Cited by 4

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A novel quantitative computer-assisted drug-induced liver injury causality assessment tool (DILI-CAT)

Tillmann, Hans L., Suzuki, Ayako, Merz, Michael, Hermann, Richard, Rockey, Don C.·2022·PLOS ONE

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Background and aims: We hypothesized that a drug’s clinical signature (or phenotype) of liver injury can be assessed and used to quantitatively develop a computer-assisted DILI causality assessment-tool (DILI-CAT). Therefore, we evaluated drug-specific DILI-phenotypes for amoxicillin-clavulanate (AMX/CLA), cefazolin, cyproterone, and Polygonum multiflorum using data from published case series, to develop DILI-CAT scores for each drug. Methods: Drug specific phenotypes were made up of the following three clinical features: (1) latency, (2) R-value, and (3) AST/ALT ratio. A point allocation system was developed with points allocated depending on the variance from the norm (or “core”) for the 3 variables in published datasets. Results: The four drugs had significantly different phenotypes based on latency, R-value, and AST/ALT ratio. The median cyproterone latency was 150 days versus < 43 days for the other three drugs (median: 26 for AMX/CLA, 20 for cefazolin, and 20 for Polygonum multiflorum ; p<0.001). The R-value for the four drugs was also significantly different among drugs (cyproterone [median 12.4] and Polygonum multiflorum [median 10.9]) from AMX/CLA [median 1.44] and cefazolin [median 1.57; p<0.001]). DILI-CAT scores effectively separated cyproterone and Polygonum multiflorum from AMX/CLA and cefazolin, respectively (p<0.001). As expected, because of phenotypic overlap, AMX/CLA and cefazolin could not be well differentiated. Conclusions: DILI-CAT is a data-driven, diagnostic tool built to define drug-specific phenotypes for DILI adjudication. The data provide proof of principle that a drug-specific, data-driven causality assessment tool can be developed for different drugs and raise the possibility that such a process could enhance causality assessment methods.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0271304

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For DILI-CAT, phenotypic overlap between drugs precluded differentiation, as illustrated by amoxicillin-clavulanate and cefazolin.

    “However, phenotypic overlap between drugs precluded differentiation, as illustrated by amoxicillin‐clavulanate and cefazolin.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. R A WILKE, 2007, Identifying genetic risk factors for serious adverse drug reactions: current progress and challenges, Nat Rev Drug Discov, 6, 904, 10.1038/nrd2423 · DOI
  2. M ROBLES-DIAZ, 2014, Use of Hy’s law and a new composite algorithm to predict acute liver failure in patients with drug-induced liver injury, Gastroenterology, 147, 10.1053/j.gastro.2014.03.050 · DOI · Paper page
  3. N CHALASANI, 2015, Features and Outcomes of 889 Patients with Drug-induced Liver Injury: The DILIN Prospective Study, Gastroenterology
  4. R J FONTANA, 2014, Idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality within 6 months from onset, Gastroenterology, 147, 10.1053/j.gastro.2014.03.045 · DOI · Paper page
  5. I J ONAKPOYA, 2016, Post-marketing withdrawal of 462 medicinal products because of adverse drug reactions: a systematic review of the world literature, BMC Med, 14, 10, 10.1186/s12916-016-0553-2 · DOI
  6. I J ONAKPOYA, 2019, Correction to: Post-marketing withdrawal of 462 medicinal products because of adverse drug reactions: a systematic review of the world literature, BMC Med, 17, 56, 10.1186/s12916-019-1294-9 · DOI
  7. H NARJES, 2000, Effect of hospitalisation on liver enzymes in healthy subjects, Eur J Clin Pharmacol, 56, 329, 10.1007/s002280000142 · DOI
  8. P ROSENZWEIG, 1999, Transaminase elevation on placebo during phase I trials: prevalence and significance, Br J Clin Pharmacol, 48, 19, 10.1046/j.1365-2125.1999.00952.x · DOI
  9. I J DOUGLAS, 2013, Orlistat and the risk of acute liver injury: self controlled case series study in UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink, BMJ, 346, f1936, 10.1136/bmj.f1936 · DOI · Paper page
  10. G DANAN, 1993, Causality assessment of adverse reactions to drugs—I. A novel method based on the conclusions of international consensus meetings: application to drug-induced liver injuries, J Clin Epidemiol, 46, 1323, 10.1016/0895-4356(93)90101-6 · DOI · Paper page
  11. V A MARIA, 1997, Development and validation of a clinical scale for the diagnosis of drug-induced hepatitis, Hepatology, 26, 664, 10.1002/hep.510260319 · DOI · Paper page
  12. H TAKIKAWA, 2003, Assessment of 287 Japanese cases of drug induced liver injury by the diagnostic scale of the International Consensus Meeting, Hepatol Res, 27, 192, 10.1016/S1386-6346(03)00232-8 · DOI · Paper page
  13. D C ROCKEY, 2010, Causality assessment in drug-induced liver injury using a structured expert opinion process: comparison to the Roussel-Uclaf causality assessment method, Hepatology, 51, 2117, 10.1002/hep.23577 · DOI · Paper page
  14. H L TILLMANN, 2020, Signatures in drug-induced liver injury, Curr Opin Gastroenterol, 36, 199, 10.1097/MOG.0000000000000636 · DOI
  15. R P HERMANN, 2022, A novel phenotype-based drug-induced liver injury causality assessment tool (DILI-CAT) allows for signal confirmation in early drug development, Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 55, 1028, 10.1111/apt.16836 · DOI
  16. F BESSONE, 2016, Cyproterone acetate induces a wide spectrum of acute liver damage including corticosteroid-responsive hepatitis: report of 22 cases, Liver Int, 36, 302, 10.1111/liv.12899 · DOI
  17. M L HAUTEKEETE, 1999, HLA association of amoxicillin-clavulanate—induced hepatitis, Gastroenterology, 117, 1181, 10.1016/S0016-5085(99)70404-X · DOI
  18. S A ALQAHTANI, 2014, Identification and Characterization of Cefazolin-induced Liver Injury, Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol
  19. H DONG, 2014, Eighteen cases of liver injury following ingestion of Polygonum multiflorum, Complement Ther Med, 22, 70, 10.1016/j.ctim.2013.12.008 · DOI · Paper page
  20. H L TILLMANN, 2019, Tools for causality assessment in drug-induced liver disease, Curr Opin Gastroenterol, 35, 183, 10.1097/MOG.0000000000000526 · DOI
  21. E S BJORNSSON, 2016, Categorization of drugs implicated in causing liver injury: Critical assessment based on published case reports, Hepatology, 63, 590, 10.1002/hep.28323 · DOI · Paper page
  22. N TALAAT, 2019, Injury pattern recognition to discriminate competing causes of liver injury, Liver Int, 39, 821, 10.1111/liv.14056 · DOI
  23. M CHEN, 2013, High lipophilicity and high daily dose of oral medications are associated with significant risk for drug-induced liver injury, Hepatology, 58, 388, 10.1002/hep.26208 · DOI · Paper page
  24. J WHRITENOUR, 2017, Development of a modified lymphocyte transformation test for diagnosing drug-induced liver injury associated with an adaptive immune response, J Immunotoxicol, 14, 31, 10.1080/1547691X.2016.1254305 · DOI · Paper page
  25. A BENESIC, 2016, Monocyte-derived hepatocyte-like cells for causality assessment of idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury, Gut, 65, 1555, 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-309528 · DOI · Paper page
  26. A BENESIC, 2018, Development and Validation of a Test to Identify Drugs That Cause Idiosyncratic Drug-Induced Liver Injury, Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 16, 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.04.049 · DOI · Paper page
  27. F GERHARDT, 2019, Iberogast-Induced Acute Liver Failure-Reexposure and In Vitro Assay Support Causality, Am J Gastroenterol, 114, 1358, 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000300 · DOI
  28. S WEBER, 2021, Monocyte-Derived Hepatocyte-Like Cell Test: A Novel Tool for in vitro Identification of Drug-Induced Liver Injury in Patients with Herbal or Dietary Supplements, Digestion, 102, 650, 10.1159/000509391 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Tillmann, H. L., Suzuki, A., Merz, M., Hermann, R., & Rockey, D. C.
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2022-09-29
Volume
17
Issue
9
Pages
e0271304
ISSN
1932-6203
Cited by
4
References
1
Language
en
Funders
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (P30 DK123704., P20 GM 130457)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review