Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 60

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Stability of circulating microRNAs in serum

Kupec, Tomas, Bleilevens, Andreas, Iborra, Séverine, Najjari, Laila, Wittenborn, Julia, Maurer, Jochen, Stickeler, Elmar·2022·PLOS ONE

Abstract

There is a strong body of evidence by several translational studies which demonstrate the potential of circulating miRNAs as a potential biomarker in oncology. However, recent reports documented varying stability of these small RNA molecules in serum samples. The aim of our pilot study was to evaluate the stability of miRNAs in serum in relation to food intake and sample storage. Serum miRNA expression levels of 16 different miRNAs from 8 healthy volunteers were quantified by real-time PCR. 4 samples from each donor were analysed—2 samples (fasting, in the morning and after food intake, at noon) were analysed within 24h and 2 samples (fasting and after food intake, at noon) were stored at -80°C for 14 days and subsequently analysed. Student´s t-test was used to determine significant differences. The detectability of the distinct miRNA as a surrogate for the stability of these small RNA molecules was slightly altered by the storage conditions, but only a miRNA 22-3p, out of the analysed 16 miRNAs, shows significant lower dCq expression (3.821 vs. 4.530; p<0,01) by qPCR dependent on storage conditions (-80°C vs. 4°C). However, miRNA levels were not affected by food intake. The difference between samples taken in the morning (fasting) and at noon (after a normal meal) did not show any significant differences. MiRNAs can be considered to be a relatively stable tool in laboratory diagnostics, but clearly every new assay needs thorough evaluation. The stability of miRNAs documented here in healthy volunteers shows their potential in the search for innovative biomarkers in oncology.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0268958

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Fig 1 Fresh morning versus fresh noon. Box plots of dCq values of serum MiRNA samples (n = 8) taken in the morning under fasting condition compared to samples (n = 8) taken at noon after normal eating and drinking. All samples were analyzed within 24 hours. The differences in the expression were not significant.
Fig 1 Fresh morning versus fresh noon. Box plots of dCq values of serum MiRNA samples (n = 8) taken in the morning under fasting condition compared to samples (n = 8) taken at noon after normal eating and drinking. All samples were analyzed within 24 hours. The differences in the expression were not significant.CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig 2 -80°C morning versus -80°C noon. Box plots of dCq values of serum MiRNA samples (n = 8) taken in the morning under fasting condition compared to samples (n = 8) taken at noon after normal eating and drinking. All samples were stored 14 days by -80°C and then analyzed. The differences in the expression were not significant.
Fig 2 -80°C morning versus -80°C noon. Box plots of dCq values of serum MiRNA samples (n = 8) taken in the morning under fasting condition compared to samples (n = 8) taken at noon after normal eating and drinking. All samples were stored 14 days by -80°C and then analyzed. The differences in the expression were not significant.CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig 3 Fresh morning versus -80°C morning. Box plots of dCq values of serum MiRNA samples taken at fasting condition compares the analysis within 24 hours (n = 8) and the analysis of samples (n = 8) after 14 days storage at -80°C. The expression of miRNAs 194-5p, 27b-3p, 151a-5p, 100-5p, 22-3p was lower after being stored at -80° for 14 days. There were no significant differences (p<0,01).
Fig 3 Fresh morning versus -80°C morning. Box plots of dCq values of serum MiRNA samples taken at fasting condition compares the analysis within 24 hours (n = 8) and the analysis of samples (n = 8) after 14 days storage at -80°C. The expression of miRNAs 194-5p, 27b-3p, 151a-5p, 100-5p, 22-3p was lower after being stored at -80° for 14 days. There were no significant differences (p<0,01).CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig 4 Fresh noon versus -80°C noon. Box plots of dCq values of serum MiRNA samples taken in the afternoon compares the analysis of samples (n = 8) within 24 hours and the analysis of samples (n = 8) after 14 days at -80°C. The expression of MiRNAs 28-5p, 194-5p, 151a-3p, 22-3p was lower after being stored at -80° for 14 days. The expression of miRNA 22-3p was significantly lower (p<0,01).
Fig 4 Fresh noon versus -80°C noon. Box plots of dCq values of serum MiRNA samples taken in the afternoon compares the analysis of samples (n = 8) within 24 hours and the analysis of samples (n = 8) after 14 days at -80°C. The expression of MiRNAs 28-5p, 194-5p, 151a-3p, 22-3p was lower after being stored at -80° for 14 days. The expression of miRNA 22-3p was significantly lower (p<0,01).CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig 5 dCq differences. The dCq difference of all miRNA samples taken either in the morning under fasting condition and in the afternoon after normal eating and drinking. The dCq difference of the samples analyzed within 24h, as well as of the samples which were analyzed after 14 days storage at -80°C as shown. Overall, there are small differences under 1 dCq. Just the miRNA 193b-3p shows differences in all samples more than 1 dCq and the sample of the difference -80°C morning/ -80°C noon by miRNA 100-5p shows the difference more than 1dCq.
Fig 5 dCq differences. The dCq difference of all miRNA samples taken either in the morning under fasting condition and in the afternoon after normal eating and drinking. The dCq difference of the samples analyzed within 24h, as well as of the samples which were analyzed after 14 days storage at -80°C as shown. Overall, there are small differences under 1 dCq. Just the miRNA 193b-3p shows differences in all samples more than 1 dCq and the sample of the difference -80°C morning/ -80°C noon by miRNA 100-5p shows the difference more than 1dCq.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. J. Li, 2020, miR-28-3p promotes the malignant biological behaviors of triple negative breast cancer MDA-MB-468 cells via inhibiting BIN1, Chinese Journal of Cancer Biotherapy, 27, 55

Cited by

See all 60

Metadata

Authors
Kupec, T., Bleilevens, A., Iborra, S., Najjari, L., Wittenborn, J., Maurer, J., & Stickeler, E.
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2022-08-31
Volume
17
Issue
8
Pages
e0268958
ISSN
1932-6203
Cited by
60
References
22
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.