Cited by 27Abdominal vascular conditions and treatmentsSepsis Diagnosis and TreatmentAbdominal Surgery and Complications

Non-occlusive mesenteric ischemia in critically ill patients

Open access
Yu, Byunghyuk, Ko, Ryoung-Eun, Yoo, Keesang, Gil, Eunmi, Choi, Kyoung-Jin, Park, Chi-Min·2022·PLOS ONE

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Non-occlusive mesenteric ischemia (NOMI) is a life-threatening acute condition that has an overall in-hospital mortality rate of up to 75%. Critically ill patients are often admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) due to shock, and these patients are frequently at risk of developing NOMI. The objective of this study was to determine the clinical features of critically ill patients with NOMI and evaluate the risk factors for in-hospital mortality among these patients. METHODS: We reviewed the electronic medical records of 7,346 patients who underwent abdominal contrast-enhanced computed tomography during their ICU stay at Samsung Medical Center (Seoul, Korea) between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2019. After reviewing each patient's computed tomography (CT) scans, 60 patients were diagnosed with NOMI and included in this analysis. The patients were divided into survivor (n = 23) and non-survivor (n = 37) groups according to the in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: The overall sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score for the included patients upon admission to the ICU was 8.6 ± 3.1, and medical ICU admissions were most common (66.7%) among the patients. The SOFA score upon admission to the ICU was higher for the non-survivors than for the survivors (9.4 vs. 7.4; p = 0.017). Non-survivors were more often observed in the medical ICU admissions (39.1% vs. 83.8%) than in the surgical ICU admissions (47.8% vs. 10.8%) or the cardiac ICU admissions (13.0% vs. 5.4%). Laboratory test results, abdominal CT findings, and the use of vasopressors and inotropes did not differ between the two groups. In a multivariable analysis, SOFA scores >8 upon admission to the ICU (odds ratio [OR] 4.51; 95% 1.12-18.13; p = 0.034), patients admitted to the ICU with medical problems (OR 7.99; 95% 1.73-36.94; p = 0.008), and abdominal pain (OR 4.26; 95% 1.05-17.35; p = 0.043) were significant prognostic predictors for in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The SOFA score >8 upon admission to the ICU, admission to the ICU for medical problems, and abdominal pain at diagnosis are associated with increased mortality among patients with NOMI.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0279196

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • NOMI is a result of hypoperfusion (from sepsis, shock, cardiac failure) and use of vasoconstrictors.

    “NOMI is a result of hypoperfusion (from sepsis, shock, cardiac failure) and use of vasoconstrictors (Fig. 1c).”

    From Acute mesenteric ischaemia (2023) · cites this paper as [13]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) identifies septic and cardiogenic shock as risk factors for NOMI. The Discussion (page unavailable) says reports suggest an association between vasopressors and NOMI development and describes vasoconstriction reducing intestinal blood flow. The claim presents these factors as established causes and extends septic shock to sepsis generally; the paper does not make those stronger claims. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Non-occlusive mesenteric ischaemia typically occurs in patients in the ICU or cardiac care unit.

    “Patients with non-occlusive mesenteric ischaemia (NOMI) typically come from the ICU or cardiac care unit11–13.”

    From Acute mesenteric ischaemia (2023) · cites this paper as [13]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yu, B., Ko, R.-E., Yoo, K., Gil, E., Choi, K.-J., & Park, C.-M.
Affiliations
Samsung Medical Center (KR)
Corresponding author
Park, Chi-Min
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2022-12-19
Volume
17
Issue
12
Pages
e0279196
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4311912035
Cited by
27
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 7
FWCI
5.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Abdominal vascular conditions and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Abdominal Surgery and Complications
Keywords
nonocclusive mesenteric ischemia, critically ill patients, in-hospital mortality, risk factors, SOFA score, abdominal pain, shock, intensive care unit admission, medical ICU, contrast-enhanced abdominal CT, mortality prediction model, prognostic model, clinical features, sepsis, multiple organ failure, vasopressors, inotropic agents
MeSH terms
Hospitalization, Humans, Intensive Care Units, Prognosis, Retrospective Studies, Critical Illness, Hospital Mortality, Organ Dysfunction Scores, Mesenteric Ischemia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review