Cited by 6

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The production technology of mineral soda alumina glass: A perspective from microstructural analysis of glass beads in Iron Age Taiwan

Wang, Kuan-Wen, Iizuka, Yoshiyuki, Jackson, Caroline·2022·PLOS ONE

Abstract

Mineral soda alumina (m-Na-Al) glass is a common glass production group found around the Indo-Pacific region. In Iron Age Taiwan, its presence dates back to the early 1 st millennium AD. This research discusses m-Na-Al glass beads excavated from Iron Age sites in Taiwan. No production sites for m-Na-Al have been found, but microstructural analysis suggests m-Na-Al glass appears to originate around South Asia and is exchanged widely. SEM-EDS and EPMA were used to analyse red, orange, yellow, green and blue m-Na-Al glass. The microstructure of the glass shows the presence of plagioclase and alkali feldspar relics in the glass, suggesting a low manufacturing temperature. Copper-based colourants are identified in red, orange, blue and green glass, while lead tin oxide is used in yellow and green glass. It appears that various types of copper-containing raw materials were procured by craftspeople, and a self-reduction process for producing red and orange glass is tentatively proposed. Additionally, the microstructure of yellow glass reveals different colouring paths were used. These results increase our understanding of the selection of raw materials, and provide an impetus for further research on the cross craft interaction between glass and copper production.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0263986

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 44

  1. RH Brill, 1987, Archaeometry of Glass Proceedings of the XIV International Congress on Glass, New Delhi, 1986, 1
  2. L Dussubieux, 2010, Mineral soda alumina glass: occurrence and meaning, J Archaeol Sci, 37, 1646, 10.1016/j.jas.2010.01.025 · DOI · Paper page
  3. DN Waida, 1926, Geology of India for Students
  4. HC Bhardwaj, 1979, Aspects of Ancient Indian Technology
  5. AK Kanungo, 2010, The radiocarbon chronology of Kopia, an early glass manufacturing centre in India, Archaeometry, 52, 899, 10.1111/j.1475-4754.2009.00497.x · DOI
  6. L Dussubieux, 2018, Glass ornament production and trade polities in the Upper-Thai Peninsula during the Early Iron Age, Archaeol Res Asia, 13, 25, 10.1016/j.ara.2017.08.001 · DOI
  7. AK Carter, 2016, The Production and Exchange of Glass and Stone Beads in Southeast Asia from 500 BCE to the early second millennium CE: An assessment of the work of Peter Francis in light of recent research, Archaeol Res Asia, 6, 16, 10.1016/j.ara.2016.02.004 · DOI
  8. K-W Wang, 2018, Beads in Iron-Age and Early-Modern Taiwan: an introduction, BEADS J Soc Bead Res, 30, 16
  9. K-W Wang, 2022, Social and economic interaction reflected by early Iron Age glass beads from selected sites of Taiwan. In: Maritime Exchange and Localization across the South China Sea, 500 BC- AD 500, Forthcoming
  10. AK Carter, 2015, Beads, exchange networks and emerging complexity: a case study from Cambodia and Thailand (500 BCE–CE 500), Cambridge Archaeol J, 25, 733, 10.1017/S0959774315000207 · DOI
  11. H-C Hung, 2016, Taiwan’s Early Metal Age and Southeast Asian trading systems, Antiquity, 90, 1537, 10.15184/aqy.2016.184 · DOI · Paper page
  12. B Bellina, 2019, Southeast Asian early Maritime Silk Road trading polities’ hinterland and the sea-nomads of the Isthmus of Kra, J Anthropol Archaeol, 54, 102, 10.1016/j.jaa.2019.02.005 · DOI
  13. Dussubieux L. L’apport de l’blation laser couplée à l’ICP-MS à la caractérisation des verres: application à l’étude du verre archéologique de l’Océan Indien [dissertation]. Orléans: Université d’Orléans; 2001.
  14. L Dussubieux, 2010, 50 Years of Archaeology in Southeast Asia: Essays in Honour of Ian Glover, 246
  15. T Sode, 2001, Traditional raw glass production in northern India: the final stage of an ancient technology, J Glass Stud, 43, 155
  16. SA Abraham, 2016, Glass beads and glass production in early South India: Contextualizing Indo-Pacific bead manufacture, Archaeol Res Asia, 6, 4, 10.1016/j.ara.2016.02.003 · DOI
  17. K-W Wang, 2019, The anomaly of glass beads and glass beadmaking waste at Jiuxianglan, Taiwan, Archaeol Anthropol Sci, 11, 1391, 10.1007/s12520-017-0593-3 · DOI
  18. P. Francis, 1991, Beadmaking at Arikamedu and beyond, World Archaeol, 23, 28, 10.1080/00438243.1991.9980157 · DOI · Paper page
  19. P. Francis, 1990, Glass beads in Asia: Part II. Indo-Pacific Beads, Asian Perspect, 29, 1
  20. AK Kanungo, 2016, Mapping the Indo-Pacific Beads vis-a-vis Papanaidupet
  21. GF Zellmer, 2021, Beyond crystal mushes: evidence for uptake of high-T pyroxene antecrysts from mid- to upper crustal andesites into tephras from the Central Plateau, New Zealand, New Zeal J Geol Geophys, 64, 443, 10.1080/00288306.2020.1848883 · DOI
  22. K-W Wang, 2021, Glass beads from Guishan in Iron Age Taiwan: Inter-regional bead exchange between Taiwan, Southeast Asia and beyond, J Archaeol Sci Reports, 35, 102737, 10.1016/j.jasrep.2020.102737 · DOI
  23. EM Levin, 1959, Phase Diagrams for Ceramists: Part II
  24. AA Ahmed, 1981, Effect of heat-treatment on the crystallization of cuprous-oxide in glass, Glas Technol, 22, 24
  25. DJ Barber, 2009, From Mine to Microscope Advances in the Study of Ancient Technology, 115
  26. A Durán, 1984, Study of the colouring process in copper ruby glasses by optical and EPR spectroscopy, J Mater Sci, 19, 1468, 10.1007/BF00563041 · DOI
  27. S Ishida, 1987, Role of Sn2+ in development of red color during reheating of copper glass, J Non Cryst Solids, 95, 793, 10.1016/S0022-3093(87)80683-X · DOI
  28. C. Capatina, 2005, study of copper ruby glass, TheCeramics, 49, 283
  29. T Bring, 2007, Colour development in copper ruby alkali silicate glasses. Part 1. The impact of tin (II) oxide, time and temperature, Glas Technol Eur J Glas Sci Technol Part A, 48, 101
  30. IC Freestone, 1987, Early Vitreous Materials, Occasional Paper No56, 173
  31. A. Bennett, 1989, The Contribution of Metallurgical Studies to South-East Asian Archaeology, World Archaeol, 20, 329, 10.1080/00438243.1989.9980077 · DOI
  32. M Cadet, 2021, Late prehistoric copper smelting in the Lao PDR: Experimental reconstruction based on the Vilabouly Complex evidence, J Archaeol Sci Reports, 37, 102932, 10.1016/j.jasrep.2021.102932 · DOI
  33. EG Hamilton, 2018, Ban Chiang, Northeast Thailand, Volume 2A. Background to the Study of the Metal Remains
  34. Peake JRN, Freestone IC. Cross-craft interactions between metal and glass working: slag additions to early Anglo-Saxon red glass. Vol. 8422, Proceedings of SPIE Integrated Approaches to the Study of Historical Glass. Brussels, Belgium: SPIE; 2012. p. 842204–12. · DOI
  35. A Hauptmann, 2003, Man and Mining—Mensch und Bergbau, 197
  36. H. Kühn, 1968, Lead-Tin Yellow, Stud Conserv, 13, 7
  37. M Heck, 2003, The production of lead–tin yellow at Merovingian Schleitheim (Switzerland), Archaeometry, 45, 33, 10.1111/1475-4754.00095 · DOI
  38. P. Saha, 1961, The system NaAlSiO4 (Nepheline)-NaAlSi3O8 (Albite)-H2O*, Am Mineral, 46, 859
  39. M Dumańska-Słowik, 2015, The transformation of nepheline and albite into sodalite in pegmatitic mariupolite of the Oktiabrski Massif (SE Ukraine), Spectrochim Acta Part A Mol Biomol Spectrosc, 150, 837, 10.1016/j.saa.2015.06.039 · DOI
  40. M Tite, 2008, Discovery, production and use of tin-based opacifiers in glasses, enamels and glazes from the late Iron Age onwards: a reassessment, Archaeometry, 50, 67, 10.1111/j.1475-4754.2007.00339.x · DOI
  41. E. Peltenburg, 1987, Early Vitreous Materials, 5
  42. Th Rehren, 1998, The Prehistory and History of Glassmaking Technology, 227
  43. P Fredrickx, 2004, EPMA and μ-SRXRF analysis and TEM-based microstructure characterization of a set of Roman glass fragments, X-Ray Spectrom, 33, 326, 10.1002/xrs.734 · DOI
  44. IC Freestone, 2003, Through a Glass Brightly: Studies in Byzantine and Medieval Art and Archaeology presented to David Buckton, 142

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Wang, K.-W., Iizuka, Y., & Jackson, C.
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2022-02-15
Volume
17
Issue
2
Pages
e0263986
ISSN
1932-6203
Cited by
6
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review