Cited by 186Climate Change Policy and EconomicsEnergy, Environment, Economic GrowthIntegrated Energy Systems Optimization

A global stocktake of the Paris pledges: Implications for energy systems and economy

Open access
Vandyck, Toon, Keramidas, Kimon, Saveyn, Bert, Kitous, Alban, Vrontisi, Zoi·2016·Global Environmental Change

Abstract

The United Nations-led international climate change negotiations in Paris in December 2015 (COP21) trigger and enhance climate action across the globe. This paper presents a model-based assessment of the Paris Agreement. In particular, we assess the mitigation policies implied by the Intended Nationally Determined Contributions (INDCs) put forward in the run-up to COP21 by individual member states and a policy that is likely to limit global warming to 2 °C above pre-industrial levels. We combine a technology-rich bottom-up energy system model with an economy-wide top-down CGE model to analyse the impact on greenhouse gas emissions, energy demand and supply, and the wider economic effects, including the implications for trade flows and employment levels. In addition, we illustrate how the gap between the Paris mitigation pledges and a pathway that is likely to restrict global warming to 2 °C can be bridged. Results indicate that energy demand reduction and a decarbonisation of the power sector are important contributors to overall emission reductions up to 2050. Further, the analysis shows that the Paris pledges lead to relatively small losses in GDP, indicating that global action to cut emissions is consistent with robust economic growth. The results for employment indicate a potential transition of jobs from energy-intensive to low-carbon, service oriented sectors.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.08.006

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous studies have shown that taken together, NDCs and national policies fall significantly short of the overall ambition of the Paris Agreement.

    “Previous studies have highlighted that taken together, the NDCs and national policies fall significantly short of the overall ambition of the Paris Agreement2–4.”
  • For national policies, greenhouse gas emissions by 2030 would be somewhat higher, and for well below 2 °C scenarios lower, than earlier studies indicated.

    “The results from this study show that, for national policies, greenhouse gas emissions by 2030 would be somewhat higher and for well below 2 °C scenarios lower than earlier studies indicated2,4,42”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Perry, M., Abrell, J., Ciscar, J.C., Pycroft, J., Saveyn, B. (Eds.), JRC Scientific and Technical Reports .
  2. European Commission, 2012. Review of Regulation (EC) No 842/2006 on certain fluorinated greenhouse gases, Commission Staff Working Document. Impact Assessment (COM(2012) 643 final, SWD(2012) 364).
  3. Marcucci, A., Kypreos, S., Panos, E., 2016. The road to achieving equitable Paris targets: energy transition and burden sharing. European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists (EAERE) Conference Paper .

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vandyck, T., Keramidas, K., Saveyn, B., Kitous, A., & Vrontisi, Z.
Affiliations
  • Joint Research Center (ES)
  • National Technical University of Athens (GR)
Corresponding author
Vandyck, Toon
Venue
Global Environmental Change
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-11
Volume
41
Pages
46-63
ISSN
0959-3780 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2518870448
Cited by
186
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 12
FWCI
40.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Global Environmental Change (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Joint Research Centre (European Commission) (submittedVersion)
Funders
European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Integrated Energy Systems Optimization
Keywords
Paris Agreement, Intended Nationally Determined Contributions, climate change mitigation, 2°C target, greenhouse gas emissions, energy system modelling, computable general equilibrium model, energy demand, power sector decarbonization, economic impacts of climate policy, GDP loss, employment transitions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review