The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Toward Resolving the Challenges of Sepsis Diagnosis
Abstract
Sepsis in the United States has an estimated annual healthcare cost of $16.7 billion and leads to 120 000 deaths. Insufficient development in both medical diagnosis and treatment of sepsis has led to continued growth in reported cases of sepsis over the past two decades with little improvement in mortality statistics. Efforts over the last decade to improve diagnosis have unsuccessfully sought to identify a “magic bullet” proteic biomarker that provides high sensitivity and specificity for infectious inflammation. More recently, genetic methods have made tracking regulation of the genes responsible for these biomarkers possible, giving current research new direction in the search to understand how host immune response combats infection. Despite the breadth of research, inadequate treatment as a result of delayed diagnosis continues to affect approximately one fourth of septic patients. In this report we review past and present diagnostic methods for sepsis and their respective limitations, and discuss the requirements for more timely diagnosis as the next step in curtailing sepsis-related mortality. We also present a proposal toward revision of the current diagnostic paradigm to include real-time immune monitoring.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The epidemiology of sepsis in the United States from 1979 through 2000
Martin, G. S., Mannino, D. M., Eaton, S., & Moss, M. (2003) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa022139 · Cited by 5,841
Ibrahim, E. H., Sherman, G., Ward, S., Fraser, V. J., & Kollef, M. H. (2000) · Chest · doi:10.1378/chest.118.1.146 · Cited by 1,779
Cited by
Pierrakos, C., & Vincent, J.-L. (2010) · Critical Care · doi:10.1186/cc8872 · Cited by 1,377
Point-of-Care Diagnostics for Global Health
Yager, P., Domingo, G. J., & Gerdes, J. (2008) · Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1146/annurev.bioeng.10.061807.160524 · Cited by 1,076
Boedicker, J. Q., Li, L., Kline, T. R., & Ismagilov, R. F. (2008) · Lab on a Chip · doi:10.1039/b804911d · Cited by 438
The revolution of PDMS microfluidics in cellular biology
Banik, S., Uchil, A., Kalsang, T., Chakrabarty, S., Ali, M. A., Srisungsitthisunti, P., Mahato, K. K., Surdo, S., & Mazumder, N. (2023) · Critical Reviews in Biotechnology · doi:10.1080/07388551.2022.2034733 · Cited by 84
Metadata
- Authors
- Carrigan, S. D., Scott, G., & Tabrizian, M.
- Venue
- Clinical Chemistry
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2004-08-01
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1301-1314
- ISSN
- 0009-9147 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-8561
- OpenAlex
- W2026466007
- Cited by
- 200
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 7.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Toward Resolving the Challenges of Sepsis Diagnosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1373/clinchem.2004.032144
- The paper
- Carrigan, S. D., Scott, G., & Tabrizian, M. (2004). Toward Resolving the Challenges of Sepsis Diagnosis. Clinical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2004.032144
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.