The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Standardized Peptidome Profiling of Human Urine by Magnetic Bead Separation and Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry
Abstract
Background: Peptidome profiling of human urine is a promising tool to identify novel disease-associated biomarkers; however, a wide range of preanalytical variables influence the results of peptidome analysis. Our aim was to develop a standardized protocol for reproducible urine peptidome profiling by means of magnetic bead (MB) separation followed by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry (MS). Methods: MBs with defined surface functionalities (hydrophobic interaction, cation exchange, and metal ion affinity) were used for peptide fractionation of urine. Mass accuracy and imprecision were calculated for 9 characteristic mass signals (Mr, 1000–10 000). Exogenous variables (instrument performance, urine sampling/storage conditions, freezing conditions, and freeze-thaw cycles) and endogenous variables (pH, urine salt and protein concentrations, and blood and bacteria interferences) were investigated with urine samples from 10 male and 10 female volunteers. Results: We detected 427 different mass signals in the urine of healthy donors. Within- and between-day imprecision in relative signal intensities ranged from 1% to 14% and from 4% to 16%, respectively. Weak cation-exchange and metal ion affinity MB preparations required adjustment of the urinary pH to 7. Storage time, storage temperature, the number of freeze-thaw cycles, and bacterial and blood contamination significantly influenced urine peptide patterns. Individual urine peptide patterns differed significantly within and between days. This imprecision was diminished by normalization to a urinary protein content of 3.5 μg. Conclusion: This reliable pretreatment protocol allows standardization of preanalytical modalities and facilitates reproducible peptidome profiling of human urine by means of MB separation in combination with MALDI-TOF MS.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Thongboonkerd, V., Mcleish, K. R., Arthur, J. M., & Klein, J. B. (2002) · Kidney International · doi:10.1111/j.1523-1755.2002.kid565.x · Cited by 359
Renal and urinary proteomics: Current applications and challenges
Thongboonkerd, V., & Malasit, P. (2005) · PROTEOMICS · doi:10.1002/pmic.200401012 · Cited by 235 · cited 1×
“Discussion Urinary peptidome profiling with high-throughput methods such as MB–MALDI-TOF MS or SELDI-TOF MS is a promising tool in nephrology research (9, 12, 13).”
Method
Cited by
Biospecimen Reporting for Improved Study Quality (BRISQ)
Moore, H. M., Kelly, A. B., Jewell, S. D., McShane, L. M., Clark, D. P., Greenspan, R., Hayes, D. F., Hainaut, P., Kim, P., Mansfield, E., et al. (2011) · Journal of Proteome Research · doi:10.1021/pr200021n · Cited by 337
El-Kasti, M. M., Wright, C., Fye, H. K. S., Roseman, F., Kessler, B. M., & Becker, C. M. (2011) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.11.066 · Cited by 44
Metadata
- Authors
- Fiedler, G. M., Baumann, S., Leichtle, A., Oltmann, A., Kase, J., Thiery, J., & Ceglarek, U.
- Venue
- Clinical Chemistry
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2007-03-01
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 421-428
- ISSN
- 0009-9147 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-8561
- OpenAlex
- W1984243118
- Cited by
- 170
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 8.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Standardized Peptidome Profiling of Human Urine by Magnetic Bead Separation and Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1373/clinchem.2006.077834
- The paper
- Fiedler, G. M., Baumann, S., Leichtle, A., Oltmann, A., Kase, J., Thiery, J., & Ceglarek, U. (2007). Standardized Peptidome Profiling of Human Urine by Magnetic Bead Separation and Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry. Clinical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2006.077834
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.