Cited by 43COVID-19 and healthcare impactsEthics in Clinical ResearchEducation during COVID-19 pandemic

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The impact of COVID-19 on the clinical trial.

Open access

Abstract

The objective of this study was to explore the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 epidemic on ongoing and upcoming drug clinical trials. Qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted with clinical trial staff and clinical trial subjects were surveyed by questionnaire in this study. The results of interviews and questionnaire showed that coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has led to many changes in the implementation of drug clinical trials, including: a variety of meetings being held online webinars using various platforms, telemedicine and follow-up by video, A large number of deviations from protocol and losses of follow-up, delivery of clinical trial drugs by express, additional workload caused by screening for coronavirus, and anxiety of subjects. These results suggest that the coronavirus disease 2019 outbreak has hindered the progress and damaged the quality of clinical trials. The online meeting, remote follow-up, express delivery of drugs and remote monitoring in the epidemic environment can ensure the progress of clinical trials to a certain extent, but they cannot fully guarantee the quality as before.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0251410

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Concerns during the pandemic included worry that visiting health settings could pose a threat to the participant's health from infection of Covid-19.

    “difficulties understanding safety protocols or perceptions that health sites were not stringent enough and [2] worry that visiting health settings could pose a threat to the participant’s health from infection of Covid-19 [6,9].”

    From Legacy lessons from the COVID-19 era to improve trial participation and retention: Views from trial participants, PPIE contributors and trial staff across the NIHR portfolio (2024) · cites this paper as [9]

    The Results questionnaire table (page not provided) reports pandemic-related anxiety and difficulty getting to hospital among trial participants. The Results section on changes in subjects’ emotions links anxiety to transport difficulties and isolation requirements, but neither passage says participants worried that visiting health settings would expose them to COVID-19 infection. (LLM, conf=0.81)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Concerns during the pandemic included difficulties understanding safety protocols or perceptions that health sites were not stringent enough.

    “difficulties understanding safety protocols or perceptions that health sites were not stringent enough and [2] worry that visiting health settings could pose a threat to the participant’s health from infection of Covid-19 [6,9].”

    From Legacy lessons from the COVID-19 era to improve trial participation and retention: Views from trial participants, PPIE contributors and trial staff across the NIHR portfolio (2024) · cites this paper as [9]

    The Results questionnaire reports anxiety and difficulty getting to hospital during COVID-19, but does not identify difficulty understanding safety protocols or perceptions that health sites were insufficiently stringent. The Discussion likewise addresses trial procedures and subject safety without reporting those specific concerns; searches for safety-protocol understanding and perceived site precautions found no supporting passage. Our copy provides no page numbers for these passages. (LLM, conf=0.73)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Carolina Oi, 2020, Community pharmacist in public health emergencies: Quick to action against the corona virus, Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 16, 583

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Chen, Z., Chen, L., & Chen, H.
Affiliations
First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University (CN)
Corresponding author
Chen, Zhimin
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2021-05-11
Volume
16
Issue
5
Pages
e0251410
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3160918054
Cited by
43
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 3
FWCI
3.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Tang Wealth Investment Management Co.
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics in Clinical Research
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education during COVID-19 pandemic
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, clinical trials, clinical drug trials, loss to follow-up, remote follow-up, telemedicine, virtual meetings, clinical trial quality
MeSH terms
COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 Drug Treatment, Adult, Antiviral Agents, Anxiety, Clinical Trials as Topic, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Middle Aged, Patients, Surveys and Questionnaires, Research Personnel, Telemedicine, Young Adult, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review