The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Estimating the burden of United States workers exposed to infection or disease: A key factor in containing risk of COVID-19 infection
Open accessAbstract
INTRODUCTION: With the global spread of COVID-19, there is a compelling public health interest in quantifying who is at increased risk of contracting disease. Occupational characteristics, such as interfacing with the public and being in close quarters with other workers, not only put workers at high risk for disease, but also make them a nexus of disease transmission to the community. This can further be exacerbated through presenteeism, the term used to describe the act of coming to work despite being symptomatic for disease. Quantifying the number of workers who are frequently exposed to infection and disease in the workplace, and understanding which occupational groups they represent, can help to prompt public health risk response and management for COVID-19 in the workplace, and subsequent infectious disease outbreaks. METHODS: To estimate the number of United States workers frequently exposed to infection and disease in the workplace, national employment data (by Standard Occupational Classification) maintained by the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) was merged with a BLS O*NET survey measure reporting how frequently workers in each occupation are exposed to infection or disease at work. This allowed us to estimate the number of United States workers, across all occupations, exposed to disease or infection at work more than once a month. RESULTS: Based on our analyses, approximately 10% (14.4 M) of United States workers are employed in occupations where exposure to disease or infection occurs at least once per week. Approximately 18.4% (26.7 M) of all United States workers are employed in occupations where exposure to disease or infection occurs at least once per month. While the majority of exposed workers are employed in healthcare sectors, other occupational sectors also have high proportions of exposed workers. These include protective service occupations (e.g. police officers, correctional officers, firefighters), office and administrative support occupations (e.g. couriers and messengers, patient service representatives), education occupations (e.g. preschool and daycare teachers), community and social services occupations (community health workers, social workers, counselors), and even construction and extraction occupations (e.g. plumbers, septic tank installers, elevator repair). CONCLUSIONS: The large number of persons employed in occupations with frequent exposure to infection and disease underscore the importance of all workplaces developing risk response plans for COVID-19. Given the proportion of the United States workforce exposed to disease or infection at work, this analysis also serves as an important reminder that the workplace is a key locus for public health interventions, which could protect both workers and the communities they serve.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Wu, Z., & McGoogan, J. M. (2020) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2020.2648 · Cited by 17,016
Occupational risks for COVID-19 infection
Koh, D. (2020) · Occupational Medicine · doi:10.1093/occmed/kqaa036 · Cited by 534
Bergström, G., Bodin, L., Hagberg, J., Aronsson, G., & Josephson, M. (2009) · Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine · doi:10.1097/jom.0b013e3181a8281b · Cited by 360
Occupational cancer burden in Great Britain
Rushton, L., Hutchings, S. J., Fortunato, L., Young, C., Evans, G. S., Brown, T., Bevan, R., Slack, R., Holmes, P., Bagga, S., et al. (2012) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/bjc.2012.112 · Cited by 253
Sickness presenteeism at work: prevalence, costs and management
Kinman, G. (2019) · British Medical Bulletin · doi:10.1093/bmb/ldy043 · Cited by 172
A systematic review of infectious illness Presenteeism: prevalence, reasons and risk factors
Webster, R. K., Liu, R., Karimullina, K., Hall, I., Amlôt, R., & Rubin, G. J. (2019) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-019-7138-x · Cited by 160
Biron, C., Brun, J., Ivers, H., & Cooper, C. L. (2006) · Journal of Public Mental Health · doi:10.1108/17465729200600029 · Cited by 156
The global burden due to occupational injury
Concha‐Barrientos, M., Nelson, D. I., Fingerhut, M. A., et al. (2005) · American Journal of Industrial Medicine · doi:10.1002/ajim.20226 · Cited by 151
The proportion of cancer attributable to occupational exposures
Purdue, M. P., Hutchings, S. J., Rushton, L., & Silverman, D. T. (2015) · Annals of Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.annepidem.2014.11.009 · Cited by 127
Yang, T., Guo, Y., Ma, M., Li, Y., Tian, H., & Deng, J. (2017) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph14090978 · Cited by 126
Cited by
Wise, T., Zbozinek, T. D., Michelini, G., Hagan, C. C., & Mobbs, D. (2020) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.200742 · Cited by 734
Stawicki, S., Jeanmonod, R., Miller, A., Paladino, L., Gaieski, D., Yaffee, A., De Wulf, A., Grover, J., Papadimos, T., Bloem, C., et al. (2020) · Journal of Global Infectious Diseases · doi:10.4103/jgid.jgid_86_20 · Cited by 373
Early evidence of the impacts of COVID-19 on minority unemployment
Couch, K. A., Fairlie, R. W., & Xu, H. (2020) · Journal of Public Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104287 · Cited by 282
The COVID-19 Pandemic and its Effect on Mental Health in USA—A Review with Some Coping Strategies
Bhattacharjee, B., & Acharya, T. (2020) · Psychiatric Quarterly · doi:10.1007/s11126-020-09836-0 · Cited by 115
“Currently, 144 million professionals are employed in United States and approximately 10% of them are employed in occupations where exposure to the disease or infection may occur atleast once a week [16].”
BackgroundPandemic-related mental health risk among front line personnel
Wright, H. M., Griffin, B. J., Shoji, K., Love, T. M., Langenecker, S. A., Benight, C. C., & Smith, A. J. (2021) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2020.10.045 · Cited by 69
Metadata
- Authors
- Baker, M. G., Peckham, T. K., & Seixas, N. S.
- Venue
- PLOS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2020-04-28
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- e0232452
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3017430478
- Cited by
- 437
- References
- 22
- FWCI
- 14.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Estimating the burden of United States workers exposed to infection or disease: A key factor in containing risk of COVID-19 infection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pone.0232452
- The paper
- Baker, M. G., Peckham, T. K., & Seixas, N. S. (2020). Estimating the burden of United States workers exposed to infection or disease: A key factor in containing risk of COVID-19 infection. PLOS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232452
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.