The effect of auditors’ digital literacy on reduced audit quality behavior: A chain mediation model and the moderating role of prosocial behavior
Open accessAbstract
Reduced audit quality behavior is prevalent in audit practice and poses a serious threat to overall audit quality. With the increasing adoption of digital auditing, auditors’ digital literacy has become essential not only for adapting to the modern audit environment but also for improving audit quality and curbing inappropriate audit practices. This study examines the effect of auditors’ digital literacy on reduced audit quality behavior by introducing digital self-efficacy and task performance as mediating variables and constructing a chain mediation model, while also exploring the moderating role of prosocial behavior. Empirical analysis based on 480 valid questionnaires revealed that digital literacy negatively influences reduced audit quality behavior. Digital self-efficacy and task performance partially mediate this relationship. Additionally, digital self-efficacy positively enhances task performance, resulting in a chain mediating effect. Prosocial behavior moderates these relationships, significantly affecting the mediating roles of digital self-efficacy and task performance. Accordingly, fostering a digitally enabled audit environment that enhances auditors’ analytical efficiency, judgment accuracy, and procedural compliance requires auditors to effectively leverage digital technologies to mitigate audit quality-threatening behavior.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Cheung, G. W., Cooper-Thomas, H. D., Lau, R. S., & Wang, L. C. (2024) · Asia Pacific Journal of Management · doi:10.1007/s10490-023-09871-y · Cited by 2,262 · cited 10× · see citing works
“The standardized indirect effect (ab) was −0.051, with a 95% bootstrap confidence interval of [−0.086, −0.024], excluding zero [41].”
InfluentialTesting and Controlling for Common Method Variance: A Review of Available Methods
Tehseen, S., Ramayah, T., & Sajilan, S. (2017) · Journal of Management Sciences · doi:10.20547/jms.2014.1704202 · Cited by 1,380 · see citing works
Dealing with Multicollinearity in Factor Analysis: The Problem, Detections, and Solutions
Kyriazos, T. A., & Poga, M. (2023) · Open Journal of Statistics · doi:10.4236/ojs.2023.133020 · Cited by 325 · see citing works
Lam, S. S. K., Chen, X.-P., & Schaubroeck, J. M. (2002) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/3069321 · Cited by 325 · see citing works
Assessing digital self-efficacy: Review and scale development
Ulfert, A., & Schmidt, I. (2022) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104626 · Cited by 270 · see citing works
Bozionelos, N., & Simmering, M. J. (2021) · Human Resource Management Journal · doi:10.1111/1748-8583.12398 · Cited by 225 · see citing works
Measuring Prosociality: The Development of a Prosocial Behavioral Intentions Scale
Baumsteiger, R., & Siegel, J. T. (2018) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1080/00223891.2017.1411918 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
Knechel, W. R. (2016) · International Journal of Auditing · doi:10.1111/ijau.12077 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
Duan, S. X., Deng, H., & Wibowo, S. (2023) · Information Technology and People · doi:10.1108/itp-01-2021-0013 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Smith, K. J., & Emerson, D. J. (2017) · Advances in Accounting · doi:10.1016/j.adiac.2017.04.003 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Eulerich, M., Masli, A. N. S., Pickerd, J. S., & Wood, D. A. (2022) · Contemporary Accounting Research · doi:10.1111/1911-3846.12847 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Correlation Tests in R: Pearson Cor, Kendall’s Tau, and Spearman’s Rho
OKOYE, K. O., & Hosseini, S. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-97-3385-9_12 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Sample size and power calculations for causal mediation analysis: A Tutorial and Shiny App
Qin, X. (2023) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-023-02118-0 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
JOB PERFORMANCE, TASK PERFORMANCE, CONTEXTUAL PERFORMANCE: DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF A NEW SCALE
Çalışkan, A., & Köroğlu, E. Ö. (2022) · Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi · doi:10.29131/uiibd.1201880 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Clients’ digitalization, audit firms’ digital expertise, and audit quality: evidence from China
Rahman, M. J., & Ziru, A. (2022) · International Journal of Accounting and Information Management · doi:10.1108/ijaim-08-2022-0170 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Perceived Adverse Consequences of Quality Threatening Behaviour in Audit Firms
Pierce, B. J., & Sweeney, B. (2006) · International Journal of Auditing · doi:10.1111/j.1099-1123.2006.00289.x · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Auditors in the digital age: a systematic literature review
Leocádio, D., Malheiro, L., & dos Reis, J. C. G. (2024) · Digital Transformation and Society · doi:10.1108/dts-02-2024-0014 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Al‐Hattami, H. M. (2025) · The International Journal of Management Education · doi:10.1016/j.ijme.2025.101131 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Ahmed, T., Yang, C., Hongjuan, Y., & Mahmood, S. (2022) · Psychology Research and Behavior Management · doi:10.2147/prbm.s357083 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Tetteh, L. A., Agyenim‐Boateng, C., Kwarteng, A., et al. (2021) · Journal of Applied Accounting Research · doi:10.1108/jaar-03-2021-0079 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Choi, H., Kim, H., Hong, T., & An, J. (2023) · Building and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2023.110298 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Yulianti, Y., Zarkasyi, M. W., Suharman, H., et al. (2023) · Journal of Islamic accounting and business research · doi:10.1108/jiabr-02-2021-0076 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
The influence of digital literacy on mHealth app usability: The mediating role of patient expertise
Durmuş, A. (2024) · Digital Health · doi:10.1177/20552076241299061 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Bootstrap-quantile ridge estimator for linear regression with applications
Dar, I. S., & Chand, S. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0302221 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Yunis, M. M., Mirza, N., Safi, A., & Umar, M. I. (2024) · Global Finance Journal · doi:10.1016/j.gfj.2024.101026 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Ifada, L. M., & Komara, A. (2023) · Jurnal Kajian Akuntansi · doi:10.33603/jka.v7i1.8454 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Kassem, R., & Omoteso, K. (2023) · Journal of Accounting Literature · doi:10.1108/jal-03-2023-0055 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Zervas, I. M., & Stiakakis, E. (2025) · Administrative Sciences · doi:10.3390/admsci15070267 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Thanasas, G. L., Kampiotis, G., & Karkantzou, A. (2025) · Theoretical Economics Letters · doi:10.4236/tel.2025.151013 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Audit team equality and audit quality threatening behaviour
Annelin, A. (2022) · Managerial Auditing Journal · doi:10.1108/maj-08-2021-3288 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Azizi, M., Hakimi, M., Amiri, F., et al. (2024) · Open Access Indonesia Journal of Social Sciences · doi:10.37275/oaijss.v7i2.230 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Digital transformation and corporate audit risk: Mediating effects of auditor behavior
Zhang, L., & bin Balia, S. S. (2024) · Finance research letters · doi:10.1016/j.frl.2024.105754 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Zhao, M., Li, Y., & Lu, J. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1082889 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
The relationship between soft skills, stress and reduced audit quality practices
Samagaio, A., Francisco, P. M., & Felício, T. (2024) · Review of Accounting and Finance · doi:10.1108/raf-06-2023-0186 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Self-efficacy, professional ethics, and internal audit quality
Djaddang, S., & Lysandra, S. (2022) · Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis · doi:10.24914/jeb.v25i2.3794 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Sayal, A., Johri, A., Chaithra, N., et al. (2025) · Journal of Open Innovation Technology Market and Complexity · doi:10.1016/j.joitmc.2025.100573 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Douthit, J. D., Kachelmeier, S. J., & Landuyt, B. W. V. (2024) · Accounting Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/j.aos.2024.101550 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Reduced audit quality acts: A review and organizational model
Hyatt, T. A., Prawitt, D. F., & Stubbs, K. M. (2023) · International Journal of Auditing · doi:10.1111/ijau.12331 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
A bootstrap study of minimal model deformations
Antunes, A., Lauria, E., & van Rees, B. C. (2024) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep05(2024)027 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Eulerich, M., Summers, S. L., & Wood, D. A. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5245259 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
The Influence of Audit Technology on Audit Efficiency and Effectiveness: Auditor’s Perspective
Taunaumang, H., Lima, R., & Gomez, R. (2025) · Journal Markcount Finance · doi:10.70177/jmf.v3i1.2139 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Siti, S., & Syahzuni, B. A. (2025) · International Journal of Economics Management and Accounting (IJEMA) · doi:10.47353/ijema.v2i10.250 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- [3]Ismanidar N, Maksum A, Gultom P, Meutia R. The effect of auditor competence and remote audit support on audit quality through digital-based governance with information technology as moderating variable in state financial audit. International Journal of Business and Technology Management. 2022; 4(2): 7– 17. doi: 10.18576/amis/170512 · DOI
- [17]Yongyue Z, Lihua Y. The influence of digital leadership on employee agility in manufacturing: A cognitive-affective dual-path perspective. Science & Technology Progress and Policy. 2024; 41(24): 140– 9. doi: 10.6049/kjjbydc.2023120209 · DOI
- [31]Shihong W, Fanbin K. Perceived organizational support and government auditors’ psychological contract violation on EVLN behavior. Social Sciences in Nanjing. 2015; 3(7): 88– 94. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8263.2015.03.013 · DOI
- [34]Yongwei W, Jiahao W, Sen G, Weijie W. Influence Mechanism of Empowering Leadership - Employee Empowering Perception Matching on Task Performance. Technology Economics. 2024; 43(5): 95– 106. doi: 10.12404/j.issn.1002-980X.J23102606 · DOI
- Authors
- Yang, M., Guo, L., Ren, G., Wang, Q., & Liu, Y.
- Affiliations
- Jiujiang University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Guo, Lei
- ORCID
- Guo, Lei
- Venue
- PLOS One
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2026-07-02
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- e0350835
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC13327184
- OpenAlex
- W7167041234
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 42
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 72464017)
- Humanities and Social Science Fund of Ministry of Education of China (No. 23YJAZH116)
- Educational Science Planning Project of Jiangxi Province in China (23YB232)
- Key Research Base Project of Philosophy and Social Sciences of Jiangxi Province in China (No. 24ZXSKJD51)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Governance and Financial Management
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Financial Literacy and Behavior
- Keywords
- digital self-efficacy, task performance, prosocial behavior, serial mediation, digital audit, audit quality, moderating effect
- MeSH terms
- Computer Literacy, Humans, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Behavior, Task Performance and Analysis, Self Efficacy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
