The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evaluation of Serum Protein Profiling by Surface-Enhanced Laser Desorption/Ionization Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry for the Detection of Prostate Cancer: I. Assessment of Platform Reproducibility
Open accessAbstract
Background: Protein expression profiling for differences indicative of early cancer has promise for improving diagnostics. This report describes the first stage of a National Cancer Institute/Early Detection Research Network-sponsored multiinstitutional evaluation and validation of this approach for detection of prostate cancer. Methods: Two sequential experimental phases were conducted to establish interlaboratory calibration and standardization of the surface-enhanced laser desorption (SELDI) instrumental and assay platform output. We first established whether the output from multiple calibrated Protein Biosystem II SELDI-ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (TOF-MS) instruments demonstrated acceptable interlaboratory reproducibility. This was determined by measuring mass accuracy, resolution, signal-to-noise ratio, and normalized intensity of three m/z “peaks” present in a standard pooled serum sample. We next evaluated the ability of the calibrated and standardized instrumentation to accurately differentiate between selected cases of prostate cancer and control by use of an algorithm developed from data derived from a single site 2 years earlier. Results: When the described standard operating procedures were established at all laboratory sites, the across-laboratory measurements revealed a CV for mass accuracy of 0.1%, signal-to-noise ratio of ∼40%, and normalized intensity of 15–36% for the three pooled serum peaks. This was comparable to the intralaboratory measurements of the same peaks. The instrument systems were then challenged with sera from a selected group of 14 cases and 14 controls. The classification agreement between each site and the established decision algorithm were examined by use of both raw peak intensity boosting and ranked peak intensity boosting. All six sites achieved perfect blinded classification for all samples when boosted alignment of raw intensities was used. Four of six sites achieved perfect blinded classification with ranked intensities, with one site passing the criteria of 26 of 28 correct and one site failing with 19 of 28 correct. Conclusions: These results demonstrate that “between-laboratory” reproducibility of SELDI-TOF-MS serum profiling approaches that of “within-laboratory” reproducibility as determined by measuring discrete m/z peaks over time and across laboratories.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Use of proteomic patterns in serum to identify ovarian cancer
Petricoin, E. F., Ardekani, A. M., Hitt, B. A., Levine, P. J., Fusaro, V. A., Steinberg, S. M., Mills, G. B., Simone, C., Fishman, D. A., Kohn, E. C., et al. (2002) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(02)07746-2 · Cited by 3,236
Phases of Biomarker Development for Early Detection of Cancer
Pepe, M. S., Etzioni, R., Feng, Z., Potter, J. D., Thompson, M. L., Thornquist, M., Winget, M., & Yasui, Y. (2001) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/93.14.1054 · Cited by 1,686
Self-citation
Cited by
Mass Spectrometry, Review of the Basics: Electrospray, MALDI, and Commonly Used Mass Analyzers
El-Aneed, A., Cohen, A., & Banoub, J. (2009) · Applied Spectroscopy Reviews · doi:10.1080/05704920902717872 · Cited by 386
The MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometric View of the Plasma Proteome and Peptidome
Hortin, G. L. (2006) · Clinical Chemistry · doi:10.1373/clinchem.2006.069252 · Cited by 351
Clinical proteomics: A need to define the field and to begin to set adequate standards
Mischak, H., Apweiler, R., Banks, R. E., Conaway, M., Coon, J., Dominiczak, A., Ehrich, J. H. H., Fliser, D., Girolami, M., Hermjakob, H., et al. (2007) · PROTEOMICS – Clinical Applications · doi:10.1002/prca.200600771 · Cited by 307
Self-citationMolecular markers of early pancreatic cancer
Goggins, M. (2005) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2005.19.711 · Cited by 214
Baker, A. F., Dragovich, T., Tate, W. R., Ramanathan, R. K., Roe, D., Hsu, C.-H., Kirkpatrick, D. L., & Powis, G. (2006) · Journal of Laboratory and Clinical Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.lab.2005.09.001 · Cited by 90
Metadata
- Authors
- Semmes, O. J., Feng, Z., Adam, B.-L., Banez, L. L., Bigbee, W. L., Campos, D., Cazares, L. H., Chan, D. W., Grizzle, W. E., Izbicka, E., Kagan, J., Malik, G., McLerran, D., Moul, J. W., Partin, A., Prasanna, P., Rosenzweig, J., Sokoll, L. J., Srivastava, S., Srivastava, S., Thompson, I., Welsh, M. J., White, N., Winget, M., Yasui, Y., Zhang, Z., & Zhu, L.
- Venue
- Clinical Chemistry
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2005-01-01
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 102-112
- ISSN
- 0009-9147 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-8561
- OpenAlex
- W2122430069
- Cited by
- 343
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 24.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluation of Serum Protein Profiling by Surface-Enhanced Laser Desorption/Ionization Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry for the Detection of Prostate Cancer: I. Assessment of Platform Reproducibility. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1373/clinchem.2004.038950
- The paper
- Semmes, O. J., Feng, Z., Adam, B.-L., Banez, L. L., Bigbee, W. L., Campos, D., Cazares, L. H., Chan, D. W., Grizzle, W. E., Izbicka, E., Kagan, J., Malik, G., McLerran, D., Moul, J. W., Partin, A., Prasanna, P., Rosenzweig, J., Sokoll, L. J., Srivastava, S., . . . Zhu, L. (2005). Evaluation of Serum Protein Profiling by Surface-Enhanced Laser Desorption/Ionization Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry for the Detection of Prostate Cancer: I. Assessment of Platform Reproducibility. Clinical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2004.038950
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.