Cited by 282Labor market dynamics and wage inequalityCOVID-19 Pandemic ImpactsNames, Identity, and Discrimination Research

Early evidence of the impacts of COVID-19 on minority unemployment

Open access
Couch, Kenneth A., Fairlie, Robert W., Xu, Huanan·2020·Journal of Public Economics

Abstract

This paper provides early evidence of the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on minority unemployment in the United States. In the first month following March adoptions of social distancing measures by states, unemployment rose to 14.5% but a much higher 24.4% when we correct for potential data misclassification noted by the BLS. Using the official definition, unemployment in April 2020 among African-Americans rose by less than what would have been anticipated (to 16.6%) based on previous recessions, and the long-term ordering of unemployment across racial/ethnic groups was altered with Latinx unemployment (18.2%) rising for the first time to the highest among major groups. Difference-in-difference estimates confirm that the initial gap in unemployment between whites and blacks in April was not different than in periods prior to the pandemic; however, the racial gap expanded as unemployment for whites declined in the next two months but was largely stagnant for blacks. The initially large gap in unemployment between whites and Latinx in April was sustained in May and June as unemployment declined similarly for both groups. Non-linear decompositions show a favorable industry distribution partly protected black employment during the early stages of the pandemic, but that an unfavorable occupational distribution and lower average skills levels placed them at higher risk of job losses. An unfavorable occupational distribution and lower skills contributed to a sharply widened Latinx-white unemployment gap that moderated over time as rehiring occurred. These findings of disproportionate impacts on minority unemployment raise important concerns regarding lost earnings and wealth, and longer-term consequences of the pandemic on racial inequality in the United States.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104287

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Baker, Marissa G., Trevor K. Peckham, and Noah S. Selxas. 2020. “Estimating the burden of U.S. workers exposed to infection or disease: a key factor in containing risk of COVID-19 infection”. PLoS ONE 15(4): e0232452. PMC7188235 32343747
  2. Bartik Alexander W. Bertrand Marianne Ling Feng Rothstein Jesse Unrath Matthew Measuring the Labor Market at the Onset of the COVID-19 Crisis 2020 BPEA Conference Draft Summer
  3. Couch Kenneth Fairlie Robert Last hired, first fired? Black-White unemployment and the business cycle Demography 47 1 2010 227 247 20355692 PMC3000014
  4. Couch, Kenneth, Robert Fairlie, and Huanan Xu. 2020. “The Impacts of COVID-19 on Minority Unemployment: First Evidence From April 2020 CPS Microdata,” Stanford University, SIEPR WP 20-021, May 20, 2020, and NBER WP 27246. PMC7489888 32952224
  5. Dingel Jonathan I. Neiman Brent How many jobs can be done at home? J. Public Econ. 189 2020 1 8 PMC7346841 32834177
  6. Gupta, Sumedha, Laura Montenovo, Thuy D. Nguyen, Felipe Lozano Rojas, Ian M. Schmutte, Kosali I. Simon, Bruce A. Weinberg, and Coady Wing. 2020. Effects of Social Distancing Policy on Labor Market Outcomes. National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper No. w27280. PMC10635474 37946719
  7. Kahn Lisa B. Lange Fabian Wiczer David G. Labor Demand in the Time of Covid-19: Evidence From Vacancy Postings and UI Claims NBER WP 27061 2020 PMC7357497 32834178
  8. Montenovo Laura Jiang Xuan Rojas Felipe L. Schmutte Ian M. Simon Kosali I. Weinberg Bruce A. Wing Coady Determinants of Disparities in Covid-19 Job Losses NBER WP 27132 2020 PMC9177772 35583671

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Couch, K. A., Fairlie, R. W., & Xu, H.
Affiliations
  • University of Connecticut (US)
  • University of California, Santa Cruz (US)
  • Indiana University South Bend (US)
Corresponding author
Fairlie, Robert W.
Venue
Journal of Public Economics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-12
Volume
192
Pages
104287
ISSN
0047-2727 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3086381166
Cited by
282
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 87 · 2021: 70 · 2020: 8
FWCI
45.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Public Economics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, social distancing measures, occupational distribution, industrial distribution, rehiring, racial inequality, job loss

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review