Cited by 0

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The role of prehabilitation in improving brain health and cognition after chemotherapy in patients with colorectal cancer: Study protocol of the Chemo Brain Prehab Project

Hoad, Katie Lauren, Ton, Chan, Williamson, Deborah, Subar, Daren Anselm, Nuttall, Helen Elizabeth, Gaffney, Christopher James·2026·PLOS One

Abstract

Introduction: Regional disparities in the incidence of colorectal cancer remain a concern within the United Kingdom, particularly in the North West of England, with 37% higher incidences than the national average. Given the growing burden of treatment-related side effects such as cognitive impairment, this study aims to investigate whether prehabilitation can improve brain health and cognitive function in patients with colorectal cancer receiving adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Methods: This randomised control trial will recruit eighty-six patients with stage II and III colorectal cancer, who will receive adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (fluorouracil, capecitabine, or oxaliplatin) and will be randomised between prehabilitation and standard care groups. The prehabilitation group will be provided an individualised, home-based exercise programme before and during chemotherapy, multivitamin supplementation, telephone check-ins, and activity devices. The standard care group will be provided with information about physical activity and nutrition at the start of the intervention. Habitual physical activity will be tracked in all patients. Assessments will be conducted at baseline, 72 hours before the first chemotherapy administration, and 72–96 hours after the final treatment. Outcome measures will include cardiopulmonary fitness, neurotrophic biomarkers, electroencephalographic activity, cognitive function tests, and a cognitive-related quality of life assessment. Discussion: This study protocol is designed to test whether home-based prehabilitation can improve brain health and reduce chemotherapy-related cognitive impairments in patients with colorectal cancer. Insights from this work may support the development of more accessible and effective prehabilitation programmes to address treatment specific cognitive impairment. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT07341217

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0341996

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 52

  1. J Franklyn, 2023, Geographical variations in long term colorectal cancer outcomes in England: a contemporary population analysis revealing the north-south divide in colorectal cancer survival, Surg Endosc, 37, 5340, 10.1007/s00464-023-10003-2 · DOI
  2. KF Brown, 2018, The fraction of cancer attributable to modifiable risk factors in England, Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland, and the United Kingdom in 2015, Br J Cancer, 118, 1130, 10.1038/s41416-018-0029-6 · DOI
  3. S Upadhyay, 2015, Chemotherapy use in stage III colon cancer: a National Cancer Database analysis, Ther Adv Med Oncol, 7, 244, 10.1177/1758834015587867 · DOI
  4. JE Lambert, 2021, The Impact of Prehabilitation on Patient Outcomes in Hepatobiliary, Colorectal, and Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Surgery: A PRISMA-Accordant Meta-analysis, Ann Surg, 274, 70, 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004527 · DOI
  5. P Zimmer, 2016, Effects of Exercise Interventions and Physical Activity Behavior on Cancer Related Cognitive Impairments: A Systematic Review, Biomed Res Int, 2016, 1820954, 10.1155/2016/1820954 · DOI · Paper page
  6. SI Mishra, 2012, Exercise interventions on health-related quality of life for cancer survivors, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2012
  7. TA Ahles, 2012, Cancer- and cancer treatment–associated cognitive change: an update on the state of the science, Journal of Clinical Oncology, 30, 3675, 10.1200/JCO.2012.43.0116 · DOI
  8. SY Hwang, 2021, Neurocognitive effects of chemotherapy for colorectal cancer: a systematic review and a meta-analysis of 11 studies, Cancer Research and Treatment, 53, 1134, 10.4143/crt.2020.1191 · DOI
  9. KL Campbell, 2020, The Effect of Exercise on Cancer-Related Cognitive Impairment and Applications for Physical Therapy: Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials, Phys Ther, 100, 523, 10.1093/ptj/pzz090 · DOI
  10. MG Falleti, 2005, The nature and severity of cognitive impairment associated with adjuvant chemotherapy in women with breast cancer: a meta-analysis of the current literature, Brain Cogn, 59, 60, 10.1016/j.bandc.2005.05.001 · DOI
  11. N Boykoff, 2009, Confronting chemobrain: an in-depth look at survivors’ reports of impact on work, social networks, and health care response, J Cancer Surviv, 3, 223, 10.1007/s11764-009-0098-x · DOI
  12. HE Nuttall, 2025, Exercise prehabilitation for brain health and sensory-cognitive function: Mechanistic insights into brain-body interactions, Exp Physiol
  13. F Farhani, 2022, Effects of Aerobic Training on Brain Plasticity in Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials, Brain Sci, 12, 732, 10.3390/brainsci12060732 · DOI
  14. J Vítor, 2023, Physical activity in vascular cognitive impairment: Systematic review with meta-analysis, J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis, 32, 107133, 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2023.107133 · DOI
  15. AD Hutchinson, 2012, Objective and subjective cognitive impairment following chemotherapy for cancer: a systematic review, Cancer Treat Rev, 38, 926, 10.1016/j.ctrv.2012.05.002 · DOI
  16. CM Bender, 2008, What do perceived cognitive problems reflect?, J Support Oncol, 6, 238
  17. MJJ Pullens, 2010, Subjective cognitive dysfunction in breast cancer patients: a systematic review, Psychooncology, 19, 1127, 10.1002/pon.1673 · DOI
  18. ST Orange, 2021, Effectiveness of diet and physical activity interventions amongst adults attending colorectal and breast cancer screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Cancer Causes Control, 32, 13
  19. EJ Oosterhuis, 2023, Toward an understanding of healthy cognitive aging: the importance of lifestyle in cognitive reserve and the scaffolding theory of aging and cognition, The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 78, 777, 10.1093/geronb/gbac197 · DOI
  20. B Rich, 2017, Skeletal myofiber vascular endothelial growth factor is required for the exercise training-induced increase in dentate gyrus neuronal precursor cells, J Physiol, 595, 5931, 10.1113/JP273994 · DOI
  21. C Ruiz de Almodovar, 2009, Role and therapeutic potential of VEGF in the nervous system, Physiol Rev, 89, 607, 10.1152/physrev.00031.2008 · DOI
  22. J El-Sayes, 2019, Exercise-Induced Neuroplasticity: A Mechanistic Model and Prospects for Promoting Plasticity, Neuroscientist, 25, 65, 10.1177/1073858418771538 · DOI
  23. H Stewart, 2025, The inequalities and challenges of prehabilitation before cancer surgery: a narrative review, Anaesthesia, 80, 75, 10.1111/anae.16502 · DOI
  24. CL Craig, 2003, International Physical Activity Questionnaire: 12-Country Reliability and Validity, Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 35, 1381, 10.1249/01.MSS.0000078924.61453.FB · DOI · Paper page
  25. DE Warburton, 2011, The Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire for Everyone (PAR-Q) and Electronic Physical Activity Readiness Medical Examination (ePARmed-X): Summary of Consensus Panel Recommendations, The Health & Fitness Journal of Canada, 4, 26
  26. SN Abayomi, 2024, The diagnostic accuracy of the Mini-Cog screening tool for the detection of cognitive impairment-A systematic review and meta-analysis, PLoS One, 19, 10.1371/journal.pone.0298686 · DOI
  27. APD Jansen, 2008, Self-reports on the IQCODE in older adults: a psychometric evaluation, J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol, 21, 83, 10.1177/0891988707311558 · DOI
  28. CJ Jones, 2002, Measuring functional, The Journal on Active Aging, 1, 24
  29. MS Hagger, 2022, Perceived behavioral control moderating effects in the theory of planned behavior: A meta-analysis, Health Psychol, 41, 155, 10.1037/hea0001153 · DOI
  30. DK Gabrielson, 2013, Use of an abridged scored Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (abPG-SGA) as a nutritional screening tool for cancer patients in an outpatient setting, Nutr Cancer, 65, 234, 10.1080/01635581.2013.755554 · DOI
  31. DJ Chambers, 2019, Cardiopulmonary exercise testing-a beginner’s guide to the nine-panel plot, BJA Educ, 19, 158, 10.1016/j.bjae.2019.01.009 · DOI
  32. S Jaiswal, 2025, Breath-Focused Mindfulness and Compassion Training in Parent-Child Dyads: Pilot Intervention Study, JMIR Form Res, 9
  33. S Weintraub, 2014, The cognition battery of the NIH toolbox for assessment of neurological and behavioral function: validation in an adult sample, J Int Neuropsychol Soc, 20, 567, 10.1017/S1355617714000320 · DOI · Paper page
  34. V Koch, 2021, Assessing neurocognitive symptoms in cancer patients and controls: psychometric properties of the FACT-Cog3, Curr Psychol, 42, 9526, 10.1007/s12144-021-02088-6 · DOI
  35. MTM Alvarenga, 2025, Criterion validity and accuracy of actigraph and Xiaomi Smart Band to count steps after stroke, Disabil Rehabil, 47, 3441, 10.1080/09638288.2024.2420840 · DOI
  36. A Santos-Lozano, 2012, Intermonitor variability of GT3X accelerometer, Int J Sports Med, 33, 994, 10.1055/s-0032-1312580 · DOI
  37. P Concheiro-Moscoso, 2025, ReSTech project on Xiaomi wearable devices for monitoring and detecting obstructive sleep apnoea: observational study protocol, BMJ Open, 15, 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-101824 · DOI
  38. S Hopewell, 2025, CONSORT 2025 explanation and elaboration: updated guideline for reporting randomised trials, BMJ, 389
  39. TR Fitzpatrick, 2012, Assessing the relationship between physical fitness activities, cognitive health, and quality of life among older cancer survivors, J Psychosoc Oncol, 30, 556, 10.1080/07347332.2012.703768 · DOI
  40. B Oh, 2012, Effect of medical Qigong on cognitive function, quality of life, and a biomarker of inflammation in cancer patients: a randomized controlled trial, Supportive Care in Cancer, 20, 1235, 10.1007/s00520-011-1209-6 · DOI
  41. L Adamsen, 2006, The effect of a multidimensional exercise intervention on physical capacity, well-being and quality of life in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy, Support Care Cancer, 14, 116
  42. IJ Deary, 2009, Age-associated cognitive decline, Br Med Bull, 92, 135, 10.1093/bmb/ldp033 · DOI · Paper page
  43. YE Geda, 2012, Mild cognitive impairment in older adults, Curr Psychiatry Rep, 14, 320, 10.1007/s11920-012-0291-x · DOI
  44. GD Searchfield, 2024, The CogniAid trial. The impact of two hearing aid signal processing strategies on cognition, Front Audiol Otol, 2, 10.3389/fauot.2024.1285496 · DOI
  45. JG Foy, 2020, Dynamic changes in EEG power spectral densities during NIH-toolbox flanker, dimensional change card sort test and episodic memory tests in young adults, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 14, 158, 10.3389/fnhum.2020.00158 · DOI
  46. J Swainston, 2021, Neurocognitive efficiency in breast cancer survivorship: A performance monitoring ERP study, Int J Psychophysiol, 168, 9, 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2021.06.013 · DOI
  47. T Glaab, 2022, Practical guide to cardiopulmonary exercise testing in adults, Respir Res, 23, 9, 10.1186/s12931-021-01895-6 · DOI
  48. DZH Levett, 2018, Perioperative cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET): consensus clinical guidelines on indications, organization, conduct, and physiological interpretation, Br J Anaesth, 120, 484, 10.1016/j.bja.2017.10.020 · DOI
  49. L Wareing, 2025, Defining criteria for quality and equity in prehabilitation services before cancer surgery: a Delphi study informed by lived and professional experience, Eur J Cancer Care
  50. A Boaz, 2015, Does the engagement of clinicians and organisations in research improve healthcare performance: a three-stage review, BMJ Open, 5, 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009415 · DOI
  51. A Pesce, 2024, A randomized controlled clinical trial on multimodal prehabilitation in colorectal cancer patients to improve functional capacity: preliminary results, Surg Endosc, 38, 7440, 10.1007/s00464-024-11198-8 · DOI
  52. J Lambert, 2024, Prehabilitation for Gastrointestinal Cancer Surgery, Recent Strategies in High Risk Surgery, 69, 10.1007/978-3-031-56270-9_5 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Hoad, K. L., Ton, C., Williamson, D., Subar, D. A., Nuttall, H. E., & Gaffney, C. J.
Venue
PLOS One
Published
2026-03-03
Volume
21
Issue
3
Pages
e0341996
ISSN
1932-6203
Cited by
0
References
4
Language
en
Funders
North West Cancer Research (AR2024.07GAFFNEY)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review