Cited by 37Primary Care and Health OutcomesChronic Disease Management StrategiesHospital Admissions and Outcomes

Associations between continuity of primary and specialty physician care and use of hospital-based care among community-dwelling older adults with complex care needs

Open access
Jones, Aaron, Bronskill, Susan E., Seow, Hsien, Junek, Mats, Feeny, David, Costa, Andrew P.·2020·PLoS ONE

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: While research suggests that higher continuity of primary and specialty physician care can improve patient outcomes, their effects have rarely been examined and compared concurrently. We investigated associations between continuity of primary and specialty physician care and emergency department visits and hospital admissions among community-dwelling older adults with complex care needs. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of home care patients in Ontario, Canada, from October 2014 to September 2016. We measured continuity of primary and specialty physician care over the two years prior to a home care assessment and categorized them into low, medium, and high groups using terciles of the distribution. We used Cox regression models to concurrently test the associations between continuity of primary and specialty care and risk of an emergency department visit and hospital admission within six months of assessment, controlling for potential confounders. We examined interactions between continuity of care and count of chronic conditions, count of physician specialties seen, functional impairment, and cognitive impairment. RESULTS: Of 178,686 participants, 49% had an emergency department visit during follow-up and 27% had a hospital admission. High vs. low continuity of primary care was associated with a reduced risk of an emergency department visit (HR = 0.90 (0.89-0.92)) as was continuity of specialty care (HR = 0.93 (0.91-0.95)). High vs. low continuity of primary care was associated also with a reduced risk of a hospital admission (HR = 0.94 (0.92-0.96)) as was continuity of specialty care (HR = 0.92 (0.90-0.94)). The effect of continuity of specialty care was moderately stronger among patients who saw four or more physician specialties. CONCLUSION: Higher continuity of primary physician and specialty physician care had independent, protective effects of similar magnitude against emergency department use and hospital admissions. Improving continuity of specialty care should be a priority alongside improving continuity of primary care in complex, older adult populations with significant specialist use.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0234205

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Relational continuity contributes to a lower risk of Emergency Department presentation and hospital admission.

    “Relational continuity contributes to a lower risk of Emergency Department presentation and hospital admission [46], improvement in the quality of home health care [47], and it is essential to collaboration between formal and informal care providers [48].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [1]National Prevention Council. Healthy Aging in Action: Advancing the National Prevention Strategy. Washington (DC): US Department of Health and Human Services; 2016 Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK538955/ 30896903
  2. [8]Russo CA, Elixhauser A. Hospitalizations in the Elderly Population, 2003: Statistical Brief #6. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) Statistical Briefs. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2006 Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK63501/ 21938846

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jones, A., Bronskill, S. E., Seow, H., Junek, M., Feeny, D., & Costa, A. P.
Affiliations
  • McMaster University (CA)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
Jones, Aaron
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2020-06-19
Volume
15
Issue
6
Pages
e0234205
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3036726826
Cited by
37
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 3
FWCI
5.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Institute of Health Services and Policy Research (148933)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Chronic Disease Management Strategies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
Keywords
continuity of care, primary care, specialist care, emergency department visits, hospitalization, community-dwelling older adults, complex care needs, home care, chronic disease, functional disability, cognitive impairment
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Chronic Disease, Continuity of Patient Care, Emergency Service, Hospital, Female, Home Care Services, Hospitalization, Humans, Male, Ontario, Primary Health Care, Retrospective Studies, Specialization, Cohort Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review