Cited by 25scientometrics and bibliometrics researchAcademic Writing and PublishingPsychology Research and Bibliometrics

Literary runaway: Increasingly more references cited per academic research article from 1980 to 2019

Open access
Dai, Can, Chen, Quan, Wan, Tao, Liu, Fan, Gong, Yanbing, Wang, Qingfeng·2021·PLOS ONE

Abstract

References are employed in most academic research papers to give credits and to reflect scholarliness. With the upsurge in academic publications in recent decades, we are curious to know how the number of references cited per research article has changed across different disciplines over that time. The results of our study showed significant linear growth in reference density in eight disciplinary categories between 1980 and 2019 indexed in Web of Science. It appears that reference saturation is not yet in sight. Overall, the general increase in the number of publications and the advanced accessibility of the Internet and digitized documents may have promoted the growth in references in certain fields. However, the seemingly runaway tendency should be well appreciated and objectively assessed. We suggest that authors focus on their research itself rather than on political considerations during the process of writing, especially the selection of important references to cite.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0255849

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 24 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [13]Fox J, Weisberg S. An {R} Companion to Applied Regression, Third Edition. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: Sage; 2019.
  2. [18]Lemon J. plotrix: A package in the red light district of R. R-News. 2006; 6: 8– 12.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dai, C., Chen, Q., Wan, T., Liu, F., Gong, Y., & Wang, Q.
Affiliations
  • Hubei University (CN)
  • Fairy Lake Botanical Garden (CN)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • Wuhan University (CN)
Corresponding author
Wang, Qingfeng
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2021-08-06
Volume
16
Issue
8
Pages
e0255849
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3189135819
Cited by
21
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3
FWCI
1.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Greater South Information System
Funders
  • Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province (2019CFA066)
  • National Science & Technology Fundamental Resources Investigation Program of China (2019FY101800)
  • Innovation of Science and Technology Commission of Shenzhen (JSGG20140515164852417, JCYJ201206151530054)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Academic Writing and Publishing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
Keywords
citation practices, reference density, disciplinary differences, Web of Science, scientific publication trends, scholarly communication
MeSH terms
Humans, Publications, Publishing, Research, Writing, Bibliometrics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review