Cited by 0Virus-based gene therapy researchBacteriophages and microbial interactionsVirology and Viral Diseases

The adeno-associated virus Rep proteins target PP4:SMEK1 by preventing substrate recruitment

Open access
Vandewinkel, Bram, Torrekens, Sophie, Claes, Zander, Bollen, Mathieu, Henckaerts, Els·2026·PLOS Pathogens

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Despite the widespread use of adeno-associated virus (AAV) vectors in gene therapy, their clinical efficacy and large-scale manufacturing remain constrained by an incomplete understanding of the virus-host interactions that govern AAV gene expression and replication. Here, we identify the PP4:SMEK1/2 phosphatase complex as an important regulator of wild-type AAV replication. Binding studies show that the AAV replication proteins engage SMEK1 to negatively influence PP4 activity. Specifically, AAV Rep68 interferes with substrate recruitment to the PP4:SMEK1 complex, resulting in hyperphosphorylation of the PP4 substrates KAP1 S824 and RPA2 S4/8/33 , which in turn enhances viral gene expression and replication. We further uncover a direct interaction between KAP1 and SMEK1, mediated by a MAPP short linear motif that binds the SMEK1 EVH1 domain. Additionally, we identify a multifunctional complex comprising PP4:SMEK1 and PP1:NIPP1 that contributes to KAP1 S824 dephosphorylation. These findings reveal a previously unrecognized mechanism by which viruses subvert host phosphatases to promote replication. This mechanistic insight not only advances our understanding of AAV and phosphatase biology but also has the potential to inform strategies for enhancing AAV vector potency.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.ppat.1014025

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Vandewinkel, B., Torrekens, S., Claes, Z., Bollen, M., & Henckaerts, E.
Affiliations
KU Leuven (BE)
Corresponding author
Henckaerts, Els
Venue
PLOS Pathogens
Published
2026-03-10
Volume
22
Issue
3
Pages
e1014025
ISSN
  • 1553-7366 (ISSN-L)
  • 1553-7374
OpenAlex
W7134900468
Cited by
0
References
5
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS Pathogens (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (G0C3220N, 1S58121N)
  • KU Leuven (3M190475)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Virus-based gene therapy research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Bacteriophages and microbial interactions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Virology and Viral Diseases
Keywords
adeno-associated virus, KAP1, RPA, PP1 phosphatase, NIPP1, host-virus interaction, viral replication, substrate recruitment, protein phosphorylation, EVH1 domain, adeno-associated virus vectors
MeSH terms
Tripartite Motif-Containing Protein 28, Dependovirus, DNA-Binding Proteins, Humans, Phosphoprotein Phosphatases, Phosphorylation, Viral Proteins, Virus Replication, HEK293 Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review