Cited by 516Cancer Genomics and DiagnosticsBRCA gene mutations in cancerGenomics and Rare Diseases

Clinical and analytical validation of FoundationOne Liquid CDx, a novel 324-Gene cfDNA-based comprehensive genomic profiling assay for cancers of solid tumor origin

Open access
Woodhouse, Ryan, Li, Meijuan, Hughes, Jason, Delfosse, David, Skoletsky, Joel, Ma, Pei, Meng, Wei, Dewal, Ninad +11 more·2020·PLOS ONE

Abstract

As availability of precision therapies expands, a well-validated circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA)-based comprehensive genomic profiling assay has the potential to provide considerable value as a complement to tissue-based testing to ensure potentially life-extending therapies are administered to patients most likely to benefit. Additional data supporting the clinical validity of cfDNA-based testing is necessary to inform optimal use of these assays in the clinic. The FoundationOne®Liquid CDx assay is a pan-cancer cfDNA-based comprehensive genomic profiling assay that was recently approved by FDA. Validation studies included >7,500 tests and >30,000 unique variants across >300 genes and >30 cancer types. Clinical validity results across multiple tumor types are presented. Additionally, results demonstrated a 95% limit of detection of 0.40% variant allele fraction for select substitutions and insertions/deletions, 0.37% variant allele fraction for select rearrangements, 21.7% tumor fraction for copy number amplifications, and 30.4% TF for copy number losses. The limit of detection for microsatellite instability and blood tumor mutational burden were also determined. The false positive variant rate was 0.013% (approximately 1 in 8,000). Reproducibility of variant calling was 99.59%. In comparison with an orthogonal method, an overall positive percent agreement of 96.3% and negative percent agreement of >99.9% was observed. These study results demonstrate that FoundationOne Liquid CDx accurately and reproducibly detects the major types of genomic alterations in addition to complex biomarkers such as microsatellite instability, blood tumor mutational burden, and tumor fraction. Critically, clinical validity data is presented across multiple cancer types.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0237802

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Evaluation of Detection Capability for Clinical Labo- ratory Measurement Procedures; Approved Guideline-Second Edition. CLSI document EP17-A2.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Woodhouse, R., Li, M., Hughes, J., Delfosse, D., Skoletsky, J., Ma, P., Meng, W., Dewal, N., Milbury, C., Clark, T., Donahue, A., Stover, D., Kennedy, M., Dacpano-Komansky, J., Burns, C., Vietz, C., Alexander, B., Hegde, P., & Dennis, L.
Affiliations
  • Foundation Medicine (United States) (US)
  • Novartis (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Woodhouse, Ryan
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2020-09-25
Volume
15
Issue
9
Pages
e0237802
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3088519161
Cited by
516
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 82 · 2025: 119 · 2024: 91 · 2023: 99 · 2022: 79 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 2
FWCI
19.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Foundation Medicine
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › BRCA gene mutations in cancer
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
Keywords
FoundationOne Liquid CDx, cell-free DNA, liquid biopsy, comprehensive genomic profiling, solid tumors, clinical validation, variant allele frequency, tumor fraction, microsatellite instability, tumor mutational burden, copy number alterations, precision oncology
MeSH terms
Cell-Free Nucleic Acids, Progression-Free Survival, Biological Assay, Exons, Humans, Mutation, Neoplasms, Reproducibility of Results, Genomics, Limit of Detection, Class I Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinases, ErbB Receptors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review