Cited by 6Algal biology and biofuel productionAquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton DynamicsWastewater Treatment and Reuse

Feasibility and efficiency of microalgae cultivation for nutrient recycling and energy recovery from food waste filtrate

Open access
Chen, Yanghang, Wan, Wing-Wai, Cui, Kai-Hui, Lau, Bonnie Pui-Ying, Lee, Fred Wang-Fat, Xu, Steven Jing-Liang·2025·PLOS ONE

Abstract

With the continuous growth of economic and population, the generation of food waste has significantly increased in recent years. The disposition of food waste, typically through incineration or landfill, can lead to severe health and environmental problems, accompanied by high additional costs. However, the leachate produced from food waste during collection, transportation and landfill operations predominantly contains high levels of nutrients necessary for microalgae growth. The integration of microalgae cultivation into waste treatment for nutrient recycling presents a potential route for energy recovery from food waste. Therefore, this study was conducted to evaluate the feasibility of microalgae cultivation for food waste filtrate treatment. In addition, the optimal cultivation conditions and nutrient removal efficiency for microalgae in food waste filtrate treatment were investigated. The results indicated that Cyanobacterium aponinum exhibited the highest growth rate (0.530 cells d-1) and maximum cell density (9.6 × 10 6 cells mL-1) among eight potential microalgal species in 10% food waste filtrate treatment under 10,000 lux and 32°C. It was also observed that C. aponinum had significantly higher biomass productivity and nutrient removal efficiency under a 5% CO 2 concentration. The successful cultivation of C. aponinum demonstrated that food waste filtrate could be a promising growth medium, reducing the high cost of cultivation with synthetic medium. However, further efforts should be made to utilize microalgae in food waster filtrate treatment, transitioning from laboratory condition to a pilot scale.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0315801

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Photoinhibition can occur during the midday hours, when light intensity can reach up to 4000 μmol E/m2-s. In diatoms, this phenomenon has been observed at a light intensity of about 10,000 lux (180 μmol E/m2-s), and similar results have been reported for cyanobacteria.

    “Photoinhibition can occur during the midday hours, when light intensity can reach up to 4000 µ mol E/m 2 -s. In diatoms, this phenomenon has been observed at a light intensity of about 10,000 lux (180 µ mol E/m 2 -s), and similar results have been reported for cyanobacteria [145].”

    From Multi-Sensing Monitoring of the Microalgae Biomass Cultivation Systems for Biofuels and Added Value Products Synthesis—Challenges and Opportunities (2025) · cites this paper as [145]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 1 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 59 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [31]Larsdotter K. Wastewater treatment with microalgae-a literature review. Vatten. 2006; 62: 31.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, Y., Wan, W.-W., Cui, K.-H., Lau, B. P.-Y., Lee, F. W.-F., & Xu, S. J.-L.
Affiliations
  • Ministry of Natural Resources (CN)
  • Hong Kong Metropolitan University (HK)
  • City University of Hong Kong (HK)
Corresponding author
  • Lee, Fred Wang-Fat
  • Xu, Steven Jing-Liang
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2025-02-05
Volume
20
Issue
2
Pages
e0315801
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4407159907
Cited by
6
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4
FWCI
0.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2022YFC3102401, 2022YFC2601302)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Wastewater Treatment and Reuse
Keywords
microalgae cultivation, food waste leachate, nutrient cycling, energy recovery, microalgae growth, nutrient removal efficiency, CO2 concentration, biomass productivity, growth conditions, landfill leachate treatment
MeSH terms
Nutrients, Food Loss and Waste, Cyanobacteria, Feasibility Studies, Food, Biomass, Microalgae, Recycling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review