The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A practical 3D-printed soft robotic prosthetic hand with multi-articulating capabilities
Open accessAbstract
Soft robotic hands with monolithic structure have shown great potential to be used as prostheses due to their advantages to yield light weight and compact designs as well as its ease of manufacture. However, existing soft prosthetic hands design were often not geared towards addressing some of the practical requirements highlighted in prosthetics research. The gap between the existing designs and the practical requirements significantly hampers the potential to transfer these designs to real-world applications. This work addressed these requirements with the consideration of the trade-off between practicality and performance. These requirements were achieved through exploiting the monolithic 3D printing of soft materials which incorporates membrane enclosed flexure joints in the finger designs, synergy-based thumb motion and cable-driven actuation system in the proposed hand prosthesis. Our systematic design (tentatively named X-Limb) achieves a weight of 253gr, three grasps types (with capability of individual finger movement), power-grip force of 21.5N, finger flexion speed of 1.3sec, a minimum grasping cycles of 45,000 (while maintaining its original functionality) and a bill of material cost of 200 USD (excluding quick disconnect wrist but without factoring in the cost reduction through mass production). A standard Activities Measure for Upper-Limb Amputees benchmark test was carried out to evaluate the capability of X-Limb in performing grasping task required for activities of daily living. The results show that all the practical design requirements are satisfied, and the proposed soft prosthetic hand is able to perform all the real-world grasping tasks of the benchmark tests, showing great potential in improving life quality of individuals with upper limb loss.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Design, fabrication and control of soft robots
Rus, D., & Tolley, M. T. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14543 · Cited by 5,825
Soft robotics: Technologies and systems pushing the boundaries of robot abilities
Laschi, C., Mazzolai, B., & Cianchetti, M. (2016) · Science Robotics · doi:10.1126/scirobotics.aah3690 · Cited by 1,570 · cited 1×
“Soft robotics [8] is an emerging field which has shown great potential in addressing these issues with current hand prostheses, i.”
BackgroundA novel type of compliant and underactuated robotic hand for dexterous grasping
Deimel, R., & Brock, O. (2016) · The International Journal of Robotics Research · doi:10.1177/0278364915592961 · Cited by 1,084
Results of an internet survey of myoelectric prosthetic hand users
Pylatiuk, C., Schulz, S., & Döderlein, L. (2007) · Prosthetics & Orthotics International · doi:10.1080/03093640601061265 · Cited by 257
Cited by
Flexible Electronics and Devices as Human–Machine Interfaces for Medical Robotics
Heng, W., Solomon, S., & Gao, W. (2022) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.202107902 · Cited by 609
Hegde, C., Su, J., Tan, J. M. R., He, K., Chen, X., & Magdassi, S. (2023) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.3c04089 · Cited by 384
Metadata
- Authors
- Mohammadi, A., Lavranos, J., Zhou, H., Mutlu, R., Alici, G., Tan, Y., Choong, P., & Oetomo, D.
- Venue
- PLOS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2020-05-14
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- e0232766
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3025986385
- Cited by
- 184
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 5.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A practical 3D-printed soft robotic prosthetic hand with multi-articulating capabilities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pone.0232766
- The paper
- Mohammadi, A., Lavranos, J., Zhou, H., Mutlu, R., Alici, G., Tan, Y., Choong, P., & Oetomo, D. (2020). A practical 3D-printed soft robotic prosthetic hand with multi-articulating capabilities. PLOS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232766
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.