Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 284

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Clinical findings, viral load, and outcomes of COVID-19: Comparison of patients with negative and positive initial chest computed tomography

Open access
Kim, Cherry, Kim, Ji-Yeon, Lee, Eun Joo, Kang, Yu Min, Song, Kyoung-Ho, Kim, Eu Suk, Kim, Eun Jin, Sheen, Seungsoo, Lee, Yoo Ra, Kang, BeoDeul, Kim, Joon Ho, Woo, Myoung Lyeol, Park, Chul Hee, Kwon, Soohoon, Choo, Eun Ju, Kim, Tark, Kim, Donghoon, Oh, Hong Sang, Choi, Won Suk·2022·PLOS ONE

Abstract

Reports detailing the clinical characteristics, viral load, and outcomes of patients with normal initial chest CT findings are lacking. We sought to compare the differences in clinical findings, viral loads, and outcomes between patients with confirmed COVID-19 who initially tested negative on chest CT (CT negative) with patients who tested initially positive on chest CT (CT positive). The clinical data, viral loads, and outcomes of initial CT-positive and CT-negative patients examined between January 2020 and April 2020 were retrospectively compared. The efficacy of viral load (cyclic threshold value [Ct value]) in predicting pneumonia was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and area under the curve (AUC). In total, 128 patients underwent initial chest CT (mean age, 54.3 ± 19.0 years, 50% male). Of those, 36 were initially CT negative, and 92 were CT positive. The CT-positive patients were significantly older (P < .001) than the CT-negative patients. Only age was significantly associated with the initial presence of pneumonia (odds ratio, 1.060; confidence interval (CI), 1.020-1-102; P = .003). In addition, age (OR, 1.062; CI, 1.014–1.112; P = .011), fever at diagnosis (OR, 6.689; CI, 1.715–26.096; P = .006), and CRP level (OR, 1.393; CI, 1.150–1.687; P = .001) were significantly associated with the need for O 2 therapy. Viral load was significantly higher in the CT-positive group than in the CT-negative group (P = .017). The cutoff Ct value for predicting the presence of pneumonia was 27.71. Outcomes including the mean hospital stay, intensive care unit admission, and O 2 therapy were significantly worse in the CT-positive group than in the CT-negative group (all P < .05). In conclusion, initially CT-negative patients showed better outcomes than initially CT-positive patients. Age was significantly associated with the initial presence of pneumonia, and viral load may help in predicting the initial presence of pneumonia.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0264711

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 15 references

Cited by

See all 284

Metadata

Authors
Kim, C., Kim, J.-Y., Lee, E. J., Kang, Y. M., Song, K.-H., Kim, E. S., Kim, E. J., Sheen, S., Lee, Y. R., Kang, B., Kim, J. H., Woo, M. L., Park, C. H., Kwon, S., Choo, E. J., Kim, T., Kim, D., Oh, H. S., & Choi, W. S.
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2022-03-03
Volume
17
Issue
3
Pages
e0264711
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W35239734
Cited by
284
References
15
FWCI
3.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinical findings, viral load, and outcomes of COVID-19: Comparison of patients with negative and positive initial chest computed tomography. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pone.0264711
The paper
Kim, C., Kim, J.-Y., Lee, E. J., Kang, Y. M., Song, K.-H., Kim, E. S., Kim, E. J., Sheen, S., Lee, Y. R., Kang, B., Kim, J. H., Woo, M. L., Park, C. H., Kwon, S., Choo, E. J., Kim, T., Kim, D., Oh, H. S., & Choi, W. S. (2022). Clinical findings, viral load, and outcomes of COVID-19: Comparison of patients with negative and positive initial chest computed tomography. PLOS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0264711

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.