Cited by 8Vaccine Coverage and HesitancyCervical Cancer and HPV ResearchIntramuscular injections and effects

Structural equation modeling to detect correlates of childhood vaccination: A moderated mediation analysis

Open access
Degarege, Abraham, Krupp, Karl, Srinivas, Vijaya, Ibrahimou, Boubakari, Madhivanan, Purnima·2020·PLOS ONE

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study used a health belief theory derived framework and structural equation model to examine moderators, mediators, and direct and indirect predictors of childhood vaccination. METHODS: A secondary analysis was conducted using data collected from a cross-sectional survey of a random sample of 1599 parents living in urban and rural areas of Mysore district, India. Applying two-stage probability proportionate-to-size sampling, adolescent girls attending 7th through 10th grades in 23 schools were selected to take home a questionnaire to be answered by their parents to primarily assess HPV vaccine intentions. Parents were also asked whether their children had received one dose of Bacillus Calmette-Guérin; three doses of Diphtheria, Pertussis, Tetanus; three doses of oral Polio vaccine; and one dose of Measles vaccine. In addition, parents were asked about their attitudes towards childhood vaccination. RESULTS: Out of the 1599 parents, 52.2% reported that their children had received all the routine vaccines (fully vaccinated); 42.7% reported their children had missed at least one routine vaccine, and 5.2% reported that their children had missed all routine vaccinations. Perceptions about the benefits/facilitators to childhood vaccination significantly predicted the full vaccination rate (standardized regression coefficient (β) = 0.29) directly and mediated the effect of parental education (β = 0.11) and employment (β = -0.06) on the rate of full vaccination. Parental education was significantly associated indirectly with higher rates of full vaccination (β = 0.11). Parental employment was significantly associated indirectly with decreasing rates of full vaccination (β = -0.05). Area of residence moderated the role of religion (β = 0.24) and the 'number of children' in a family (β = 0.33) on parental perceptions about barriers to childhood vaccination. The model to data fit was acceptable (Root Mean Square Error of Approximation = 0.02, 95% CI 0.018 to 0.023; Comparative Fit Index = 0.92; Tucker-Lewis Index = 0.91). CONCLUSIONS: Full vaccination rate was relatively low among children in Mysore, especially among parents who were unsure about the benefits of routine vaccination and those with low educational levels. Interventions increasing awareness of the benefits of childhood vaccination that target rural parents with lower levels of education may help increase the rate of full childhood vaccination in India.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0240749

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 53 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [38]Muthén LK, Muthén BO: Mplus User’s Guide. Eighth Edition (1998–2017). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén and Muthén.
  2. [53]Prislin R, Dyer JA, Blakely CH, et al Immunization status and sociodemographic characteristics: the mediating role of beliefs, attitudes, and perceived control. Am J Public Health. 1998; 88(12): 1821– 1826. 10.2105/ajph.88.12.1821 9842380 PMC1509037 · DOI
  3. [54]Prusty RK, Kumar A. Socioeconomic Dynamics of Gender Disparity in Childhood Immunization in India, 1992–2006. Plos One 2014; 9(8): e104598 10.1371/journal.pone.0104598 25127396 PMC4134226 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Degarege, A., Krupp, K., Srinivas, V., Ibrahimou, B., & Madhivanan, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Nebraska Medical Center (US)
  • University of Arizona (US)
  • Public Health Research Institute Of India (IN)
  • Florida International University (US)
Corresponding author
Degarege, Abraham
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2020-10-15
Volume
15
Issue
10
Pages
e0240749
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3092882583
Cited by
8
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • DigitalCommons@UNMC (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Merck Sharp and Dohme
  • Fogarty International Center (D43 TW010540)
  • National Institute of Health (R15-AI128714)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Intramuscular injections and effects
Keywords
childhood immunization, vaccination coverage, parental attitudes, parental education, parental employment, number of children, urban-rural differences, Mysore district, routine childhood immunization, barriers to vaccination, BCG vaccine, DTP vaccine, polio vaccine, measles vaccine, vaccination intention, rural parents, India
MeSH terms
Latent Class Analysis, Mediation Analysis, Adult, Child, Female, Humans, India, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Models, Theoretical, Vaccination

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review