Cited by 292Legionella and Acanthamoeba researchCellular transport and secretionMicrobial infections and disease research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Legionella pneumophila Exploits PI(4)P to Anchor Secreted Effector Proteins to the Replicative Vacuole

Open access
Weber, Stefan S, Ragaz, Curdin, Reus, Katrin, Nyfeler, Yves, Hilbi, Hubert·2006·PLoS Pathogens

Abstract

The causative agent of Legionnaires' disease, Legionella pneumophila, employs the intracellular multiplication (Icm)/defective organelle trafficking (Dot) type IV secretion system (T4SS) to upregulate phagocytosis and to establish a replicative vacuole in amoebae and macrophages. Legionella-containing vacuoles (LCVs) do not fuse with endosomes but recruit early secretory vesicles. Here we analyze the role of host cell phosphoinositide (PI) metabolism during uptake and intracellular replication of L. pneumophila. Genetic and pharmacological evidence suggests that class I phosphatidylinositol(3) kinases (PI3Ks) are dispensable for phagocytosis of wild-type L. pneumophila but inhibit intracellular replication of the bacteria and participate in the modulation of the LCV. Uptake and degradation of an icmT mutant strain lacking a functional Icm/Dot transporter was promoted by PI3Ks. We identified Icm/Dot-secreted proteins which specifically bind to phosphatidylinositol(4) phosphate (PI(4)P) in vitro and preferentially localize to LCVs in the absence of functional PI3Ks. PI(4)P was found to be present on LCVs using as a probe either an antibody against PI(4)P or the PH domain of the PI(4)P-binding protein FAPP1 (phosphatidylinositol(4) phosphate adaptor protein-1). Moreover, the presence of PI(4)P on LCVs required a functional Icm/Dot T4SS. Our results indicate that L. pneumophila modulates host cell PI metabolism and exploits the Golgi lipid second messenger PI(4)P to anchor secreted effector proteins to the LCV.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.ppat.0020046

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 58 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. HarlowELaneD 1999 Immunoaffinity purification. In: HarlowELaneD Using antibodies: A laboratory manual Plainview (New York) Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press pp. 311 343

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–289 of 289

Metadata

Authors
Weber, S. S., Ragaz, C., Reus, K., Nyfeler, Y., & Hilbi, H.
Affiliations
ETH Zurich (CH)
Corresponding author
Hilbi, Hubert
Venue
PLoS Pathogens
Published
2006-05-19
Volume
2
Issue
5
Pages
e46
ISSN
  • 1553-7366 (ISSN-L)
  • 1553-7374
OpenAlex
W1989102699
Cited by
292
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 22
FWCI
9.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS Pathogens (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • ETH Zürich Research Collection (cc-by)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Velux Stiftung
  • University of Dundee
  • Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (065952)
  • Paul Scherrer Institut
  • University of California, San Diego
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Endocrinology › Legionella and Acanthamoeba research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular transport and secretion
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Microbial infections and disease research
Keywords
Legionella pneumophila, phosphatidylinositol 4-phosphate, type IV secretion system, effector proteins, Legionella-containing vacuole, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, phagocytosis, intracellular bacterial replication, Legionnaires' disease
MeSH terms
Animals, Bacterial Proteins, Cell Line, Dictyostelium, Humans, Molecular Sequence Data, Mutation, Phagocytosis, Tissue Distribution, Vacuoles, Organelles, Biomarkers, Legionella pneumophila, Phosphatidylinositol Phosphates, Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinases, Protein Transport, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review