Cited by 8Hereditary Neurological DisordersProtein Structure and DynamicsPeripheral Neuropathies and Disorders

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Conserved intramolecular networks in GDAP1 are closely connected to CMT-linked mutations and protein stability

Open access

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT) is the most common inherited peripheral polyneuropathy in humans, and its subtypes are linked to mutations in dozens of different genes, including the gene coding for ganglioside-induced differentiation-associated protein 1 (GDAP1). The main GDAP1-linked CMT subtypes are the demyelinating CMT4A and the axonal CMT2K. Over a hundred different missense CMT mutations in the GDAP1 gene have been reported. However, despite implications for mitochondrial fission and fusion, cytoskeletal interactions, and response to reactive oxygen species, the etiology of GDAP1-linked CMT is poorly understood at the protein level. Based on earlier structural data, CMT-linked mutations could affect intramolecular interaction networks within the GDAP1 protein. We carried out structural and biophysical analyses on several CMT-linked GDAP1 protein variants and describe new crystal structures of the autosomal recessive R120Q and the autosomal dominant A247V and R282H GDAP1 variants. These mutations reside in the structurally central helices ⍺3, ⍺7, and ⍺8. In addition, solution properties of the CMT mutants R161H, H256R, R310Q, and R310W were analysed. All disease variant proteins retain close to normal structure and solution behaviour. All mutations, apart from those affecting Arg310 outside the folded GDAP1 core domain, decreased thermal stability. In addition, a bioinformatics analysis was carried out to shed light on the conservation and evolution of GDAP1, which is an outlier member of the GST superfamily. GDAP1-like proteins branched early from the larger group of GSTs. Phylogenetic calculations could not resolve the exact early chronology, but the evolution of GDAP1 is roughly as old as the splits of archaea from other kingdoms. Many known CMT mutation sites involve conserved residues or interact with them. A central role for the ⍺6-⍺7 loop, within a conserved interaction network, is identified for GDAP1 protein stability. To conclude, we have expanded the structural analysis on GDAP1, strengthening the hypothesis that alterations in conserved intramolecular interactions may alter GDAP1 stability and function, eventually leading to mitochondrial dysfunction, impaired protein-protein interactions, and neuronal degeneration.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0284532

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 83

  1. ME Watts, 2018, Brain Energy and Oxygen Metabolism: Emerging Role in Normal Function and Disease., Front Mol Neurosci, 11, 216, 10.3389/fnmol.2018.00216 · DOI
  2. M Barneo-Munoz, 2015, Lack of GDAP1 induces neuronal calcium and mitochondrial defects in a knockout mouse model of charcot-marie-tooth neuropathy., PLoS Genet., 11, e1005115, 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005115 · DOI
  3. F Miressi, 2021, GDAP1 Involvement in Mitochondrial Function and Oxidative Stress, Investigated in a Charcot-Marie-Tooth Model of hiPSCs-Derived Motor Neurons., Biomedicines., 9, 10.3390/biomedicines9080945 · DOI
  4. D Pla-Martin, 2013, Silencing of the Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease-associated gene GDAP1 induces abnormal mitochondrial distribution and affects Ca2+ homeostasis by reducing store-operated Ca2+ entry, Neurobiol Dis, 55, 140, 10.1016/j.nbd.2013.03.010 · DOI
  5. A Rossi, 2019, Calcium, mitochondria and cell metabolism: A functional triangle in bioenergetics, Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Res, 1866, 1068, 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2018.10.016 · DOI
  6. A Niemann, 2005, Ganglioside-induced differentiation associated protein 1 is a regulator of the mitochondrial network: new implications for Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease, J Cell Biol, 170, 1067, 10.1083/jcb.200507087 · DOI
  7. A Niemann, 2009, GDAP1 mutations differ in their effects on mitochondrial dynamics and apoptosis depending on the mode of inheritance, Neurobiol Dis, 36, 509, 10.1016/j.nbd.2009.09.011 · DOI
  8. A Cuesta, 2002, The gene encoding ganglioside-induced differentiation-associated protein 1 is mutated in axonal Charcot-Marie-Tooth type 4A disease, Nat Genet, 30, 22, 10.1038/ng798 · DOI
  9. C Wolf, 2022, GDAP1 loss of function inhibits the mitochondrial pyruvate dehydrogenase complex by altering the actin cytoskeleton., Commun Biol., 5, 541, 10.1038/s42003-022-03487-6 · DOI
  10. MR Googins, 2020, Structural and functional divergence of GDAP1 from the glutathione S-transferase superfamily, The FASEB Journal, 34, 7192, 10.1096/fj.202000110R · DOI
  11. GTT Nguyen, 2020, Structure of the Complete Dimeric Human GDAP1 Core Domain Provides Insights into Ligand Binding and Clustering of Disease Mutations., Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences, 7, 631232, 10.3389/fmolb.2020.631232 · DOI
  12. A Sutinen, 2022, Structural insights into Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease-linked mutations in human GDAP1., FEBS Open Bio.
  13. B Mannervik, 1985, Identification of three classes of cytosolic glutathione transferase common to several mammalian species: correlation between structural data and enzymatic properties, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 82, 7202, 10.1073/pnas.82.21.7202 · DOI
  14. M. Fontés, 2018, Charcot Marie Tooth Disease. A Single Disorder?, International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 19, 10.3390/ijms19123807 · DOI
  15. AM Rossor, 2016, Recent advances in the genetic neuropathies, Current Opinion in Neurology, 29, 537, 10.1097/WCO.0000000000000373 · DOI
  16. C DiVincenzo, 2014, The allelic spectrum of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease in over 17,000 individuals with neuropathy., Mol Genet Genomic Med, 2, 522, 10.1002/mgg3.106 · DOI
  17. K Szigeti, 2009, Charcot–Marie–Tooth disease., European Journal of Human Genetics, 17, 703, 10.1038/ejhg.2009.31 · DOI
  18. J Cassereau, 2011, Mitochondrial dysfunction and pathophysiology of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease involving GDAP1 mutations, Experimental neurology, 227, 31, 10.1016/j.expneurol.2010.09.006 · DOI
  19. P-T Mai, 2019, Novel GDAP1 Mutation in a Vietnamese Family with Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease., BioMed research international., 2019, 7132494
  20. M Zimon, 2011, Dominant GDAP1 mutations cause predominantly mild CMT phenotypes, Neurology, 77, 540, 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318228fc70 · DOI
  21. RV Baxter, 2002, Ganglioside-induced differentiation-associated protein-1 is mutant in Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 4A/8q21, Nature genetics, 30, 21, 10.1038/ng796 · DOI
  22. W Rzepnikowska, 2018, A role for the GDAP1 gene in the molecular pathogenesis of CharcotMarieTooth disease., Acta neurobiologiae experimentalis, 78, 1, 10.21307/ane-2018-002 · DOI
  23. L Fagerberg, 2014, Analysis of the human tissue-specific expression by genome-wide integration of transcriptomics and antibody-based proteomics., Molecular & cellular proteomics: MCP., 13, 397, 10.1074/mcp.M113.035600 · DOI · Paper page
  24. S Dasari, 2018, Genetic polymorphism of glutathione S-transferases: Relevance to neurological disorders., Pathophysiology., 25, 285, 10.1016/j.pathophys.2018.06.001 · DOI
  25. A Kumar, 2017, Role of Glutathione-S-transferases in neurological problems., Expert Opin Ther Pat, 27, 299, 10.1080/13543776.2017.1254192 · DOI
  26. T Pandey, 2015, Functional classification and biochemical characterization of a novel rho class glutathione S-transferase in Synechocystis PCC 6803., FEBS Open Bio, 5, 1, 10.1016/j.fob.2014.11.006 · DOI
  27. S Pflugmacher, 2005, Activity and substrate specificity of cytosolic and microsomal glutathione S-transferase in Australian black tiger prawns (Penaeus monodon) after exposure to cyanobacterial toxins., Environmental Toxicology, 20, 301, 10.1002/tox.20121 · DOI
  28. FW Studier, 2005, Protein production by auto-induction in high density shaking cultures, Protein expression and purification, 41, 207, 10.1016/j.pep.2005.01.016 · DOI
  29. A Burkhardt, 2016, Status of the crystallography beamlines at PETRA III, The European Physical Journal Plus, 131, 56, 10.1140/epjp/i2016-16056-0 · DOI
  30. A Meents, 2013, SPIE Optical Engineering + Applications
  31. M Cianci, 2017, P13, the EMBL macromolecular crystallography beamline at the low-emittance PETRA III ring for high- and low-energy phasing with variable beam focusing., J Synchrotron Radiat., 24, 323, 10.1107/S1600577516016465 · DOI
  32. W. Kabsch, 2010, XDS, Acta crystallographica Section D, Biological crystallography, 66, 125, 10.1107/S0907444909047337 · DOI · Paper page
  33. AJ McCoy, 2007, Phaser crystallographic software, Journal of Applied Crystallography, 40, 658, 10.1107/S0021889807021206 · DOI · Paper page
  34. PV Afonine, 2012, Towards automated crystallographic structure refinement with ıt phenix.refine, Acta Crystallographica Section D, 68, 352, 10.1107/S0907444912001308 · DOI · Paper page
  35. P Emsley, 2010, Features and development of Coot, Acta crystallographica Section D, Biological crystallography, 66, 486, 10.1107/S0907444910007493 · DOI · Paper page
  36. VB Chen, 2010, MolProbity: all-atom structure validation for macromolecular crystallography, Acta crystallographica Section D, Biological crystallography, 66, 12, 10.1107/S0907444909042073 · DOI · Paper page
  37. J Huang, 2017, CHARMM36m: an improved force field for folded and intrinsically disordered proteins, Nat Methods, 14, 71, 10.1038/nmeth.4067 · DOI
  38. S Jo, 2017, CHARMM-GUI 10 years for biomolecular modeling and simulation, J Comput Chem, 38, 1114, 10.1002/jcc.24660 · DOI
  39. A Thureau, 2021, BioSAXS on the SWING beamline at Synchrotron SOLEIL, J Appl Crystallogr, 54, 1698, 10.1107/S1600576721008736 · DOI
  40. K Manalastas-Cantos, 2021, ATSAS 3.0: expanded functionality and new tools for small-angle scattering data analysis, J Appl Crystallogr, 54
  41. PV Konarev, 2003, PRIMUS: a Windows PC-based system for small-angle scattering data analysis, Journal of Applied Crystallography, 36, 1277, 10.1107/S0021889803012779 · DOI
  42. DI Svergun, 1992, Determination of the regularization parameter in indirect-transform methods using perceptual criteria, Journal of Applied Crystallography, 25, 495, 10.1107/S0021889892001663 · DOI
  43. DI Svergun, 2001, Determination of domain structure of proteins from x-ray solution scattering, Biophys J, 80, 2946, 10.1016/S0006-3495(01)76260-1 · DOI
  44. DI Svergun, 1999, Restoring low resolution structure of biological macromolecules from solution scattering using simulated annealing, Biophysical journal, 76, 2879, 10.1016/S0006-3495(99)77443-6 · DOI
  45. DI Svergun, 1995, CRYSOL—A program to evaluate X-ray solution scattering of biological macromolecules from atomic coordinates, J Appl Crystallogr, 28, 768, 10.1107/S0021889895007047 · DOI
  46. CE Blanchet, 2015, Versatile sample environments and automation for biological solution X-ray scattering experiments at the P12 beamline (PETRA III, DESY)., J Appl Crystallogr, 48, 431, 10.1107/S160057671500254X · DOI
  47. AJ Miles, 2018, CDtoolX, a downloadable software package for processing and analyses of circular dichroism spectroscopic data, Protein science: a publication of the Protein Society, 27, 1717, 10.1002/pro.3474 · DOI
  48. SF Altschul, 1997, Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs, Nucleic Acids Res, 25, 3389, 10.1093/nar/25.17.3389 · DOI · Paper page
  49. K Katoh, 2002, MAFFT: a novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform, Nucleic Acids Res, 30, 3059, 10.1093/nar/gkf436 · DOI · Paper page
  50. S Kullback, 1951, On information and sufficiency., Ann Math Stat, 22, 79, 10.1214/aoms/1177729694 · DOI · Paper page
  51. DJC Mackay, 2003, Information theory, inference, and learning algorithms: Cambridge University Press
  52. JP Huelsenbeck, 2001, MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees, Bioinformatics, 17, 754, 10.1093/bioinformatics/17.8.754 · DOI · Paper page
  53. F Ronquist, 2012, MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space, Syst Biol, 61, 539, 10.1093/sysbio/sys029 · DOI
  54. I Letunic, 2021, Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL) v5: an online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation., Nucleic Acids Res, 49, W293, 10.1093/nar/gkab301 · DOI
  55. AE Torda, 2020, sequtils 1.0., Zenodo, 4066305
  56. S Ruskamo, 2017, Molecular mechanisms of Charcot-Marie-Tooth neuropathy linked to mutations in human myelin protein P2., Sci Rep., 7, 6510, 10.1038/s41598-017-06781-0 · DOI
  57. M Uusitalo, 2021, Human myelin protein P2: from crystallography to time-lapse membrane imaging and neuropathy-associated variants., FEBS J, 288, 6716, 10.1111/febs.16079 · DOI
  58. KW Chung, 2008, A novel GDAP1 Q218E mutation in autosomal dominant Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease, J Hum Genet, 53, 360, 10.1007/s10038-008-0249-3 · DOI
  59. C Crimella, 2010, The GST domain of GDAP1 is a frequent target of mutations in the dominant form of axonal Charcot Marie Tooth type 2K, J Med Genet, 47, 712, 10.1136/jmg.2010.077909 · DOI
  60. D Kabzinska, 2014, A severe recessive and a mild dominant form of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease associated with a newly identified Glu222Lys GDAP1 gene mutation, Acta Biochim Pol, 61, 739, 10.18388/abp.2014_1839 · DOI
  61. I Moroni, 2009, Novel mutations in the GDAP1 gene in patients affected with early-onset axonal Charcot-Marie-Tooth type 4A, Neuromuscul Disord, 19, 476, 10.1016/j.nmd.2009.04.014 · DOI
  62. J Laimer, 2016, MAESTROweb: a web server for structure-based protein stability prediction, Bioinformatics, 32, 1414, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv769 · DOI
  63. V Parthiban, 2006, CUPSAT: prediction of protein stability upon point mutations, Nucleic Acids Res, 34, W239, 10.1093/nar/gkl190 · DOI
  64. L Pedrola, 2008, Cell expression of GDAP1 in the nervous system and pathogenesis of Charcot-Marie-Tooth type 4A disease, J Cell Mol Med, 12, 679, 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2007.00158.x · DOI
  65. A Raasakka, 2019, Neuropathy-related mutations alter the membrane binding properties of the human myelin protein P0 cytoplasmic tail., PLoS One., 14, e0216833, 10.1371/journal.pone.0216833 · DOI
  66. DL Sherman, 2018, A murine model of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease 4F reveals a role for the C-terminus of periaxin in the formation and stabilization of Cajal bands., Wellcome Open Res, 3, 20, 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.13673.1 · DOI
  67. C Marchesi, 2010, Four novel cases of periaxin-related neuropathy and review of the literature, Neurology, 75, 1830, 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181fd6314 · DOI
  68. A Raasakka, 2019, Direct Binding of the Flexible C-Terminal Segment of Periaxin to beta4 Integrin Suggests a Molecular Basis for CMT4F., Front Mol Neurosci., 12, 84, 10.3389/fnmol.2019.00084 · DOI
  69. H Azzedine, 2003, Variability of disease progression in a family with autosomal recessive CMT associated with a S194X and new R310Q mutation in the GDAP1 gene, Neuromuscul Disord, 13, 341, 10.1016/S0960-8966(02)00281-X · DOI
  70. K Nykamp, 2017, Sherloc: a comprehensive refinement of the ACMG-AMP variant classification criteria, Genet Med, 19, 1105, 10.1038/gim.2017.37 · DOI
  71. N Ammar, 2003, Identification of novel GDAP1 mutations causing autosomal recessive Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease, Neuromuscul Disord, 13, 720, 10.1016/S0960-8966(03)00093-2 · DOI
  72. J Cassereau, 2020, Oxidative stress contributes differentially to the pathophysiology of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 2K., Experimental neurology, 323, 113069, 10.1016/j.expneurol.2019.113069 · DOI
  73. KW Chung, 2011, Two recessive intermediate Charcot-Marie-Tooth patients with GDAP1 mutations., J Peripher Nerv Syst, 16, 143, 10.1111/j.1529-8027.2011.00329.x · DOI
  74. M Volodarsky, 2021, Comprehensive genetic sequence and copy number analysis for Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease in a Canadian cohort of 2517 patients, J Med Genet, 58, 284, 10.1136/jmedgenet-2019-106641 · DOI
  75. E Nelis, 2002, Mutations in GDAP1: autosomal recessive CMT with demyelination and axonopathy, Neurology, 59, 1865, 10.1212/01.WNL.0000036272.36047.54 · DOI
  76. T Antoniadi, 2015, Application of targeted multi-gene panel testing for the diagnosis of inherited peripheral neuropathy provides a high diagnostic yield with unexpected phenotype-genotype variability, BMC Med Genet, 16, 84, 10.1186/s12881-015-0224-8 · DOI
  77. D Kabzinska, 2011, A new missense GDAP1 mutation disturbing targeting to the mitochondrial membrane causes a severe form of AR-CMT2C disease, Neurogenetics, 12, 145, 10.1007/s10048-011-0276-7 · DOI
  78. W Rzepnikowska, 2020, Pathogenic Effect of GDAP1 Gene Mutations in a Yeast Model., Genes (Basel)., 11, 10.3390/genes11030310 · DOI
  79. I Kursula, 2005, Crystal structure of non-fused glutathione S-transferase from Schistosoma japonicum in complex with glutathione, Protein Pept Lett, 12, 709, 10.2174/0929866054696154 · DOI
  80. CF Boerkoel, 2003, CMT4A: identification of a Hispanic GDAP1 founder mutation, Ann Neurol, 53, 400, 10.1002/ana.10505 · DOI
  81. R Claramunt, 2005, Genetics of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 4A: mutations, inheritance, phenotypic variability, and founder effect, Journal of medical genetics, 42, 358, 10.1136/jmg.2004.022178 · DOI
  82. F Manganelli, 2012, A novel autosomal dominant GDAP1 mutation in an Italian CMT2 family., J Peripher Nerv Syst, 17, 351, 10.1111/j.1529-8027.2012.00414.x · DOI
  83. L Cantarero, 2021, Mitochondria-lysosome membrane contacts are defective in GDAP1-related Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease, Human Molecular Genetics, 29, 3589, 10.1093/hmg/ddaa243 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Sutinen, A., Paffenholz, D., Nguyen, G. T. T., Ruskamo, S., Torda, A. E., & Kursula, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Oulu (FI)
  • Universität Hamburg (DE)
  • University of Bergen (NO)
Corresponding author
Kursula, Petri
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2023-04-14
Volume
18
Issue
4
Pages
e0284532
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4365484688
Cited by
8
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1
FWCI
0.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Academy of Finland (24302881)
  • European Union Horizon 2020 (730872, 101004806 (MOSBRI-2021-24))
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Hereditary Neurological Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders
Keywords
GDAP1, Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease, missense mutations, protein stability, crystal structure, protein evolution, phylogenetic analysis, thermal stability, mitochondrial dysfunction, peripheral neuropathy
MeSH terms
Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease, Humans, Mutation, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Phylogeny, Protein Stability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review