015, White Supremacists Extend Their Reach Through Websites
  2. DD Kilpatrick, 2019, Massacre Suspect Traveled the World but Lived on the Internet
  3. JC Turner, 1991, Social influence
  4. E Hannan, 2005, Nationalists boast of their role on the beach

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bliuc, A.-M., Betts, J. M., Faulkner, N., Vergani, M., Chow, R. J., Iqbal, M., & Best, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Dundee (GB)
  • Monash University (AU)
  • Deakin University (AU)
  • Victoria University (AU)
  • University of Derby (GB)
Corresponding author
Bliuc, Ana-Maria
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2020-03-30
Volume
15
Issue
3
Pages
e0230302
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3013282742
Cited by
27
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1
FWCI
13.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Victoria University Research Repository (Victoria University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Monash University Research Portal (Monash University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • University of Derby Online Research Archive. (University of Derby) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Australian Research Council (LP120200115)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Populism, Right-Wing Movements
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
Keywords
white supremacy, group cohesion, socio-political events, race riots, new member recruitment, far-right ideology
MeSH terms
Australia, Group Processes, Humans, Mass Behavior, Politics, Social Media, Racism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review