Cited by 110Mass Spectrometry Techniques and ApplicationsOcular Surface and Contact LensDiabetes Management and Research

Mass spectral determination of fasting tear glucose concentrations in nondiabetic volunteers

Baca, Justin T, Taormina, Christopher R, Feingold, Eleanor, Finegold, David N, Grabowski, Joseph J, Asher, Sanford A·2007·Clinical Chemistry

Abstract

Background: There is considerable disagreement regarding the concentration of glucose in tears and its relationship to the concentration in blood. Improved sampling and analysis methods may resolve these discrepancies and possibly provide a basis for in situ tear glucose sensors. Methods: We used liquid chromatography (LC) with electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) to determine glucose in 1-μL tear fluid samples obtained from 25 fasting study participants. Tear fluid was collected with microcapillaries and a slitlamp microscope. Results: The median (range) of fasting tear glucose concentrations was 28 (7–161) μmol/L or 0.50 (0.13–2.90) mg/dL. The SD of tear glucose measurements for individuals varied linearly with the mean tear glucose concentration and was approximately half of the mean. We found no significant difference in tear glucose concentrations between contact lens users and nonusers (P = 0.715). We observed significant correlations between fasting blood and tear glucose concentrations (R = 0.50, P = 0.01). Conclusions: Our tear fluid collection and analysis method enables reliable measurement of equilibrium, fasting tear glucose concentrations. These concentrations are lower than those previously reported for nondiabetic persons. Larger population studies are required to determine correlations between blood and tear glucose concentrations and to determine the utility of contact lens–based sensors for the monitoring of diabetes. Our methods are applicable for study of other tear fluid analytes and may prove useful for monitoring other disease states.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1373/clinchem.2006.078543

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 62 · Cited by 110

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. [13]13. March WF, Smith FE, Herbrechtsmeier P, Domschke A, Morris C. Clinical trial of a non-invasive ocular glucose sensor. Diabetes 61st Scientific Sessions of the American Diabetes Association, June 22-26, 2001, Philadelphia. Amer Diabetes Assoc 2001;50:A125.
  2. [15]15. Kilp H, Heisig B. Glucose and lactate concentration in tears of rabbits following mechanical stress and wearing of contact lenses. Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthalmol 1975;193:259 -67.
  3. [20]20. Mandecki W, Ardelt B, Coradetti T, Davidowitz H, Flint J, Huang Z, et al. Microtransponders, the miniature RFID electronic chips, as platforms for cell growth in cytotoxicity assays. Cytometry A 2006;69:1097-105.
  4. [21]21. Ye F, Li MS, Taylor JD, Nguyen Q, Colton HM, Casey WM, et al. Fluorescent microsphere-based readout technology for multiplexed human single nucle- otide polymorphism analysis and bacterial identification. Hum Mutat 2001; 17:305-16.
  5. [45]45. Keim P, Van Ert MN, Pearson T, Vogler AJ, Huynh LY, Wagner DM. Anthrax molecular epidemiology and forensics: using the appropriate marker for different evolutionary scales [Review]. Infect Genet Evol 2004;4:205-13.
  6. [57]57. Bovo D, Rugge M, Shiao Y-H. Origin of spurious multiple bands in the amplification of microsatellite sequences. Mol Pathol 1999;52:50 -1. References

Authors
Baca, J. T., Taormina, C. R., Feingold, E., Finegold, D. N., Grabowski, J. J., & Asher, S. A.
Affiliations
University of Pittsburgh (US)
Corresponding author
Asher, Sanford A
Venue
Clinical Chemistry
Published
2007-07-01
Volume
53
Issue
7
Pages
1370-1372
ISSN
  • 0009-9147 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-8561
OpenAlex
W2032146310
Cited by
110
References
62
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 5
FWCI
1.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Chemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (DK-55348)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ocular Surface and Contact Lens
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
tear glucose, tears, fasting blood glucose, diabetes monitoring, tear sampling, interindividual variability
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Blood Glucose, Contact Lenses, Fasting, Glucose, Humans, Middle Aged, Reference Values, Tears, Spectrometry, Mass, Electrospray Ionization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review