Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 261

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Ancestral Genomes, Sex, and the Population Structure of Trypanosoma cruzi

Open access
de Freitas, Jorge M., Augusto-Pinto, Luiz, Pimenta, Juliana R, Bastos-Rodrigues, Luciana, Gonçalves, Vanessa F, Teixeira, Santuza M. R, Chiari, Egler, Junqueira, Ângela C. V, Fernandes, Octavio, Macedo, Andréa M, Machado, Carlos Renato, Pena, Sérgio D. J·2006·PLoS Pathogens

Abstract

Acquisition of detailed knowledge of the structure and evolution of Trypanosoma cruzi populations is essential for control of Chagas disease. We profiled 75 strains of the parasite with five nuclear microsatellite loci, 24Salpha RNA genes, and sequence polymorphisms in the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase subunit II gene. We also used sequences available in GenBank for the mitochondrial genes cytochrome B and NADH dehydrogenase subunit 1. A multidimensional scaling plot (MDS) based in microsatellite data divided the parasites into four clusters corresponding to T. cruzi I (MDS-cluster A), T. cruzi II (MDS-cluster C), a third group of T. cruzi strains (MDS-cluster B), and hybrid strains (MDS-cluster BH). The first two clusters matched respectively mitochondrial clades A and C, while the other two belonged to mitochondrial clade B. The 24Salpha rDNA and microsatellite profiling data were combined into multilocus genotypes that were analyzed by the haplotype reconstruction program PHASE. We identified 141 haplotypes that were clearly distributed into three haplogroups (X, Y, and Z). All strains belonging to T. cruzi I (MDS-cluster A) were Z/Z, the T. cruzi II strains (MDS-cluster C) were Y/Y, and those belonging to MDS-cluster B (unclassified T. cruzi) had X/X haplogroup genotypes. The strains grouped in the MDS-cluster BH were X/Y, confirming their hybrid character. Based on these results we propose the following minimal scenario for T. cruzi evolution. In a distant past there were at a minimum three ancestral lineages that we may call, respectively, T. cruzi I, T. cruzi II, and T. cruzi III. At least two hybridization events involving T. cruzi II and T. cruzi III produced evolutionarily viable progeny. In both events, the mitochondrial recipient (as identified by the mitochondrial clade of the hybrid strains) was T. cruzi II and the mitochondrial donor was T. cruzi III.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.ppat.0020024

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 21 references

Cited by

See all 261

Metadata

Authors
de Freitas, J. M., Augusto-Pinto, L., Pimenta, J. R., Bastos-Rodrigues, L., Gonçalves, V. F., Teixeira, S. M. R., Chiari, E., Junqueira, Â. C. V., Fernandes, O., Macedo, A. M., Machado, C. R., & Pena, S. D. J.
Venue
PLoS Pathogens
Published
2006-03-31
Volume
2
Issue
3
Pages
e24
ISSN
  • 1553-7366 (ISSN-L)
  • 1553-7374
OpenAlex
W2045346667
Cited by
261
References
21
FWCI
11.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ancestral Genomes, Sex, and the Population Structure of Trypanosoma cruzi. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.ppat.0020024
The paper
de Freitas, J. M., Augusto-Pinto, L., Pimenta, J. R., Bastos-Rodrigues, L., Gonçalves, V. F., Teixeira, S. M. R., Chiari, E., Junqueira, Â. C. V., Fernandes, O., Macedo, A. M., Machado, C. R., & Pena, S. D. J. (2006). Ancestral Genomes, Sex, and the Population Structure of Trypanosoma cruzi. PLoS Pathogens. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.0020024

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.